simlandr
Potential landscape tooling settling onto standard R generics after two rounds of renaming.
Comparison · Analytics
kde1d vs rphylopic
A side-by-side editorial comparison of kde1d and rphylopic — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
kde1d vs rphylopic: at a glance
What is kde1d?
A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.
kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.
What is rphylopic?
The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.
rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.
kde1d vs rphylopic: editorial side-by-side
kde1d
0.0ANALYTICS
A univariate density estimator that added zero-inflated data and reopened its C++ API to do it.
◆ Current state
kde1d estimates univariate densities with local polynomial kernel methods, handling bounded, discrete and now zero-inflated variables through a single type argument, with the numerical work in a header-only C++ library usable outside R. Version 1.1.0 added the zero-inflated discrete-continuous mixture case and shipped a new C++ API as an explicit breaking change; 1.1.1 followed in June with auto-generated notes and no description.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has alternated between performance work and widening the class of data it accepts. The 1.0.0 release was the performance milestone — FFT-based estimation, a better integration algorithm for the p, q and r functions, deterministic jittering replacing randomness, and standalone C++ headers. The 1.1.0 release is the scope milestone, adding a third data type to the two it already handled. Releases come from the same maintainer as svines and cluster on shared dates, so changes in the underlying C++ surface across the vine and density stack tend to ship together.
◆ Prediction
With the C++ API deliberately reworked for standalone use at 1.1.0, further work most plausibly consolidates that interface rather than adding data types. What 1.1.1 actually changed is not readable from its body.
rphylopic
0.0ANALYTICS
The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.
◆ Current state
rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.
◆ Where it's heading
Development is expanding the set of places a silhouette can appear rather than changing what the package does. Base plots came first, then ggplot2 aesthetics and legend glyphs, then trees, then network vertices via an igraph shape registered automatically when both packages load. The other running thread is defensive maintenance against upstream churn: retries on failed API calls, fixes for ggplot2 4.0.0, and now an in-memory cache so repeated calls stop hammering the PhyloPic API. The ysize and size deprecation, opened in 1.5.0, is now complete and the arguments are scheduled for removal.
◆ Prediction
The deprecated ysize and size arguments look set to be removed in the next release, and on the pattern of the last four, another plotting context is a likelier addition than a change to the retrieval layer.
Alternatives to kde1d and rphylopic
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either kde1d or rphylopic.
lavaanExtra
SEM reporting helpers converging on APA output, one CRAN resubmission at a time.
ibis.iSDM
A raster-to-terra migration is the only readable change in a feed of merge notes.
anyflights
A nycflights13 generator whose recent work is all about the data being right.
vinereg
Conditional density and log-likelihood fill out a vine copula regression package.
stringx
A drop-in string API for base R, kept alive by upstream check failures.
See all kde1d alternatives → · See all rphylopic alternatives →
Recent activity from kde1d and rphylopic
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agorphylopicSilhouettes become igraph vertices; API responses cached
- 8mo agorphylopicBase R phylogenies gain silhouette annotation
- 1y agokde1dkde1d 1.1.1
- 1y agokde1dZero-inflated mixtures and a new standalone C++ API ⚡
- 1y agorphylopicExplicit width and height replace the old sizing arguments
- 2y agorphylopicSilhouette legends and attribution permalinks
- 2y agorphylopicSilhouette resolution helper and safer colour defaults
- 2y agorphylopicRendering dependencies bumped for grImport2 and rsvg
- 4y agokde1dBit-wise Boolean operations removed
- 5y agokde1ddkde1d() invisible output fixed
- 5y agokde1dValgrind false positive silenced
- 6y agokde1dqrng dependency dropped; undefined behaviour fixed
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between kde1d and rphylopic?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. kde1d and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is kde1d better than rphylopic?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. kde1d and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to kde1d?
Top kde1d alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "kde1d alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/kde1d for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rphylopic?
Top rphylopic alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rphylopic alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rphylopic for the full list with editorial commentary on each.