← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

scoringutils vs spatstat.model

A side-by-side editorial comparison of scoringutils and spatstat.model — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

scoringutils vs spatstat.model: at a glance

Featurescoringutilsspatstat.model
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesforecast evaluation, probabilistic scoring, multivariate forecasts, s3 classesspatial-statistics, point-processes, model-fitting, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is scoringutils?

scoringutils pushes forecast scoring past univariate outcomes into multivariate and ordinal ones.

scoringutils evaluates probabilistic forecasts in R. Since the 2.0.0 rewrite it is organised around typed forecast objects — quantile, sample, binary, point, nominal — built by as_forecast_<type>() constructors and scored through S3 methods. Version 2.2.0 adds multivariate sample and point types with the variogram score, and 2.1.0 added ordinal forecasts.

Read the full scoringutils trajectory →

What is spatstat.model?

spatstat's inference layer builds out determinantal and cluster process fitting

spatstat.model fits point process models and provides the diagnostics that go with them. The recent window is dominated by determinantal point process work — a variance-covariance matrix and more diagnostics in 3.7-2, additional `intensity` and `repul` methods in 3.7-1, and ROC curves for determinantal models in 3.5-0. Cluster and Cox process inference has advanced in parallel, with Waagepetersen's composite likelihood arriving in 3.6-1.

Read the full spatstat.model trajectory →

scoringutils vs spatstat.model: editorial side-by-side

S
scoringutils
ANALYTICS
0.0

scoringutils pushes forecast scoring past univariate outcomes into multivariate and ordinal ones.

◆ Current state

scoringutils evaluates probabilistic forecasts in R. Since the 2.0.0 rewrite it is organised around typed forecast objects — quantile, sample, binary, point, nominal — built by as_forecast_<type>() constructors and scored through S3 methods. Version 2.2.0 adds multivariate sample and point types with the variogram score, and 2.1.0 added ordinal forecasts.

◆ Where it's heading

The forecast-type system introduced in 2.0.0 is the engine of everything since: each release fits another outcome shape into it rather than reworking the scoring interface. Multivariate support is the largest of those additions because it scores the dependence structure between variables, not just marginal accuracy. Type and constructor names are still being reconciled — forecast_sample_multivariate was renamed to forecast_multivariate_sample with a deprecation window.

◆ Prediction

Expect further forecast types and metrics slotted into the same constructor pattern, and the deprecated forecast_sample_multivariate alias and is_forecast_sample_multivariate() to be removed once that window closes.

S2.5

spatstat's inference layer builds out determinantal and cluster process fitting

◆ Current state

spatstat.model fits point process models and provides the diagnostics that go with them. The recent window is dominated by determinantal point process work — a variance-covariance matrix and more diagnostics in 3.7-2, additional `intensity` and `repul` methods in 3.7-1, and ROC curves for determinantal models in 3.5-0. Cluster and Cox process inference has advanced in parallel, with Waagepetersen's composite likelihood arriving in 3.6-1.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is that model classes enter the package as fitting machinery first and only later gain the apparatus that makes them usable in practice — standard errors, diagnostics, residuals, model checking. Determinantal processes are visibly midway through that progression, reaching variance-covariance estimation only in the most recent release. Around this, the package has been broadening where models can be fitted at all: replicated point patterns on linear networks in 3.5-0, extended spatial logistic regression, and conversion of recursively partitioned models to tessellations.

◆ Prediction

Expect determinantal model support to keep filling out along the same path other model classes took, since variance estimation has only just arrived and partial residuals already exist for the cluster and Cox families. The entries do not signal a move into three dimensions here, unlike the geometry and simulation packages.

Alternatives to scoringutils and spatstat.model

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either scoringutils or spatstat.model.

See all scoringutils alternatives → · See all spatstat.model alternatives →

Recent activity from scoringutils and spatstat.model

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 18d agospatstat.modelVariance-covariance and diagnostics for determinantal models
  2. 2mo agospatstat.modelMore intensity and repul methods; boundary-aware predictions
  3. 4mo agoscoringutilsMultivariate forecast scoring and the variogram score
  4. 6mo agospatstat.modelComposite likelihood for cluster processes
  5. 8mo agospatstat.modelReplicated network models and partial residuals
  6. 10mo agospatstat.modelintensity.ppm improvements for Geyer models
  7. 11mo agoscoringutilsQuantile levels rounded to avoid float duplicates
  8. 1y agospatstat.modelROC curve support substantially extended
  9. 1y agoscoringutilsOptional p-values in pairwise comparisons; PIT fix
  10. 1y agoscoringutilsOrdinal forecasts get their own class and metrics
  11. 1y agoscoringutilsRewrite: typed forecast objects and pluggable metrics
  12. 2y agoscoringutilsTwo bug fixes and package-site infrastructure

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between scoringutils and spatstat.model?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. spatstat.model is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is scoringutils better than spatstat.model?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spatstat.model is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to scoringutils?

Top scoringutils alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "scoringutils alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/scoringutils for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spatstat.model?

Top spatstat.model alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatstat.model alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatstat-model for the full list with editorial commentary on each.