rollupTree
The recursive-computation engine under massProps grows the accessors its consumer needed
Comparison · Infra & APIs
slendr vs surveycore
A side-by-side editorial comparison of slendr and surveycore — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
slendr vs surveycore: at a glance
What is slendr?
Population-genetic simulation in R, opened up to selection and finally easier to install.
slendr specifies spatial and non-spatial population-genetic models in R and simulates them through SLiM or msprime, returning tree sequences that tskit then analyses. Two threads dominate the current releases: keeping in step with fast-moving backends, with SLiM 5.1, pyslim 1.1.0 and Python 3.13 now required, and reducing the setup burden that its Python dependency imposes. Version 1.5.0 adds ephemeral uv-based virtual environments, so init_env(uv = TRUE) can stand in for creating a permanent environment with setup_env().
What is surveycore?
surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.
surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.
slendr vs surveycore: editorial side-by-side
slendr
0.0INFRA · APIS
Population-genetic simulation in R, opened up to selection and finally easier to install.
◆ Current state
slendr specifies spatial and non-spatial population-genetic models in R and simulates them through SLiM or msprime, returning tree sequences that tskit then analyses. Two threads dominate the current releases: keeping in step with fast-moving backends, with SLiM 5.1, pyslim 1.1.0 and Python 3.13 now required, and reducing the setup burden that its Python dependency imposes. Version 1.5.0 adds ephemeral uv-based virtual environments, so init_env(uv = TRUE) can stand in for creating a permanent environment with setup_env().
◆ Where it's heading
Since the 1.0.0 release added non-neutral simulation, the work has shifted from capability to friction. A large share of recent notes concerns Python environment handling, conda activation races on Windows, dependency pruning that made shiny optional, and argument names that misled users, as when gene_flow()'s rate argument turned out to mean total ancestry proportion rather than a rate. That is the profile of a package whose scientific surface is settled and whose remaining problems are the ones users actually hit.
◆ Prediction
Expect the uv-based environment path to move from fallback to default once it has proven itself, given the notes already describe an environment variable for making it so. The deprecated rate argument in gene_flow() is explicitly slated for removal in a future major release, which is the clearest signal here of what a 2.0 would contain.
surveycore
0.0INFRA · APIS
surveycore declared its API stable with every survey design type covered.
◆ Current state
surveycore is the estimation engine of a two-package survey stack, handling design objects and variance estimation while surveytidy supplies the dplyr verbs on top. The June release marks it 1.0.0 and states the API is complete and stable across Taylor series linearization, replicate weights, two-phase and non-probability designs, with means, totals, frequencies, quantiles, ratios, correlations, regression, t-tests, ANOVA and effective sample size all in place.
◆ Where it's heading
The last months before 1.0.0 were spent making the awkward designs behave like the ordinary ones. Non-probability designs gained jackknife replicate schemes and got their bootstrap repweights routed through the replicate-weight variance estimator in survey_glm(), matching every other estimation function. The survey_collection abstraction — several surveys treated as one pseudo-data-frame — was tightened rather than extended: divergent grouping across members now errors instead of stitching a patchwork with bind_rows(), and the missing-variable argument was renamed and given a stored default on the collection itself. A documentation audit before 1.0.0 turned up six dispatch and print bugs and corrections across forty-plus files, which is the kind of thing that surfaces when an API is being frozen rather than extended.
◆ Prediction
A declared-stable API means the next releases should be additive or corrective rather than breaking, and the pre-1.0.0 pattern of breaking renames should stop. The tight version pinning between the two packages means surveytidy releases will keep following surveycore's.
Alternatives to slendr and surveycore
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either slendr or surveycore.
massProps
A mass-properties rollup spends a year on documentation and follows its sibling's API
writeAlizer
Six months of releases and not one of them touched the scoring models
samplr
A cognitive-science sampling package ships once, then goes quiet for eighteen months
stochvol
A Bayesian volatility sampler in its maintenance decade, paying for its own speed
midr
A black-box interpreter reaches CRAN, then learns multi-class and survival responses
See all slendr alternatives → · See all surveycore alternatives →
Recent activity from slendr and surveycore
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoslendrEphemeral uv Python environments remove the setup step
- 2mo agosurveycoreFirst stable release: all four survey design types complete ⚡
- 3mo agosurveycoreget_effective_n() computes effective sample size
- 3mo agosurveycoreCollections error on divergent grouping; .on_missing renamed
- 4mo agosurveycoreCRAN patch removing surveytidy from the vignette
- 7mo agoslendrgene_flow() separates migration rate from ancestry proportion
- 9mo agoslendrshiny made optional; SLiM 5.1 and Python 3.13 required
- 1y agoslendrconda activation reverted to a slower but reliable path
- 1y agoslendrBackends raised to SLiM 5.0, tskit 0.6.4 and msprime 1.3.4
- 1y agoslendrNon-neutral models arrive; slim() interface simplified ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between slendr and surveycore?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. slendr and surveycore are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is slendr better than surveycore?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. slendr and surveycore are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to slendr?
Top slendr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "slendr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/slendr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to surveycore?
Top surveycore alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "surveycore alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/surveycore for the full list with editorial commentary on each.