← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

spatstat.geom vs treespace

A side-by-side editorial comparison of spatstat.geom and treespace — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

spatstat.geom vs treespace: at a glance

Featurespatstat.geomtreespace
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesspatial-statistics, computational-geometry, r-package, three-dimensionalphylogenetics, transmission-trees, cran-compliance, maintenance-mode
Last editorial update9h ago47m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is spatstat.geom?

The geometry layer under spatstat, steadily absorbing 3D patterns and missing-data semantics

spatstat.geom holds the spatial data structures and geometric operations the rest of the spatstat family builds on — windows, tessellations, images, point patterns and the operations that move between them. Recent releases split their attention between extending those structures to three dimensions and hardening the discretisation code where polygonal geometry meets a pixel grid. 3.8-2 adds more capabilities for three-dimensional point patterns.

Read the full spatstat.geom trajectory →

What is treespace?

treespace ships once every year or two, and only when CRAN or a user forces it.

treespace explores and compares sets of phylogenetic and transmission trees, including the tree-distance measures used in outbreak reconstruction. Its release history is entirely reactive: five updates across five years, each triggered by a CRAN policy change, an upstream package removal, or a bug someone reported. The most recent is an Rd cross-reference format patch plus a maintainer email change.

Read the full treespace trajectory →

spatstat.geom vs treespace: editorial side-by-side

S
spatstat.geom
ANALYTICS
2.5

The geometry layer under spatstat, steadily absorbing 3D patterns and missing-data semantics

◆ Current state

spatstat.geom holds the spatial data structures and geometric operations the rest of the spatstat family builds on — windows, tessellations, images, point patterns and the operations that move between them. Recent releases split their attention between extending those structures to three dimensions and hardening the discretisation code where polygonal geometry meets a pixel grid. 3.8-2 adds more capabilities for three-dimensional point patterns.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through this window. The first is a family-wide push into 3D that originated in the simulation package and has now reached the geometry layer. The second is a slower semantic change: 3.5-0 introduced missing or unavailable (NA) spatial objects, and 3.6-0 followed with more facilities for handling them, meaning an absent window or image became a representable value rather than an error. Around both, the plotting and discretisation code accretes steadily — nonlinear colour maps, plot backgrounds, transparency control, signed distance transforms, and repeated attention to boundary pixels.

◆ Prediction

Expect the 3D surface here to keep filling in behind the simulation package rather than leading it, given that 3.8-2 follows the 3D simulation release by two months. The entries give no indication that the NA work is finished, since it has already spanned two releases.

T
treespace
ANALYTICS
0.0

treespace ships once every year or two, and only when CRAN or a user forces it.

◆ Current state

treespace explores and compares sets of phylogenetic and transmission trees, including the tree-distance measures used in outbreak reconstruction. Its release history is entirely reactive: five updates across five years, each triggered by a CRAN policy change, an upstream package removal, or a bug someone reported. The most recent is an Rd cross-reference format patch plus a maintainer email change.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is stable and lightly staffed rather than abandoned — bugs that affect correctness do get fixed, and CRAN deadlines are met. But the 2023 update is the telling one: rather than vendor or replace adephylo when it faced removal, the maintainers disabled two tree-vector methods and marked the loss as hopefully temporary. Two years on, nothing in the feed indicates they came back.

◆ Prediction

The next entry will most likely be another CRAN-compliance patch, on the pattern of four of the last five releases. Whether the Abouheif and sumDD methods ever return is not something these entries give any signal on.

Alternatives to spatstat.geom and treespace

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either spatstat.geom or treespace.

See all spatstat.geom alternatives → · See all treespace alternatives →

Recent activity from spatstat.geom and treespace

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 20d agospatstat.geomMore three-dimensional point pattern capabilities
  2. 2mo agospatstat.geomBetter boundary pixel handling when discretising windows
  3. 6mo agospatstat.geomAnalytic level sets and signed distance transforms
  4. 10mo agospatstat.geomNA object handling extended; clickpoly gains grid snapping
  5. 11mo agotreespacetreespace patches Rd cross-references for CRAN
  6. 1y agospatstat.geomNA spatial objects, hole removal and connected components
  7. 1y agospatstat.geomNonlinear colour and symbol maps; half-open quadrat tiles
  8. 2y agotreespacetreespace disables Abouheif and sumDD as adephylo exits CRAN
  9. 3y agotreespacetreespace fixes vignette build on NA tree names
  10. 5y agotreespacetreespace fixes dist indexing that broke its tests
  11. 5y agotreespacetreespace corrects tip label handling in transmission distances

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between spatstat.geom and treespace?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. spatstat.geom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is spatstat.geom better than treespace?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spatstat.geom is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to spatstat.geom?

Top spatstat.geom alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatstat.geom alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatstat-geom for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to treespace?

Top treespace alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "treespace alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/treespace-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.