mlr3proba
mlr3proba is shedding weight as its survival work moves into sibling packages
A side-by-side editorial comparison of see and tidytext — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
see grows wherever easystats adds a diagnostic, one plot method at a time.
see is the visualization layer for the easystats ecosystem, supplying plot() methods for performance, parameters and datawizard objects. Each release adds methods for whatever those packages shipped — prior predictive checks, DAG diagrams, factor-analysis graphs — alongside steady theme and geom refinement.
Finished, widely taught, and shipping roxygen fixes.
tidytext is the package that made unnest_tokens() and the tidy-data approach to text analysis standard, and it has reached the point where its releases contain nothing to announce. The last three are roxygen package anchors, alt text on vignette figures, and a single bug fix in one stm tidier. The most recent substantive changes were in 0.4.0 and 0.3.3 — stm tidiers for high FREX and lift words, a labels function for scale_x_reordered(), and support for tidying STM models that use content covariates.
see is the visualization layer for the easystats ecosystem, supplying plot() methods for performance, parameters and datawizard objects. Each release adds methods for whatever those packages shipped — prior predictive checks, DAG diagrams, factor-analysis graphs — alongside steady theme and geom refinement.
Growth here is downstream-driven rather than self-directed: see expands to cover new diagnostics as easystats produces them. Running alongside that is a sustained investment in presentation control — theme arguments on plot methods, elements that scale with base_size — which suits users embedding these plots in documents rather than glancing at them interactively.
Expect new plot methods to keep arriving in step with performance and parameters releases, with continued theming work rather than any change in the package's scope.
tidytext is the package that made unnest_tokens() and the tidy-data approach to text analysis standard, and it has reached the point where its releases contain nothing to announce. The last three are roxygen package anchors, alt text on vignette figures, and a single bug fix in one stm tidier. The most recent substantive changes were in 0.4.0 and 0.3.3 — stm tidiers for high FREX and lift words, a labels function for scale_x_reordered(), and support for tidying STM models that use content covariates.
The direction is stability, and the release triggers are external. quanteda releases force updates to the dfm tidiers, a Matrix release forces another, tokenizers deprecating its tweet tokenizer forces removal of the tweet-specific functions here, and CRAN's Rd anchor requirement produces a release of its own. Nothing in the recent stream suggests new capability is planned, and for a package this embedded in teaching material that is a defensible position rather than a problem.
The entries do not support predicting new features. The likely next release is another compatibility update prompted by quanteda, stm, or a CRAN documentation requirement.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either see or tidytext.
mlr3proba is shedding weight as its survival work moves into sibling packages
mlr3viz keeps the ecosystem's plots working while the plots themselves move out
mlr3tuning is rebuilding its async machinery under a stable public surface
timetk swallowed anomalize whole, then went quiet for two years
modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar
easystats' parameters package absorbs one more model class every few weeks
See all see alternatives → · See all tidytext alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. see and tidytext are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. see and tidytext are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top see alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "see alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/see-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top tidytext alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidytext alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidytext for the full list with editorial commentary on each.