rnaturalearth
rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.
Comparison · Analytics
tidypredict vs writexl
A side-by-side editorial comparison of tidypredict and writexl — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
tidypredict vs writexl: at a glance
What is tidypredict?
tidypredict now translates the gradient-boosting libraries people actually deploy
tidypredict converts fitted R models into SQL and dplyr expressions so predictions can run inside a database instead of in R. The 1.1.0 release added rpart, CatBoost, and LightGBM, with full objective and tree-type coverage for the boosted models. That followed 1.0.0, which broke random-forest output into a single formula, added glmnet, and cut fit-translation time for xgboost, partykit, and ranger.
What is writexl?
writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.
For most of its history writexl was a deliberately minimal wrapper: bump the vendored libxlsxwriter, handle NA and Date coercion correctly, support a list of data frames for multiple sheets, and nothing else. 2.0.0, released August 2026, changes that — near-full libxlsxwriter coverage, cell/worksheet/workbook formatting, cell comments, an `xl_cell_general` class carrying value, formula and hyperlink, a cell-by-cell refactor, libxlsxwriter 1.2.4, and memory-safety work. It landed the same day as 1.5.4, a typo fix on the old line.
tidypredict vs writexl: editorial side-by-side
tidypredict
0.0ANALYTICS
tidypredict now translates the gradient-boosting libraries people actually deploy
◆ Current state
tidypredict converts fitted R models into SQL and dplyr expressions so predictions can run inside a database instead of in R. The 1.1.0 release added rpart, CatBoost, and LightGBM, with full objective and tree-type coverage for the boosted models. That followed 1.0.0, which broke random-forest output into a single formula, added glmnet, and cut fit-translation time for xgboost, partykit, and ranger.
◆ Where it's heading
The package's value scales directly with how many model types it can translate, and the recent work has concentrated on the tree ensembles that dominate tabular modelling in practice. Coverage now extends past what parsnip wraps, since raw CatBoost models are supported alongside parsnip and bonsai ones with an explicit escape hatch for categorical features. Performance work on the translation step suggests the models being converted have grown large enough for that to matter.
◆ Prediction
With the major boosting libraries covered, the remaining gap is what happens to preprocessing, so tighter integration with recipes or orbital for translating whole workflows is the natural next step.
writexl
6.3ANALYTICS
writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.
◆ Current state
For most of its history writexl was a deliberately minimal wrapper: bump the vendored libxlsxwriter, handle NA and Date coercion correctly, support a list of data frames for multiple sheets, and nothing else. 2.0.0, released August 2026, changes that — near-full libxlsxwriter coverage, cell/worksheet/workbook formatting, cell comments, an `xl_cell_general` class carrying value, formula and hyperlink, a cell-by-cell refactor, libxlsxwriter 1.2.4, and memory-safety work. It landed the same day as 1.5.4, a typo fix on the old line.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has changed category. Its selling point was being the dependency-free, opinion-free way to get a data frame into xlsx; 2.0.0 makes it a formatting-capable writer that now compares itself against openxlsx2 in its own test suite. The cell-by-cell refactor is what made that possible and is also the largest structural change in the package's history. Note that a single contributor drove essentially all of it.
◆ Prediction
Expect follow-up releases fixing edge cases in the new formatting and comment APIs — the cell-by-cell rewrite is too large to land clean, and the 2.0.0 notes already mention an off-by-one in date columns.
Alternatives to tidypredict and writexl
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either tidypredict or writexl.
rgbif
rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.
rstanarm
rstanarm is community-maintained now, tracking Stan and lme4 rather than adding models.
taxa
taxa started a ground-up rewrite in 2021 and has published almost nothing since.
rotl
rotl's whole release history is keeping name matching honest against a moving taxonomy.
taxize
taxize spends its releases absorbing other people's API changes, one dead source at a time.
See all tidypredict alternatives → · See all writexl alternatives →
Recent activity from tidypredict and writexl
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 8d agowritexlwritexl 2.0.0 adds formatting, comments and full libxlsxwriter coverage ⚡
- 8d agowritexlwritexl 1.5.4 fixes a documentation typo
- 5mo agotidypredicttidypredict 1.1.0 adds CatBoost, LightGBM, and rpart support ⚡
- 8mo agotidypredicttidypredict 1.0.1 fixes base_score extraction for xgboost 3
- 8mo agotidypredicttidypredict 1.0.0 unifies random forest output and adds glmnet
- 1y agotidypredicttidypredict 0.5.1 exports internals for the orbital package
- 3y agotidypredicttidypredict 0.5 hands maintenance to a new maintainer
- 4y agotidypredicttidypredict 0.4.9 relicenses to MIT and fixes SQL generation
- 5y agowritexlwritexl 1.4.0 updates libxlsxwriter to 1.0.3
- 6y agowritexlwritexl 1.2 fixes NA in formulas and hyperlinks
- 7y agowritexlwritexl 1.1 fixes NA strings and bit64 coercion
- 8y agowritexlwritexl 1.0 writes Date values as datetimes
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between tidypredict and writexl?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. writexl is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is tidypredict better than writexl?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. writexl is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to tidypredict?
Top tidypredict alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidypredict alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidypredict for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to writexl?
Top writexl alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "writexl alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/writexl for the full list with editorial commentary on each.