← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

tealeaves vs xpose4

A side-by-side editorial comparison of tealeaves and xpose4 — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

tealeaves vs xpose4: at a glance

Featuretealeavesxpose4
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesplant-physiology, energy-balance, leaf-temperature, unitspharmacometrics, nonmem, model-diagnostics, compatibility
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is tealeaves?

A leaf-temperature model that finished its job in 2020 and has stayed finished

tealeaves solves for leaf temperature from an energy balance, using explicit units to keep parameters consistent and modelling lower and upper leaf surfaces separately so sensible and latent heat loss are computed for each. The package reached its current form in 2020 across versions 1.0.2 to 1.0.5, which added direct or functional sky temperature, dplyr 1.0.0 compatibility, and fixes to a parameter-crossing bug that the new sky temperature function had introduced. The only release since, v1.0.6 in July 2022, corrects a name in the citation file, stops parallel evaluation in a vignette and fixes README links.

Read the full tealeaves trajectory →

What is xpose4?

NONMEM's veteran diagnostics package, now moving at about one fix a year

xpose4 generates diagnostic plots for nonlinear mixed-effect models fitted in NONMEM, a role it has held since 2014 when five packages were consolidated into one. The three most recent releases are a documentation cross-reference update, a change of the default table-reading method to the slower and more reliable one, and a set of file-parsing bug fixes. No new plot types appear anywhere in the window.

Read the full xpose4 trajectory →

tealeaves vs xpose4: editorial side-by-side

T
tealeaves
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A leaf-temperature model that finished its job in 2020 and has stayed finished

◆ Current state

tealeaves solves for leaf temperature from an energy balance, using explicit units to keep parameters consistent and modelling lower and upper leaf surfaces separately so sensible and latent heat loss are computed for each. The package reached its current form in 2020 across versions 1.0.2 to 1.0.5, which added direct or functional sky temperature, dplyr 1.0.0 compatibility, and fixes to a parameter-crossing bug that the new sky temperature function had introduced. The only release since, v1.0.6 in July 2022, corrects a name in the citation file, stops parallel evaluation in a vignette and fixes README links.

◆ Where it's heading

This is finished scientific software. The arc runs from a 1.0.0 that already described the full model, through a usability decision in 1.0.1 to accept unitless values and assign units rather than demand them, to a 2020 cluster of compatibility and correctness work around publication. Nothing since has touched the model, and the 2022 release is pure paperwork. Its most instructive entry remains 1.0.5, where a new feature silently produced incorrect parameter crossing and the fix arrived with tests to pin the behaviour.

◆ Prediction

Expect nothing unless a dependency or CRAN check forces a release; on this record any such release will be documentation and packaging rather than a change to the energy balance.

X
xpose4
INFRA · APIS
0.0

NONMEM's veteran diagnostics package, now moving at about one fix a year

◆ Current state

xpose4 generates diagnostic plots for nonlinear mixed-effect models fitted in NONMEM, a role it has held since 2014 when five packages were consolidated into one. The three most recent releases are a documentation cross-reference update, a change of the default table-reading method to the slower and more reliable one, and a set of file-parsing bug fixes. No new plot types appear anywhere in the window.

◆ Where it's heading

Development now responds to the R ecosystem rather than to pharmacometrics: deprecated dplyr and tibble calls, readr and gam changes, and R documentation standards account for most recent entries. The last release with visible new capability is 4.6.0 in 2017, which extended xpose.VPC() with outlier identification, median-positioned lines and bin rugs. The feed's older tags are also unreliable — versions 4.5.0 through 4.5.3 all carry the same 2014 timestamp, so their order says nothing about sequence.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued compatibility maintenance at roughly one release a year, triggered by changes in R or in the packages it reads tables with; nothing in these entries points to new diagnostic capability being planned.

Alternatives to tealeaves and xpose4

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either tealeaves or xpose4.

See all tealeaves alternatives → · See all xpose4 alternatives →

Recent activity from tealeaves and xpose4

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11mo agoxpose4Documentation cross-references updated to R standards
  2. 4y agotealeavesCitation file, vignette and README fixes
  3. 4y agoxpose4Default table reading switched to the 'slow' method
  4. 5y agoxpose4Fixes for -99 row filtering, catab/cotab covariates and CSV import
  5. 6y agotealeavesParameter-crossing bug fixed with tests; coverage added
  6. 6y agotealeavesFix for custom sky temperature function being overwritten
  7. 6y agotealeavesSky temperature as value or function; dplyr 1.0.0 compatibility
  8. 6y agoxpose4Adjustable censored-line length in kaplan.plot()
  9. 7y agotealeavesUnitless parameter values now accepted and assigned units
  10. 7y agotealeavesFirst release: leaf energy balance with per-surface conductances
  11. 8y agoxpose4Compliance updates for readr and gam changes
  12. 9y agoxpose4VPC outlier identification, median lines and bin rugs

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between tealeaves and xpose4?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. tealeaves and xpose4 are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is tealeaves better than xpose4?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. tealeaves and xpose4 are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to tealeaves?

Top tealeaves alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tealeaves alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tealeaves for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to xpose4?

Top xpose4 alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "xpose4 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/xpose4 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.