← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

rnpn vs rphylopic

A side-by-side editorial comparison of rnpn and rphylopic — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

rnpn vs rphylopic: at a glance

Featurernpnrphylopic
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesphenology, api-client, ecological-data, data-cleaningphylogenetics, data-visualization, r-package, ggplot2
Last editorial update1h ago5h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is rnpn?

The USA phenology data client rebuilt its entire stack and stopped handing users -9999 as a number.

rnpn is the R client for the USA National Phenology Network, retrieving observation records, phenometrics and gridded model layers. Version 1.3.0 in March 2025 replaced nearly all of its infrastructure at once — sp and raster dropped, terra made optional, XML swapped for xml2, plyr for dplyr, httr and curl for httr2 — and changed what functions return, with tibbles in place of data.tables and empty tibbles in place of NULL on error. The two releases since have completed the missing-value handling and restored performance lost in the transition.

Read the full rnpn trajectory →

What is rphylopic?

The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.

rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.

Read the full rphylopic trajectory →

rnpn vs rphylopic: editorial side-by-side

R
rnpn
ANALYTICS
0.0

The USA phenology data client rebuilt its entire stack and stopped handing users -9999 as a number.

◆ Current state

rnpn is the R client for the USA National Phenology Network, retrieving observation records, phenometrics and gridded model layers. Version 1.3.0 in March 2025 replaced nearly all of its infrastructure at once — sp and raster dropped, terra made optional, XML swapped for xml2, plyr for dplyr, httr and curl for httr2 — and changed what functions return, with tibbles in place of data.tables and empty tibbles in place of NULL on error. The two releases since have completed the missing-value handling and restored performance lost in the transition.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being brought onto the current R stack and made honest about missing data, and those are the same project. Converting the -9999 sentinel to NA started in 1.3.0 for download functions and was extended to all columns in 1.4.1; the string "emptyvalue" got the same treatment. Beyond the migration, the feature additions are modest and specific to the domain, such as custom start and end dates for defining a phenometrics season.

◆ Prediction

With the dependency migration finished and sentinel handling now applied across all columns, the next releases most likely return to domain features and to fixes surfaced by the server side, which has already prompted work through migrations and backend moves. The removed progress indicator is an acknowledged regression that may come back.

R
rphylopic
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.

◆ Current state

rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is expanding the set of places a silhouette can appear rather than changing what the package does. Base plots came first, then ggplot2 aesthetics and legend glyphs, then trees, then network vertices via an igraph shape registered automatically when both packages load. The other running thread is defensive maintenance against upstream churn: retries on failed API calls, fixes for ggplot2 4.0.0, and now an in-memory cache so repeated calls stop hammering the PhyloPic API. The ysize and size deprecation, opened in 1.5.0, is now complete and the arguments are scheduled for removal.

◆ Prediction

The deprecated ysize and size arguments look set to be removed in the next release, and on the pattern of the last four, another plotting context is a likelier addition than a change to the retrieval layer.

Alternatives to rnpn and rphylopic

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either rnpn or rphylopic.

See all rnpn alternatives → · See all rphylopic alternatives →

Recent activity from rnpn and rphylopic

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agorphylopicSilhouettes become igraph vertices; API responses cached
  2. 8mo agorphylopicBase R phylogenies gain silhouette annotation
  3. 11mo agornpnSentinel -9999 now converted to NA across all columns
  4. 1y agornpnCustom season windows for phenometrics, and a speed regression fixed
  5. 1y agornpnDependency stack and return types replaced wholesale
  6. 1y agornpnBackfilled notes for seven earlier maintenance releases
  7. 1y agorphylopicExplicit width and height replace the old sizing arguments
  8. 2y agorphylopicSilhouette legends and attribution permalinks
  9. 2y agorphylopicSilhouette resolution helper and safer colour defaults
  10. 2y agorphylopicRendering dependencies bumped for grImport2 and rsvg

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between rnpn and rphylopic?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. rnpn and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is rnpn better than rphylopic?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rnpn and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to rnpn?

Top rnpn alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rnpn alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rnpn for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rphylopic?

Top rphylopic alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rphylopic alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rphylopic for the full list with editorial commentary on each.