fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
Comparison · Analytics
spEDM vs UCell
A side-by-side editorial comparison of spEDM and UCell — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
spEDM vs UCell: at a glance
What is spEDM?
Spatial causal discovery in R, one exposed method per release
spEDM brings empirical dynamic modeling to spatial data — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and pattern causality over spatial vector and raster inputs, with the numerics in C++ behind S4 generics. The recent releases have exposed geographical pattern causality and spatially convergent partial cross mapping at the R level with vignettes, and 1.12 turns to consolidating the API. It is part of the stscl family alongside the temporal-domain tEDM, with which it shares both its C++ core and its maintainer.
What is UCell?
A rank-based gene signature scorer that has grown by adapting to whatever object format single-cell R uses next
UCell scores gene signatures in single-cell data using a rank-based metric that is robust to dataset composition. Its release history reads as a sequence of ecosystem accommodations: Bioconductor submission in 2.0, SmoothKNN() for k-nearest-neighbor smoothing of scores in 2.2, smoothing applied directly to expression slots in 2.4, Seurat v5 assay compatibility in 2.6, multi-layer Seurat v5 objects in 2.8, and a missing_genes parameter in 2.14 that lets callers impute or skip signature genes absent from the data. Version 2.16 tracks Bioconductor 3.23 and points at a new publication and a Python implementation, pyUCell.
spEDM vs UCell: editorial side-by-side
spEDM
0.0ANALYTICS
Spatial causal discovery in R, one exposed method per release
◆ Current state
spEDM brings empirical dynamic modeling to spatial data — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and pattern causality over spatial vector and raster inputs, with the numerics in C++ behind S4 generics. The recent releases have exposed geographical pattern causality and spatially convergent partial cross mapping at the R level with vignettes, and 1.12 turns to consolidating the API. It is part of the stscl family alongside the temporal-domain tEDM, with which it shares both its C++ core and its maintainer.
◆ Where it's heading
The cadence is steady and predictable: each release surfaces one more EDM method as an R-level API with a vignette, then spends the rest of its notes on parameter-handling consistency across the generics. Breaking changes are frequent and deliberate — argument renames, parameter reordering, NA-handling defaults — which reads as a package still settling its interface while the method surface expands. Shared changes appear in tEDM within days, so interface churn lands on both packages at once.
◆ Prediction
Expect the next release to expose another causality variant at the R level with an accompanying vignette, and to continue renaming or reordering parameters toward consistency across the spatial and temporal packages.
UCell
0.0ANALYTICS
A rank-based gene signature scorer that has grown by adapting to whatever object format single-cell R uses next
◆ Current state
UCell scores gene signatures in single-cell data using a rank-based metric that is robust to dataset composition. Its release history reads as a sequence of ecosystem accommodations: Bioconductor submission in 2.0, SmoothKNN() for k-nearest-neighbor smoothing of scores in 2.2, smoothing applied directly to expression slots in 2.4, Seurat v5 assay compatibility in 2.6, multi-layer Seurat v5 objects in 2.8, and a missing_genes parameter in 2.14 that lets callers impute or skip signature genes absent from the data. Version 2.16 tracks Bioconductor 3.23 and points at a new publication and a Python implementation, pyUCell.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through this. The scoring algorithm itself has barely changed — the rank-based core is stable, and 2.14's reformatting to gene indices rather than string matching is a speed change, not a method change. What does change constantly is object-format compatibility, which is the tax of living between Seurat and SingleCellExperiment. The pyUCell reference in 2.16 is the first sign of the method reaching beyond R, though these notes say nothing about its scope.
◆ Prediction
The cadence is locked to Bioconductor's twice-yearly release train, so the next version will most likely accompany Bioconductor 3.24 with whatever Seurat or SingleCellExperiment changes it brings.
Alternatives to spEDM and UCell
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either spEDM or UCell.
gcube
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
cubist
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
simStateSpace
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
Recent activity from spEDM and UCell
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agoUCellTracks Bioconductor 3.23 and points to a Python port
- 4mo agospEDMData slicing for large-scale pattern causality, plus API breaks
- 6mo agospEDMspEDM 1.11
- 6mo agospEDMSpatially convergent partial cross mapping reaches the R API
- 8mo agospEDMRaster cross mapping with anisotropic embedding
- 9mo agoUCellUCell version 2.14
- 11mo agospEDMConfigurable distance metrics and multithreaded distance computation
- 1y agospEDMSpatial logistic map exposed at the R level
- 2y agoUCellUCell version 2.8
- 2y agoUCellUCell version 2.6
- 3y agoUCellUCell version 2.4
- 3y agoUCellUCell version 2.2
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between spEDM and UCell?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. spEDM and UCell are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is spEDM better than UCell?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spEDM and UCell are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to spEDM?
Top spEDM alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spEDM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spedm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to UCell?
Top UCell alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "UCell alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ucell for the full list with editorial commentary on each.