rnaturalearth
rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.
Comparison · Analytics
tidyclust vs writexl
A side-by-side editorial comparison of tidyclust and writexl — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
tidyclust vs writexl: at a glance
What is tidyclust?
tidyclust just tripled the model types it can fit, and handed finalization back to tune
tidyclust brings clustering into the tidymodels interface, and 0.3.0 was the release where its model coverage stopped being k-means and hierarchical clustering. DBSCAN and HDBSCAN, Gaussian mixtures, and mean shift all arrived at once as proper clustering specifications. The two releases since have been bug fixes on the metric and sparse-data paths, which is the usual pattern after a large surface addition.
What is writexl?
writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.
For most of its history writexl was a deliberately minimal wrapper: bump the vendored libxlsxwriter, handle NA and Date coercion correctly, support a list of data frames for multiple sheets, and nothing else. 2.0.0, released August 2026, changes that — near-full libxlsxwriter coverage, cell/worksheet/workbook formatting, cell comments, an `xl_cell_general` class carrying value, formula and hyperlink, a cell-by-cell refactor, libxlsxwriter 1.2.4, and memory-safety work. It landed the same day as 1.5.4, a typo fix on the old line.
tidyclust vs writexl: editorial side-by-side
tidyclust
0.0ANALYTICS
tidyclust just tripled the model types it can fit, and handed finalization back to tune
◆ Current state
tidyclust brings clustering into the tidymodels interface, and 0.3.0 was the release where its model coverage stopped being k-means and hierarchical clustering. DBSCAN and HDBSCAN, Gaussian mixtures, and mean shift all arrived at once as proper clustering specifications. The two releases since have been bug fixes on the metric and sparse-data paths, which is the usual pattern after a large surface addition.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is converging with the rest of tidymodels rather than maintaining a parallel API: finalize_model_tidyclust() and finalize_workflow_tidyclust() are deprecated because tune::finalize_model() and tune::finalize_workflow() now handle cluster_spec objects natively. That removes the last place where clustering needed its own version of a shared verb. With density-based and model-based clustering now present, the interface has to cover model families with genuinely different assumptions than the centroid methods it started with.
◆ Prediction
The recent fixes to cluster_metric_set() labeling and custom-metric authoring suggest evaluation is the current focus, so metrics suited to density-based clusters are the likely next addition.
writexl
6.3ANALYTICS
writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.
◆ Current state
For most of its history writexl was a deliberately minimal wrapper: bump the vendored libxlsxwriter, handle NA and Date coercion correctly, support a list of data frames for multiple sheets, and nothing else. 2.0.0, released August 2026, changes that — near-full libxlsxwriter coverage, cell/worksheet/workbook formatting, cell comments, an `xl_cell_general` class carrying value, formula and hyperlink, a cell-by-cell refactor, libxlsxwriter 1.2.4, and memory-safety work. It landed the same day as 1.5.4, a typo fix on the old line.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has changed category. Its selling point was being the dependency-free, opinion-free way to get a data frame into xlsx; 2.0.0 makes it a formatting-capable writer that now compares itself against openxlsx2 in its own test suite. The cell-by-cell refactor is what made that possible and is also the largest structural change in the package's history. Note that a single contributor drove essentially all of it.
◆ Prediction
Expect follow-up releases fixing edge cases in the new formatting and comment APIs — the cell-by-cell rewrite is too large to land clean, and the 2.0.0 notes already mention an off-by-one in date columns.
Alternatives to tidyclust and writexl
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either tidyclust or writexl.
rgbif
rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.
rstanarm
rstanarm is community-maintained now, tracking Stan and lme4 rather than adding models.
taxa
taxa started a ground-up rewrite in 2021 and has published almost nothing since.
rotl
rotl's whole release history is keeping name matching honest against a moving taxonomy.
taxize
taxize spends its releases absorbing other people's API changes, one dead source at a time.
See all tidyclust alternatives → · See all writexl alternatives →
Recent activity from tidyclust and writexl
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 8d agowritexlwritexl 2.0.0 adds formatting, comments and full libxlsxwriter coverage ⚡
- 8d agowritexlwritexl 1.5.4 fixes a documentation typo
- 1mo agotidyclusttidyclust 0.3.2 fixes k_means() on sparse predictors
- 1mo agotidyclusttidyclust 0.3.1 stops same-named metrics silently merging
- 2mo agotidyclusttidyclust 0.3.0 adds DBSCAN, Gaussian mixture, and mean shift models ⚡
- 1y agotidyclusttidyclust 0.2.4 switches distance calculations to philentropy
- 2y agotidyclusttidyclust 0.2.3 resolves a clustMixType reverse-dependency issue
- 2y agotidyclusttidyclust 0.2.2 resolves a ClusterR reverse-dependency issue
- 5y agowritexlwritexl 1.4.0 updates libxlsxwriter to 1.0.3
- 6y agowritexlwritexl 1.2 fixes NA in formulas and hyperlinks
- 7y agowritexlwritexl 1.1 fixes NA strings and bit64 coercion
- 8y agowritexlwritexl 1.0 writes Date values as datetimes
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between tidyclust and writexl?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. writexl is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is tidyclust better than writexl?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. writexl is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to tidyclust?
Top tidyclust alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidyclust alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidyclust for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to writexl?
Top writexl alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "writexl alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/writexl for the full list with editorial commentary on each.