usmap
Ten years in, US mapping splits its data out and finally adds Puerto Rico.
Comparison · Infra & APIs
selection.index vs tf
A side-by-side editorial comparison of selection.index and tf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
selection.index vs tf: at a glance
What is selection.index?
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.
What is tf?
tf gave functional data a second dimension: curves whose values are vectors.
tf supplies the vector classes underneath the tidyfun stack — tfd for raw functional observations, tfb for basis-represented ones, both built on vctrs so curves sit in a data frame column and behave like any other vector. Until July that codomain was scalar. The 0.5.0 release adds tfd_mv and tfb_mv, classes for functions whose values are vectors in R^d, and rebuilds the analysis verbs to match.
selection.index vs tf: editorial side-by-side
selection.index
0.0INFRA · APIS
A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite
◆ Current state
selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.
◆ Where it's heading
The first version series added one function at a time — combinatorial indices, then genetic advance, then mean performance under randomised block designs — against a fixed phenotypic framing. Version 2.0.0 abandons that framing rather than extending it. Genomic and marker information become inputs the package understands, multi-cycle simulation becomes a built-in toolset, and the old combinatorial entry points are replaced by a named lpsi(). The 2.0.1 follow-up is entirely CI and numerical-stability work, which reads like a maintainer bracing a much larger surface.
◆ Prediction
A seventeen-runner CI matrix mirroring every CRAN check flavour, added days after 2.0.0, says the immediate concern is keeping a compiled multi-family package green rather than adding to it. Expect stabilisation releases before anything new.
tf
0.0INFRA · APIS
tf gave functional data a second dimension: curves whose values are vectors.
◆ Current state
tf supplies the vector classes underneath the tidyfun stack — tfd for raw functional observations, tfb for basis-represented ones, both built on vctrs so curves sit in a data frame column and behave like any other vector. Until July that codomain was scalar. The 0.5.0 release adds tfd_mv and tfb_mv, classes for functions whose values are vectors in R^d, and rebuilds the analysis verbs to match.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is widening what a functional observation can be, then porting the toolkit onto it. Registration arrived first in 0.4.0 for univariate curves and immediately gained an srvf_mv method for aligning components jointly, and tfb_mfpc() ports principal component analysis to the multivariate case with a single set of scores shared across components. Alongside that runs steady dependency shedding — mvtnorm and pracma both replaced by inlined samplers that reproduce prior draws bit-for-bit, glue dropped for cli in the previous release — and an unusually long tail of NA-handling and edge-case fixes, several caught in pre-release review of the new classes.
◆ Prediction
The new classes ship with FPCA, registration and shape alignment but the release notes describe tidyfun::tf_unnest() as the consumer of one new export, so the visible next step is the rest of the tidyfun stack catching up to vector-valued columns. Expect follow-up patches on the vctrs casting paths, which is where most of this release's late fixes clustered.
Alternatives to selection.index and tf
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either selection.index or tf.
trackeR
Fitness-tracking analysis in slow maintenance, still absorbing upstream breakage.
states
State-panel tooling holding steady since its 2020 data and ergonomics release.
multimark
Five years of compiler and CRAN fixes on a capture-recapture package.
metagroup
A first release that turns meta-analytic heterogeneity into interpretable subgroups.
vcmeta
A meta-analysis toolkit still renaming its own API as it adds effect sizes.
See all selection.index alternatives → · See all tf alternatives →
Recent activity from selection.index and tf
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agotfVector-valued functional data becomes a first-class type ⚡
- 5mo agotfCurve registration, five depth measures and sub-domain splitting
- 5mo agoselection.indexCI expanded to 17 runners after the 2.0.0 rewrite
- 5mo agoselection.indexGenomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core ⚡
- 6mo agoselection.indexUnspecified general performance improvements
- 2y agotfFix: tf_crosscov normalization
- 2y agoselection.indexMean performance for randomised block designs
- 3y agoselection.indexsel.index() and sel.score.rank() removed for comb.indices()
- 4y agoselection.indexGenetic advance calculation added
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between selection.index and tf?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. selection.index and tf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is selection.index better than tf?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. selection.index and tf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to selection.index?
Top selection.index alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "selection.index alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/selection-index for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tf?
Top tf alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.