← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

modelbased vs see

A side-by-side editorial comparison of modelbased and see — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:easystats

modelbased vs see: at a glance

Featuremodelbasedsee
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeseasystats, marginal-effects, contrasts, mixed-modelsr, easystats, data-visualization, ggplot2
Last editorial update49m ago6h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is modelbased?

modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar

modelbased computes marginal means, contrasts, and slopes from fitted models, and it ships every one to two months with a consistent shape: new comparison types, broader model support, and steady renaming toward clearer vocabulary. The recent arc runs from marginal effects inequality measures through inequality ratios to an omnibus global test and a post_process argument for multi-step comparisons. Argument names have been settled along the way, with trend becoming slope and an alias left behind.

Read the full modelbased trajectory →

What is see?

see grows wherever easystats adds a diagnostic, one plot method at a time.

see is the visualization layer for the easystats ecosystem, supplying plot() methods for performance, parameters and datawizard objects. Each release adds methods for whatever those packages shipped — prior predictive checks, DAG diagrams, factor-analysis graphs — alongside steady theme and geom refinement.

Read the full see trajectory →

modelbased vs see: editorial side-by-side

M
modelbased
ANALYTICS
0.0

modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar

◆ Current state

modelbased computes marginal means, contrasts, and slopes from fitted models, and it ships every one to two months with a consistent shape: new comparison types, broader model support, and steady renaming toward clearer vocabulary. The recent arc runs from marginal effects inequality measures through inequality ratios to an omnibus global test and a post_process argument for multi-step comparisons. Argument names have been settled along the way, with trend becoming slope and an alias left behind.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is building a compositional vocabulary rather than a fixed menu — contrasts of average slopes, contrasts across two numeric predictors, inequality summaries across all outcome categories, and now user-supplied post-processing of comparisons. Support quietly widens underneath, covering nestedLogit, brms finite mixtures, and offsets under population and average estimation. Plotting gets attention in proportion to how often these results are presented rather than tabulated, including collapse_by_group() for showing averaged raw data under mixed-model fits.

◆ Prediction

With post_process and omnibus tests both landed, the likely next step is making these composed comparisons easier to report — formatting or plotting methods for the multi-step results rather than new comparison types.

S
see
ANALYTICS
0.0

see grows wherever easystats adds a diagnostic, one plot method at a time.

◆ Current state

see is the visualization layer for the easystats ecosystem, supplying plot() methods for performance, parameters and datawizard objects. Each release adds methods for whatever those packages shipped — prior predictive checks, DAG diagrams, factor-analysis graphs — alongside steady theme and geom refinement.

◆ Where it's heading

Growth here is downstream-driven rather than self-directed: see expands to cover new diagnostics as easystats produces them. Running alongside that is a sustained investment in presentation control — theme arguments on plot methods, elements that scale with base_size — which suits users embedding these plots in documents rather than glancing at them interactively.

◆ Prediction

Expect new plot methods to keep arriving in step with performance and parameters releases, with continued theming work rather than any change in the package's scope.

Alternatives to modelbased and see

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either modelbased or see.

See all modelbased alternatives → · See all see alternatives →

Recent activity from modelbased and see

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.16.0 adds post-processing and omnibus contrast tests
  2. 1mo agoseesee 0.14.1 adds plots for prior checks and grouped means
  3. 2mo agoseesee 0.14.0 renders factor loadings as node-edge graphs
  4. 3mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.15.0 contrasts average slopes across numeric predictors
  5. 5mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.14.0 renames trend to slope and adds collapse_by_group()
  6. 6mo agoseesee 0.13.0 fixes reversed plot sorting, adds theme arguments
  7. 8mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.13.1 adds marginal group-level estimates and as.data.frame()
  8. 11mo agoseesee 0.12.0 extends normality checks to psych factor models
  9. 11mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.13.0 adds inequality ratios and slope marginalization
  10. 1y agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.12.0 introduces marginal effects inequality measures
  11. 1y agoseesee 0.11.0 scales theme elements with base_size
  12. 1y agoseesee 0.10.0 plots random-effect group levels for mixed models

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between modelbased and see?

Both compete on the same themes — easystats — within Analytics. modelbased and see are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is modelbased better than see?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. modelbased and see are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to modelbased?

Top modelbased alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modelbased alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modelbased for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to see?

Top see alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "see alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/see-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.