webmockr
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
Comparison · Analytics
rbmi vs textreuse
A side-by-side editorial comparison of rbmi and textreuse — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
rbmi vs textreuse: at a glance
What is rbmi?
Reference-based multiple imputation for trials, now shipping without Bayesian support by default.
rbmi implements reference-based multiple imputation for longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values — the estimand machinery regulators expect for handling intercurrent events and dropout. The consequential recent change was 1.3.0 moving rstan from a hard dependency to Suggests, which takes Bayesian imputation out of the default install. Since then the work has been documentation and nomenclature discipline: 1.6.1 standardized on MNAR over a mixed NMAR/MNAR vocabulary and deprecated the nmar.rm argument accordingly.
What is textreuse?
A dormant text-matching package revived, shipped as 1.0.0, and kept current with the tidyverse.
textreuse detects reused and quoted passages across document collections using minhash and locality-sensitive hashing, with local alignment for inspecting the matches it finds. After years of inactivity, the package reached a 1.0.0 CRAN release in May 2026 that folded accumulated feature work into one version — encoding control on corpus construction, deterministic skipped-document bookkeeping, and an align_local() that returns an empty alignment instead of erroring on non-matching texts. The 1.0.2 release since then is pure compatibility maintenance.
rbmi vs textreuse: editorial side-by-side
rbmi
2.5ANALYTICS
Reference-based multiple imputation for trials, now shipping without Bayesian support by default.
◆ Current state
rbmi implements reference-based multiple imputation for longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values — the estimand machinery regulators expect for handling intercurrent events and dropout. The consequential recent change was 1.3.0 moving rstan from a hard dependency to Suggests, which takes Bayesian imputation out of the default install. Since then the work has been documentation and nomenclature discipline: 1.6.1 standardized on MNAR over a mixed NMAR/MNAR vocabulary and deprecated the nmar.rm argument accordingly.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is optimizing for adoption friction over feature breadth. Dropping a compiled Stan dependency from the default install, deprecating a bespoke seed argument in favor of base set.seed(), and aligning lsmeans() behavior and weight naming with emmeans all point the same direction — behave like a conventional R package rather than a specialized one. Documentation work in 1.6.1 covering @return on every exported function and executable examples reads as preparation for validation scrutiny rather than user demand.
◆ Prediction
Given the FAQ vignette's validation statement and the recent documentation completeness pass, the next work is more likely qualification and estimand documentation than new imputation methods.
textreuse
2.5ANALYTICS
A dormant text-matching package revived, shipped as 1.0.0, and kept current with the tidyverse.
◆ Current state
textreuse detects reused and quoted passages across document collections using minhash and locality-sensitive hashing, with local alignment for inspecting the matches it finds. After years of inactivity, the package reached a 1.0.0 CRAN release in May 2026 that folded accumulated feature work into one version — encoding control on corpus construction, deterministic skipped-document bookkeeping, and an align_local() that returns an empty alignment instead of erroring on non-matching texts. The 1.0.2 release since then is pure compatibility maintenance.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc here is restoration rather than expansion. The work has gone into making the package survivable — silencing deprecated dplyr and tidyr selection and many-to-many join warnings, moving from dead Travis and AppVeyor configs to GitHub Actions, and validating across five R platform and version combinations. Release notes now lead with verification evidence rather than features, which is the signature of a maintainer stabilizing an inherited codebase.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued compatibility releases tracking tidyverse deprecations; nothing in these entries indicates new hashing or alignment capability is planned.
Alternatives to rbmi and textreuse
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either rbmi or textreuse.
crul
crul took mocking back from webmockr and made it a property of the client itself
dendroNetwork
Six releases, six identical bodies — the feed carries the package abstract instead of release notes
chattr
chattr deleted every LLM integration it had written and outsourced the lot to ellmer
cloudml
Six years since the last functional change, and Google renamed the service it wraps in the release before that
tidymodels
The meta-package ships almost nothing, which is exactly what a version-pinning shim should do
See all rbmi alternatives → · See all textreuse alternatives →
Recent activity from rbmi and textreuse
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 20d agotextreuseCompatibility pass for current dplyr and tidyr
- 22d agorbmiMNAR nomenclature standardized, documentation completed
- 3mo agotextreuseCRAN resubmission fixing a moved README URL
- 3mo agotextreuse1.0.0 consolidates years of accumulated feature work
- 1y agorbmirstan demoted to Suggests, Bayesian imputation now opt-in ⚡
- 2y agorbmirbmi v1.2.5
- 10y agotextreuseMinhashes split out from hashes in document objects
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between rbmi and textreuse?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. rbmi and textreuse are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 2.5 vs 2.5, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is rbmi better than textreuse?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rbmi and textreuse are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 2.5 vs 2.5, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to rbmi?
Top rbmi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rbmi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rbmi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to textreuse?
Top textreuse alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "textreuse alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/textreuse for the full list with editorial commentary on each.