← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

sdsfun vs spEDM

A side-by-side editorial comparison of sdsfun and spEDM — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

sdsfun vs spEDM: at a glance

FeaturesdsfunspEDM
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesspatial-statistics, geodetector, spatial-clustering, rcppcausal-inference, spatial-analysis, empirical-dynamic-modeling, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is sdsfun?

A spatial-statistics utility package exists to be depended on, and is built accordingly.

sdsfun collects spatial data science utilities — neighbour lists, spatial constrained clustering, discretization, dummy variable generation, geographical detector statistics and projection helpers — with the computationally heavy parts implemented in Rcpp. It was assembled quickly across late 2024, adding a function set roughly every three weeks, and has slowed since to a couple of releases a year. The most recent work is corrective: no longer initializing the RNG state at load, fixing matrix inputs misread as vectors, and clearing an Armadillo deprecation.

Read the full sdsfun trajectory →

What is spEDM?

Spatial causal discovery in R, one exposed method per release

spEDM brings empirical dynamic modeling to spatial data — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and pattern causality over spatial vector and raster inputs, with the numerics in C++ behind S4 generics. The recent releases have exposed geographical pattern causality and spatially convergent partial cross mapping at the R level with vignettes, and 1.12 turns to consolidating the API. It is part of the stscl family alongside the temporal-domain tEDM, with which it shares both its C++ core and its maintainer.

Read the full spEDM trajectory →

sdsfun vs spEDM: editorial side-by-side

S
sdsfun
ANALYTICS
0.0

A spatial-statistics utility package exists to be depended on, and is built accordingly.

◆ Current state

sdsfun collects spatial data science utilities — neighbour lists, spatial constrained clustering, discretization, dummy variable generation, geographical detector statistics and projection helpers — with the computationally heavy parts implemented in Rcpp. It was assembled quickly across late 2024, adding a function set roughly every three weeks, and has slowed since to a couple of releases a year. The most recent work is corrective: no longer initializing the RNG state at load, fixing matrix inputs misread as vectors, and clearing an Armadillo deprecation.

◆ Where it's heading

This is infrastructure for a family of packages rather than an end-user tool, and the changelog says so directly — functions were added to support gdverse and sesp, and moran_test was migrated in from geocomplexity. That migration pattern is the defining move: capability consolidates here so the downstream packages can share it instead of each carrying its own copy. Growth has slowed as that consolidation completed, leaving correctness and dependency upkeep.

◆ Prediction

Given the package moves when its dependents need something, the next release most likely brings in another shared function or responds to a downstream requirement rather than following its own plan. Armadillo and CRAN check changes remain the reliable source of maintenance work.

S
spEDM
ANALYTICS
0.0

Spatial causal discovery in R, one exposed method per release

◆ Current state

spEDM brings empirical dynamic modeling to spatial data — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and pattern causality over spatial vector and raster inputs, with the numerics in C++ behind S4 generics. The recent releases have exposed geographical pattern causality and spatially convergent partial cross mapping at the R level with vignettes, and 1.12 turns to consolidating the API. It is part of the stscl family alongside the temporal-domain tEDM, with which it shares both its C++ core and its maintainer.

◆ Where it's heading

The cadence is steady and predictable: each release surfaces one more EDM method as an R-level API with a vignette, then spends the rest of its notes on parameter-handling consistency across the generics. Breaking changes are frequent and deliberate — argument renames, parameter reordering, NA-handling defaults — which reads as a package still settling its interface while the method surface expands. Shared changes appear in tEDM within days, so interface churn lands on both packages at once.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to expose another causality variant at the R level with an accompanying vignette, and to continue renaming or reordering parameters toward consistency across the spatial and temporal packages.

Alternatives to sdsfun and spEDM

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either sdsfun or spEDM.

See all sdsfun alternatives → · See all spEDM alternatives →

Recent activity from sdsfun and spEDM

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agospEDMData slicing for large-scale pattern causality, plus API breaks
  2. 6mo agospEDMspEDM 1.11
  3. 6mo agospEDMSpatially convergent partial cross mapping reaches the R API
  4. 8mo agospEDMRaster cross mapping with anisotropic embedding
  5. 10mo agosdsfunPackage load stops touching the RNG state
  6. 11mo agospEDMConfigurable distance metrics and multithreaded distance computation
  7. 1y agospEDMSpatial logistic map exposed at the R level
  8. 1y agosdsfunUnified partial correlation testing and head/tails discretization
  9. 1y agosdsfunMissing-value handling added to linear trend removal
  10. 1y agosdsfunCovariate-based detrending and long-to-matrix spatial reshaping
  11. 1y agosdsfunSpatially constrained hierarchical clustering and SPADE estimation
  12. 1y agosdsfunFast geodetector q-value estimator added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between sdsfun and spEDM?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. sdsfun and spEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is sdsfun better than spEDM?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. sdsfun and spEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to sdsfun?

Top sdsfun alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sdsfun alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sdsfun for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spEDM?

Top spEDM alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spEDM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spedm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.