Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of sdtm.oak and tidytlg — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Two releases in, the open-source SDTM toolkit now covers the domains it originally excluded.
sdtm.oak builds SDTM datasets — the tabulation standard clinical trial submissions are filed in — from raw collected data. The 0.1.0 release shipped the mapping algorithm functions and derived-variable helpers but explicitly excluded DM, trial design domains, and several others. Version 0.2.0 closes the largest of those gaps, adding DM domain support via calc_min_max_date() and oak_calc_ref_dates(), plus generate_sdtm_supp() for supplemental qualifier domains.
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
tidytlg generates clinical tables, listings, and graphs from tidyverse-style pipelines, maintained under the pharmaverse organisation. All four releases in the window are from a single eight-month stretch in 2023, and their content is CRAN preparation, a logging-dependency swap, and multi-file support. Release notes are merge lists rather than described changes.
sdtm.oak builds SDTM datasets — the tabulation standard clinical trial submissions are filed in — from raw collected data. The 0.1.0 release shipped the mapping algorithm functions and derived-variable helpers but explicitly excluded DM, trial design domains, and several others. Version 0.2.0 closes the largest of those gaps, adding DM domain support via calc_min_max_date() and oak_calc_ref_dates(), plus generate_sdtm_supp() for supplemental qualifier domains.
This is the pharmaverse pattern of building submission tooling in the open, one domain class at a time, with the release history running through GitHub release-candidate tags before each CRAN submission. The direction is clear from the domain checklist: start with the mechanically simple Findings and Events domains, then work toward the ones with cross-dataset dependencies. DM and SUPP were the two that most often forced teams back to bespoke code.
The remaining exclusions from the 0.1.0 scope — trial design domains, SV, SE, RELREC and the EPOCH variable — are the obvious next targets, with EPOCH likely first since it depends on the reference dates 0.2.0 just added. Expect the same rhythm of release candidates ahead of each CRAN submission.
tidytlg generates clinical tables, listings, and graphs from tidyverse-style pipelines, maintained under the pharmaverse organisation. All four releases in the window are from a single eight-month stretch in 2023, and their content is CRAN preparation, a logging-dependency swap, and multi-file support. Release notes are merge lists rather than described changes.
The visible arc is getting onto CRAN and staying installable — vignette corrections per CRAN comments, a badge, a check fix, and replacing the timber logging package with logrx. The one functional addition is multiple-file support. There has been no release since October 2023, so on this evidence the package is stable or dormant rather than actively developing.
The entries give no signal about planned work; with nothing shipped in roughly two years, the more likely next event is a maintenance release triggered by a dependency or CRAN check than a feature.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either sdtm.oak or tidytlg.
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
datasetjson rebuilt its object model to track the CDISC Dataset-JSON 1.1 schema.
See all sdtm.oak alternatives → · See all tidytlg alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — clinical-trials, pharmaverse, r-package — within Analytics. sdtm.oak and tidytlg are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. sdtm.oak and tidytlg are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top sdtm.oak alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sdtm.oak alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sdtm-oak for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top tidytlg alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidytlg alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidytlg for the full list with editorial commentary on each.