← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

rempsyc vs tEDM

A side-by-side editorial comparison of rempsyc and tEDM — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

rempsyc vs tEDM: at a glance

FeaturerempsyctEDM
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2causal-inference, time-series, empirical-dynamic-modeling, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

What is tEDM?

The temporal half of the stscl EDM pair, tracking its spatial sibling

tEDM applies empirical dynamic modeling to time series — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and the logistic map — as the temporal counterpart to spEDM, with which it shares a maintainer and a C++ core. The recent releases are consolidation rather than expansion: index handling in cross mapping corrected, generics taught to accept varying E, k and tau, and the associated paper now cited in the README. Only three releases are visible in the feed.

Read the full tEDM trajectory →

rempsyc vs tEDM: editorial side-by-side

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

T
tEDM
ANALYTICS
0.0

The temporal half of the stscl EDM pair, tracking its spatial sibling

◆ Current state

tEDM applies empirical dynamic modeling to time series — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and the logistic map — as the temporal counterpart to spEDM, with which it shares a maintainer and a C++ core. The recent releases are consolidation rather than expansion: index handling in cross mapping corrected, generics taught to accept varying E, k and tau, and the associated paper now cited in the README. Only three releases are visible in the feed.

◆ Where it's heading

tEDM moves in lockstep with spEDM. Configurable distance metrics, varying E/k/tau inputs, strict floating-point comparison and the S3 plotting font unification all appear in both packages within days or weeks, as does the maintainer surname correction. The recent balance has tilted toward correcting library and prediction index handling — the kind of repeated attention that suggests the indexing model was the weak point of the shared core.

◆ Prediction

Expect tEDM to keep inheriting the shared-core changes spEDM lands, with its own releases staying small and centred on cross-mapping parameter handling rather than new method surface.

Alternatives to rempsyc and tEDM

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either rempsyc or tEDM.

See all rempsyc alternatives → · See all tEDM alternatives →

Recent activity from rempsyc and tEDM

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agotEDMMaintainer name corrected, published paper cited
  2. 7mo agotEDMCross-mapping index handling corrected, generics accept varying E, k, tau
  3. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  4. 11mo agotEDMConfigurable distance metrics for cross mapping
  5. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  6. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  7. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  8. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  9. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between rempsyc and tEDM?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. rempsyc and tEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is rempsyc better than tEDM?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rempsyc and tEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tEDM?

Top tEDM alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tEDM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tedm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.