← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

seriation vs treespace

A side-by-side editorial comparison of seriation and treespace — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

seriation vs treespace: at a glance

Featureseriationtreespace
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesseriation, matrix-reordering, optimization, clusteringphylogenetics, transmission-trees, cran-compliance, maintenance-mode
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is seriation?

seriation stopped shipping algorithms and started shipping a way to pick between them.

seriation finds meaningful orderings for matrices, distance objects and dendrograms, and carries a large registry of methods from classic combinatorial criteria to t-SNE and UMAP embeddings. The 1.5.0 release added a layer above that registry — seriate_best(), seriate_rep() and seriate_improve() — which run randomized methods repeatedly, in parallel, and keep the best result. Recent work is definitional and numeric rather than additive: 1.5.8 corrects the linear seriation criterion to match Hubert and Schultz's original 1976 definition.

Read the full seriation trajectory →

What is treespace?

treespace ships once every year or two, and only when CRAN or a user forces it.

treespace explores and compares sets of phylogenetic and transmission trees, including the tree-distance measures used in outbreak reconstruction. Its release history is entirely reactive: five updates across five years, each triggered by a CRAN policy change, an upstream package removal, or a bug someone reported. The most recent is an Rd cross-reference format patch plus a maintainer email change.

Read the full treespace trajectory →

seriation vs treespace: editorial side-by-side

S
seriation
ANALYTICS
0.0

seriation stopped shipping algorithms and started shipping a way to pick between them.

◆ Current state

seriation finds meaningful orderings for matrices, distance objects and dendrograms, and carries a large registry of methods from classic combinatorial criteria to t-SNE and UMAP embeddings. The 1.5.0 release added a layer above that registry — seriate_best(), seriate_rep() and seriate_improve() — which run randomized methods repeatedly, in parallel, and keep the best result. Recent work is definitional and numeric rather than additive: 1.5.8 corrects the linear seriation criterion to match Hubert and Schultz's original 1976 definition.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has shifted from breadth to judgment. Through 1.3.x the additions were new methods; from 1.5.0 the registry started carrying metadata about the methods — whether they are randomized, what criterion they optimize — so the package could choose and evaluate on the user's behalf. The 1.5.6 replacement of FORTRAN with C for BEA and ME points the same way, reducing the legacy surface underneath that machinery.

◆ Prediction

Further criterion audits are the likeliest next move, since 1.5.8 shows a published definition being reconciled against the implementation and the registry now records what each method optimizes. Expect corrections rather than new seriation algorithms.

T
treespace
ANALYTICS
0.0

treespace ships once every year or two, and only when CRAN or a user forces it.

◆ Current state

treespace explores and compares sets of phylogenetic and transmission trees, including the tree-distance measures used in outbreak reconstruction. Its release history is entirely reactive: five updates across five years, each triggered by a CRAN policy change, an upstream package removal, or a bug someone reported. The most recent is an Rd cross-reference format patch plus a maintainer email change.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is stable and lightly staffed rather than abandoned — bugs that affect correctness do get fixed, and CRAN deadlines are met. But the 2023 update is the telling one: rather than vendor or replace adephylo when it faced removal, the maintainers disabled two tree-vector methods and marked the loss as hopefully temporary. Two years on, nothing in the feed indicates they came back.

◆ Prediction

The next entry will most likely be another CRAN-compliance patch, on the pattern of four of the last five releases. Whether the Abouheif and sumDD methods ever return is not something these entries give any signal on.

Alternatives to seriation and treespace

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either seriation or treespace.

See all seriation alternatives → · See all treespace alternatives →

Recent activity from seriation and treespace

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11mo agotreespacetreespace patches Rd cross-references for CRAN
  2. 0y agoseriationseriation 1.5.8 realigns linear criterion with Hubert and Schultz
  3. 1y agoseriationseriation 1.5.7 adds BK_unconstrained, handles tiny inputs
  4. 1y agoseriationseriation 1.5.6 replaces FORTRAN BEA with C, modernizes allocation
  5. 2y agoseriationseriation 1.5.5 digest: AOE method, rep parameter, MDS_angle fix
  6. 2y agotreespacetreespace disables Abouheif and sumDD as adephylo exits CRAN
  7. 3y agoseriationseriation 1.5.1 refines pimage, permute and hmap
  8. 3y agoseriationseriation 1.5.0 adds seriate_best and parallel repeated search
  9. 3y agotreespacetreespace fixes vignette build on NA tree names
  10. 5y agotreespacetreespace fixes dist indexing that broke its tests
  11. 5y agotreespacetreespace corrects tip label handling in transmission distances

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between seriation and treespace?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. seriation and treespace are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is seriation better than treespace?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. seriation and treespace are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to seriation?

Top seriation alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "seriation alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/seriation-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to treespace?

Top treespace alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "treespace alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/treespace-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.