← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

bpbounds vs spatstat.model

A side-by-side editorial comparison of bpbounds and spatstat.model — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

bpbounds vs spatstat.model: at a glance

Featurebpboundsspatstat.model
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themescausal inference, instrumental variables, r, partial identificationspatial-statistics, point-processes, model-fitting, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is bpbounds?

bpbounds found the same swapped-cell bug twice and clamped its bounds back into range

bpbounds computes nonparametric Balke-Pearl bounds on the average causal effect from instrumental variable data, in the bivariate and trivariate cases. After years of pure packaging maintenance, the two 2026 releases are analytical corrections. Bounds on intervention probabilities are now clamped to [0, 1] so derived causal risk ratio bounds cannot fall outside their feasible range, and a cell-ordering error in the trivariate three-category instrument path has been repaired.

Read the full bpbounds trajectory →

What is spatstat.model?

spatstat's inference layer builds out determinantal and cluster process fitting

spatstat.model fits point process models and provides the diagnostics that go with them. The recent window is dominated by determinantal point process work — a variance-covariance matrix and more diagnostics in 3.7-2, additional `intensity` and `repul` methods in 3.7-1, and ROC curves for determinantal models in 3.5-0. Cluster and Cox process inference has advanced in parallel, with Waagepetersen's composite likelihood arriving in 3.6-1.

Read the full spatstat.model trajectory →

bpbounds vs spatstat.model: editorial side-by-side

B
bpbounds
ANALYTICS
0.0

bpbounds found the same swapped-cell bug twice and clamped its bounds back into range

◆ Current state

bpbounds computes nonparametric Balke-Pearl bounds on the average causal effect from instrumental variable data, in the bivariate and trivariate cases. After years of pure packaging maintenance, the two 2026 releases are analytical corrections. Bounds on intervention probabilities are now clamped to [0, 1] so derived causal risk ratio bounds cannot fall outside their feasible range, and a cell-ordering error in the trivariate three-category instrument path has been repaired.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is toward agreement with the reference Stata implementation and away from silently wrong output. The clamping change is described as matching the same fix in the Stata package, which suggests the two implementations are being reconciled rather than developed independently. The cell-ordering defect is the more instructive one: it was fixed in the calculation function in 0.1.7 and then again in the constraint matrix in 0.1.8, meaning the same x=0,y=1 / x=1,y=0 swap had been written in two places.

◆ Prediction

Since the recent fixes came from an external contributor's report and both touched the trivariate three-category path, the untested corners of that path are where further corrections would surface — but the release notes give no roadmap beyond parity with the Stata package.

S2.5

spatstat's inference layer builds out determinantal and cluster process fitting

◆ Current state

spatstat.model fits point process models and provides the diagnostics that go with them. The recent window is dominated by determinantal point process work — a variance-covariance matrix and more diagnostics in 3.7-2, additional `intensity` and `repul` methods in 3.7-1, and ROC curves for determinantal models in 3.5-0. Cluster and Cox process inference has advanced in parallel, with Waagepetersen's composite likelihood arriving in 3.6-1.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is that model classes enter the package as fitting machinery first and only later gain the apparatus that makes them usable in practice — standard errors, diagnostics, residuals, model checking. Determinantal processes are visibly midway through that progression, reaching variance-covariance estimation only in the most recent release. Around this, the package has been broadening where models can be fitted at all: replicated point patterns on linear networks in 3.5-0, extended spatial logistic regression, and conversion of recursively partitioned models to tessellations.

◆ Prediction

Expect determinantal model support to keep filling out along the same path other model classes took, since variance estimation has only just arrived and partial residuals already exist for the cluster and Cox families. The entries do not signal a move into three dimensions here, unlike the geometry and simulation packages.

Alternatives to bpbounds and spatstat.model

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bpbounds or spatstat.model.

See all bpbounds alternatives → · See all spatstat.model alternatives →

Recent activity from bpbounds and spatstat.model

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 18d agospatstat.modelVariance-covariance and diagnostics for determinantal models
  2. 1mo agobpboundsbpbounds clamps probability bounds and fixes a constraint-matrix swap
  3. 2mo agospatstat.modelMore intensity and repul methods; boundary-aware predictions
  4. 2mo agobpboundsbpbounds fixes swapped cells in the trivariate calculation
  5. 6mo agospatstat.modelComposite likelihood for cluster processes
  6. 8mo agospatstat.modelReplicated network models and partial residuals
  7. 10mo agospatstat.modelintensity.ppm improvements for Geyer models
  8. 1y agospatstat.modelROC curve support substantially extended
  9. 2y agobpboundsbpbounds 0.1.6
  10. 3y agobpboundsbpbounds 0.1.5
  11. 6y agobpboundsVersion 0.1.4 on CRAN
  12. 7y agobpboundsVersion 0.1.3

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between bpbounds and spatstat.model?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. spatstat.model is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is bpbounds better than spatstat.model?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spatstat.model is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to bpbounds?

Top bpbounds alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bpbounds alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bpbounds for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spatstat.model?

Top spatstat.model alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatstat.model alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatstat-model for the full list with editorial commentary on each.