← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

kde1d vs spEDM

A side-by-side editorial comparison of kde1d and spEDM — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

kde1d vs spEDM: at a glance

Featurekde1dspEDM
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesdensity-estimation, kernel-methods, zero-inflation, cpp-librarycausal-inference, spatial-analysis, empirical-dynamic-modeling, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago4h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is kde1d?

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

Read the full kde1d trajectory →

What is spEDM?

Spatial causal discovery in R, one exposed method per release

spEDM brings empirical dynamic modeling to spatial data — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and pattern causality over spatial vector and raster inputs, with the numerics in C++ behind S4 generics. The recent releases have exposed geographical pattern causality and spatially convergent partial cross mapping at the R level with vignettes, and 1.12 turns to consolidating the API. It is part of the stscl family alongside the temporal-domain tEDM, with which it shares both its C++ core and its maintainer.

Read the full spEDM trajectory →

kde1d vs spEDM: editorial side-by-side

K
kde1d
ANALYTICS
0.0

A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.

◆ Current state

kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has alternated between performance work and widening the class of data it accepts. The 1.0.0 release was the performance milestone — FFT-based estimation, a better integration algorithm for the p, q and r functions, deterministic jittering replacing randomness, and standalone C++ headers. The 1.1.0 release is the scope milestone, adding a third data type to the two it already handled. Releases come from the same maintainer as svines and cluster on shared dates, so changes in the underlying C++ surface across the vine and density stack tend to ship together.

◆ Prediction

With the C++ API deliberately reworked for standalone use at 1.1.0, further work most plausibly consolidates that interface rather than adding data types. What 1.1.1 actually changed is not readable from its body.

S
spEDM
ANALYTICS
0.0

Spatial causal discovery in R, one exposed method per release

◆ Current state

spEDM brings empirical dynamic modeling to spatial data — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and pattern causality over spatial vector and raster inputs, with the numerics in C++ behind S4 generics. The recent releases have exposed geographical pattern causality and spatially convergent partial cross mapping at the R level with vignettes, and 1.12 turns to consolidating the API. It is part of the stscl family alongside the temporal-domain tEDM, with which it shares both its C++ core and its maintainer.

◆ Where it's heading

The cadence is steady and predictable: each release surfaces one more EDM method as an R-level API with a vignette, then spends the rest of its notes on parameter-handling consistency across the generics. Breaking changes are frequent and deliberate — argument renames, parameter reordering, NA-handling defaults — which reads as a package still settling its interface while the method surface expands. Shared changes appear in tEDM within days, so interface churn lands on both packages at once.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to expose another causality variant at the R level with an accompanying vignette, and to continue renaming or reordering parameters toward consistency across the spatial and temporal packages.

Alternatives to kde1d and spEDM

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either kde1d or spEDM.

See all kde1d alternatives → · See all spEDM alternatives →

Recent activity from kde1d and spEDM

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agospEDMData slicing for large-scale pattern causality, plus API breaks
  2. 6mo agospEDMspEDM 1.11
  3. 6mo agospEDMSpatially convergent partial cross mapping reaches the R API
  4. 8mo agospEDMRaster cross mapping with anisotropic embedding
  5. 11mo agospEDMConfigurable distance metrics and multithreaded distance computation
  6. 1y agospEDMSpatial logistic map exposed at the R level
  7. 1y agokde1dkde1d 1.1.1
  8. 1y agokde1dZero-inflated mixtures and a new standalone C++ API
  9. 4y agokde1dBit-wise Boolean operations removed
  10. 5y agokde1ddkde1d() invisible output fixed
  11. 5y agokde1dValgrind false positive silenced
  12. 6y agokde1dqrng dependency dropped; undefined behaviour fixed

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between kde1d and spEDM?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. kde1d and spEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is kde1d better than spEDM?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. kde1d and spEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to kde1d?

Top kde1d alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kde1d alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kde1d for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spEDM?

Top spEDM alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spEDM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spedm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.