fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
A side-by-side editorial comparison of semmcci and tEDM — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Monte Carlo confidence intervals for SEM, now mostly reacting to upstream deprecations
semmcci generates Monte Carlo confidence intervals for structural equation model parameters, working alongside lavaan. Its four-year release history is a run of patch versions from the jeksterslab account, each adding a function or adjusting method detail. The recent ones are quieter still: the latest addresses a lavaan::getCov() deprecation in tests, and the one before it is described only as minor method edits.
The temporal half of the stscl EDM pair, tracking its spatial sibling
tEDM applies empirical dynamic modeling to time series — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and the logistic map — as the temporal counterpart to spEDM, with which it shares a maintainer and a C++ core. The recent releases are consolidation rather than expansion: index handling in cross mapping corrected, generics taught to accept varying E, k and tau, and the associated paper now cited in the README. Only three releases are visible in the feed.
semmcci generates Monte Carlo confidence intervals for structural equation model parameters, working alongside lavaan. Its four-year release history is a run of patch versions from the jeksterslab account, each adding a function or adjusting method detail. The recent ones are quieter still: the latest addresses a lavaan::getCov() deprecation in tests, and the one before it is described only as minor method edits.
The functional build-out finished some time ago. MCGeneric() in 1.1.3 and Func()/MCFunc() in 1.1.4 opened the package to user-defined functions of parameters, which is the natural end point for a Monte Carlo interval tool — once arbitrary functions are supported, there is little left to add. Since then releases have tracked lavaan's changes rather than semmcci's own direction, and the gap between them has stretched from months to over a year.
Expect the next release to be triggered by another lavaan deprecation rather than by new capability.
tEDM applies empirical dynamic modeling to time series — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and the logistic map — as the temporal counterpart to spEDM, with which it shares a maintainer and a C++ core. The recent releases are consolidation rather than expansion: index handling in cross mapping corrected, generics taught to accept varying E, k and tau, and the associated paper now cited in the README. Only three releases are visible in the feed.
tEDM moves in lockstep with spEDM. Configurable distance metrics, varying E/k/tau inputs, strict floating-point comparison and the S3 plotting font unification all appear in both packages within days or weeks, as does the maintainer surname correction. The recent balance has tilted toward correcting library and prediction index handling — the kind of repeated attention that suggests the indexing model was the weak point of the shared core.
Expect tEDM to keep inheriting the shared-core changes spEDM lands, with its own releases staying small and centred on cross-mapping parameter handling rather than new method surface.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either semmcci or tEDM.
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
See all semmcci alternatives → · See all tEDM alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. semmcci and tEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. semmcci and tEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top semmcci alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "semmcci alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/semmcci for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top tEDM alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tEDM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tedm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.