← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

rgbif vs writexl

A side-by-side editorial comparison of rgbif and writexl — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

rgbif vs writexl: at a glance

Featurergbifwritexl
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesgbif, biodiversity-data, bulk-downloads, sql-queriesxlsx, libxlsxwriter, cell-formatting, major-version
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is rgbif?

rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.

rgbif ships several times a year and the recent releases cluster around downloads. 3.8.1 added `occ_download_sql()` for SQL-based occurrence downloads; 3.8.2 added DOI-to-download-key resolution and institutionKey downloads; 3.8.3 relayed GBIF's new throttling of bulk paging through `occ_search()` with a message pointing users at `occ_download()`; 3.8.5 added a family of `occ_download_stats_*()` functions plus multiple-taxonomy and verbatim-extension downloads. Alongside that, `name_backbone()` moved to GBIF API v2, and 3.8.0 soft-deprecated `occ_data()`.

Read the full rgbif trajectory →

What is writexl?

writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.

For most of its history writexl was a deliberately minimal wrapper: bump the vendored libxlsxwriter, handle NA and Date coercion correctly, support a list of data frames for multiple sheets, and nothing else. 2.0.0, released August 2026, changes that — near-full libxlsxwriter coverage, cell/worksheet/workbook formatting, cell comments, an `xl_cell_general` class carrying value, formula and hyperlink, a cell-by-cell refactor, libxlsxwriter 1.2.4, and memory-safety work. It landed the same day as 1.5.4, a typo fix on the old line.

Read the full writexl trajectory →

rgbif vs writexl: editorial side-by-side

R
rgbif
ANALYTICS
0.0

rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.

◆ Current state

rgbif ships several times a year and the recent releases cluster around downloads. 3.8.1 added `occ_download_sql()` for SQL-based occurrence downloads; 3.8.2 added DOI-to-download-key resolution and institutionKey downloads; 3.8.3 relayed GBIF's new throttling of bulk paging through `occ_search()` with a message pointing users at `occ_download()`; 3.8.5 added a family of `occ_download_stats_*()` functions plus multiple-taxonomy and verbatim-extension downloads. Alongside that, `name_backbone()` moved to GBIF API v2, and 3.8.0 soft-deprecated `occ_data()`.

◆ Where it's heading

Two things are happening at once. GBIF is discouraging bulk retrieval through the search API, and rgbif is building out the download path fast enough to absorb the traffic — SQL queries, DOI round-tripping, format description, and now statistics about the downloads themselves. Metadata coverage has expanded in parallel, with a dozen `dataset_*()` functions in 3.7.9 and GRSciColl institution search in 3.8.3. The deprecations are consistent: `occ_data()`, `occ_facet()`, `occ_count(type=)` all retired in favour of narrower replacements.

◆ Prediction

The download surface is where the next additions will land — likely more SQL-download tooling and further statistics endpoints, following 3.8.1 and 3.8.5.

W
writexl
ANALYTICS
6.3

writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.

◆ Current state

For most of its history writexl was a deliberately minimal wrapper: bump the vendored libxlsxwriter, handle NA and Date coercion correctly, support a list of data frames for multiple sheets, and nothing else. 2.0.0, released August 2026, changes that — near-full libxlsxwriter coverage, cell/worksheet/workbook formatting, cell comments, an `xl_cell_general` class carrying value, formula and hyperlink, a cell-by-cell refactor, libxlsxwriter 1.2.4, and memory-safety work. It landed the same day as 1.5.4, a typo fix on the old line.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has changed category. Its selling point was being the dependency-free, opinion-free way to get a data frame into xlsx; 2.0.0 makes it a formatting-capable writer that now compares itself against openxlsx2 in its own test suite. The cell-by-cell refactor is what made that possible and is also the largest structural change in the package's history. Note that a single contributor drove essentially all of it.

◆ Prediction

Expect follow-up releases fixing edge cases in the new formatting and comment APIs — the cell-by-cell rewrite is too large to land clean, and the 2.0.0 notes already mention an off-by-one in date columns.

Alternatives to rgbif and writexl

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either rgbif or writexl.

See all rgbif alternatives → · See all writexl alternatives →

Recent activity from rgbif and writexl

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 8d agowritexlwritexl 2.0.0 adds formatting, comments and full libxlsxwriter coverage
  2. 8d agowritexlwritexl 1.5.4 fixes a documentation typo
  3. 4mo agorgbifrgbif 3.8.5 adds occurrence download statistics functions
  4. 8mo agorgbifrgbif 3.8.4 moves name matching to GBIF API v2
  5. 11mo agorgbifrgbif 3.8.3 adds GRSciColl search, relays GBIF paging throttle
  6. 1y agorgbifrgbif 3.8.2 resolves download DOIs to keys
  7. 1y agorgbifrgbif 3.8.1 adds SQL-based occurrence downloads
  8. 2y agorgbifrgbif 3.8.0 soft-deprecates occ_data(), adds download describe
  9. 5y agowritexlwritexl 1.4.0 updates libxlsxwriter to 1.0.3
  10. 6y agowritexlwritexl 1.2 fixes NA in formulas and hyperlinks
  11. 7y agowritexlwritexl 1.1 fixes NA strings and bit64 coercion
  12. 8y agowritexlwritexl 1.0 writes Date values as datetimes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between rgbif and writexl?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. writexl is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is rgbif better than writexl?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. writexl is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to rgbif?

Top rgbif alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rgbif alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rgbif for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to writexl?

Top writexl alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "writexl alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/writexl for the full list with editorial commentary on each.