← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

lavaanExtra vs rphylopic

A side-by-side editorial comparison of lavaanExtra and rphylopic — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

lavaanExtra vs rphylopic: at a glance

FeaturelavaanExtrarphylopic
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, structural-equation-modeling, lavaan, apa-reportingphylogenetics, data-visualization, r-package, ggplot2
Last editorial update1h ago7h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is lavaanExtra?

SEM reporting helpers converging on APA output, one CRAN resubmission at a time.

lavaanExtra provides shorthand syntax and formatted output around lavaan structural equation models - write_lavaan() to build model strings, and nice_* functions for fit tables, plots, and modification indices. Three of the six visible releases exist only to satisfy CRAN resubmission: a unicode problem, a dependency version check, tests running without suggested packages. The substance sits in 0.1.5, 0.1.8, and 0.1.9.

Read the full lavaanExtra trajectory →

What is rphylopic?

The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.

rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.

Read the full rphylopic trajectory →

lavaanExtra vs rphylopic: editorial side-by-side

L
lavaanExtra
ANALYTICS
0.0

SEM reporting helpers converging on APA output, one CRAN resubmission at a time.

◆ Current state

lavaanExtra provides shorthand syntax and formatted output around lavaan structural equation models - write_lavaan() to build model strings, and nice_* functions for fit tables, plots, and modification indices. Three of the six visible releases exist only to satisfy CRAN resubmission: a unicode problem, a dependency version check, tests running without suggested packages. The substance sits in 0.1.5, 0.1.8, and 0.1.9.

◆ Where it's heading

The package generalises its own vocabulary as it goes: lavaan_ind() became lavaan_defined() once it turned out to extract any user-defined parameter, and lavaan_cov() was split so lavaan_cor() covers actual correlations. Methodological positions are taken alongside the API - dropping the estimate argument from lavaan_reg() to force reporting both standardized and unstandardized values, and updating the RMSEA benchmark to Schreiber (2017). Rémi Thériault maintains it next to rempsyc, which formats output to match. Note that 0.1.5 restates the whole 0.1.4.x development series in one body.

◆ Prediction

The pattern points to another nice_* helper aimed at a reporting step that currently needs hand formatting, arriving with the usual CRAN resubmission behind it.

R
rphylopic
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R package that puts organism silhouettes on plots keeps widening where they can be drawn.

◆ Current state

rphylopic fetches PhyloPic silhouettes and places them into R graphics — base plots, ggplot2 layers, legends, and now phylogenetic trees and igraph networks. The 1.x line has been consistent about two things: adding a new plotting context per release, and steadily replacing its early sizing vocabulary with explicit width and height arguments. Attribution handling is unusually developed for a package this size, with permalinks and per-image credit built into the retrieval functions.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is expanding the set of places a silhouette can appear rather than changing what the package does. Base plots came first, then ggplot2 aesthetics and legend glyphs, then trees, then network vertices via an igraph shape registered automatically when both packages load. The other running thread is defensive maintenance against upstream churn: retries on failed API calls, fixes for ggplot2 4.0.0, and now an in-memory cache so repeated calls stop hammering the PhyloPic API. The ysize and size deprecation, opened in 1.5.0, is now complete and the arguments are scheduled for removal.

◆ Prediction

The deprecated ysize and size arguments look set to be removed in the next release, and on the pattern of the last four, another plotting context is a likelier addition than a change to the retrieval layer.

Alternatives to lavaanExtra and rphylopic

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either lavaanExtra or rphylopic.

See all lavaanExtra alternatives → · See all rphylopic alternatives →

Recent activity from lavaanExtra and rphylopic

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agorphylopicSilhouettes become igraph vertices; API responses cached
  2. 8mo agorphylopicBase R phylogenies gain silhouette annotation
  3. 1y agorphylopicExplicit width and height replace the old sizing arguments
  4. 2y agorphylopicSilhouette legends and attribution permalinks
  5. 2y agorphylopicSilhouette resolution helper and safer colour defaults
  6. 2y agolavaanExtraCRAN resubmission for a unicode problem
  7. 2y agorphylopicRendering dependencies bumped for grImport2 and rsvg
  8. 2y agolavaanExtralavaan_ind renamed to lavaan_defined; thresholds supported
  9. 2y agolavaanExtranice_modindices flags redundant items
  10. 3y agolavaanExtraSuggested dependency versions checked correctly
  11. 3y agolavaanExtraTests run without suggested dependencies
  12. 3y agolavaanExtraFit benchmarks updated and correlations split from covariances

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between lavaanExtra and rphylopic?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. lavaanExtra and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is lavaanExtra better than rphylopic?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lavaanExtra and rphylopic are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to lavaanExtra?

Top lavaanExtra alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lavaanExtra alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lavaanextra for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rphylopic?

Top rphylopic alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rphylopic alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rphylopic for the full list with editorial commentary on each.