← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

rlistings vs sdtm.oak

A side-by-side editorial comparison of rlistings and sdtm.oak — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:clinical-trialsr-packagepharmaverse

rlistings vs sdtm.oak: at a glance

Featurerlistingssdtm.oak
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesclinical-trials, listings, pagination, r-packageclinical-trials, sdtm, pharmaverse, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago5h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is rlistings?

Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.

rlistings renders clinical-trial subject listings and paginates them for regulatory output, sitting alongside rtables on the shared formatters engine. The releases in this window are dominated by pagination correctness: repeated key columns across pages, splitting by a variable, ordered-factor handling, column gaps, and font metrics. Development is a large rotating contributor set inside the insightsengineering organisation.

Read the full rlistings trajectory →

What is sdtm.oak?

Two releases in, the open-source SDTM toolkit now covers the domains it originally excluded.

sdtm.oak builds SDTM datasets — the tabulation standard clinical trial submissions are filed in — from raw collected data. The 0.1.0 release shipped the mapping algorithm functions and derived-variable helpers but explicitly excluded DM, trial design domains, and several others. Version 0.2.0 closes the largest of those gaps, adding DM domain support via calc_min_max_date() and oak_calc_ref_dates(), plus generate_sdtm_supp() for supplemental qualifier domains.

Read the full sdtm.oak trajectory →

rlistings vs sdtm.oak: editorial side-by-side

R
rlistings
ANALYTICS
0.0

Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.

◆ Current state

rlistings renders clinical-trial subject listings and paginates them for regulatory output, sitting alongside rtables on the shared formatters engine. The releases in this window are dominated by pagination correctness: repeated key columns across pages, splitting by a variable, ordered-factor handling, column gaps, and font metrics. Development is a large rotating contributor set inside the insightsengineering organisation.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is progressively delegating pagination to formatters rather than implementing it — paginate_listing() was refactored to call formatters' paginate_to_mpfs() directly, and truetype font support arrived through a new formatters API. That reduces duplicated logic but ties the package's page-break behaviour to a dependency it shares with rtables. Feature work beyond pagination is thin: better error messages for unsupported column classes, a cheatsheet.

◆ Prediction

Expect pagination fidelity to remain the focus, with changes arriving as formatters exposes more of its layout machinery rather than as rlistings-native features.

S
sdtm.oak
ANALYTICS
0.0

Two releases in, the open-source SDTM toolkit now covers the domains it originally excluded.

◆ Current state

sdtm.oak builds SDTM datasets — the tabulation standard clinical trial submissions are filed in — from raw collected data. The 0.1.0 release shipped the mapping algorithm functions and derived-variable helpers but explicitly excluded DM, trial design domains, and several others. Version 0.2.0 closes the largest of those gaps, adding DM domain support via calc_min_max_date() and oak_calc_ref_dates(), plus generate_sdtm_supp() for supplemental qualifier domains.

◆ Where it's heading

This is the pharmaverse pattern of building submission tooling in the open, one domain class at a time, with the release history running through GitHub release-candidate tags before each CRAN submission. The direction is clear from the domain checklist: start with the mechanically simple Findings and Events domains, then work toward the ones with cross-dataset dependencies. DM and SUPP were the two that most often forced teams back to bespoke code.

◆ Prediction

The remaining exclusions from the 0.1.0 scope — trial design domains, SV, SE, RELREC and the EPOCH variable — are the obvious next targets, with EPOCH likely first since it depends on the reference dates 0.2.0 just added. Expect the same rhythm of release candidates ahead of each CRAN submission.

Alternatives to rlistings and sdtm.oak

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either rlistings or sdtm.oak.

See all rlistings alternatives → · See all sdtm.oak alternatives →

Recent activity from rlistings and sdtm.oak

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1y agosdtm.oaksdtm.oak v0.2.0 CRAN release
  2. 1y agorlistingsError and message handling for difftime and zero-row listings
  3. 1y agosdtm.oaksdtm.oak v0.1.1 CRAN release
  4. 1y agorlistingsTrueType font support and col_gap in pagination
  5. 1y agosdtm.oaksdtm.oak v0.1.0 CRAN release
  6. 1y agosdtm.oakv0.1.0rc4: [skip vbump] 90 cran comments (#91)
  7. 2y agosdtm.oakv0.1.0rc2: Fix CRAN Comments (#84)
  8. 2y agosdtm.oakv0.1.0: [skip vbump] Bump version for cran release (#77)
  9. 2y agorlistingssplit_into_pages_by_var() and pagination moved onto formatters

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between rlistings and sdtm.oak?

Both compete on the same themes — clinical-trials, r-package, pharmaverse — within Analytics. rlistings and sdtm.oak are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is rlistings better than sdtm.oak?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rlistings and sdtm.oak are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to rlistings?

Top rlistings alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rlistings alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rlistings for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to sdtm.oak?

Top sdtm.oak alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sdtm.oak alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sdtm-oak for the full list with editorial commentary on each.