← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

rbmi vs tidymodels

A side-by-side editorial comparison of rbmi and tidymodels — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

rbmi vs tidymodels: at a glance

Featurerbmitidymodels
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesclinical-trials, missing-data, multiple-imputation, pharmaversetidymodels, meta-package, dependency-management, namespace-conflicts
Last editorial update2h ago44m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is rbmi?

Reference-based multiple imputation for trials, now shipping without Bayesian support by default.

rbmi implements reference-based multiple imputation for longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values — the estimand machinery regulators expect for handling intercurrent events and dropout. The consequential recent change was 1.3.0 moving rstan from a hard dependency to Suggests, which takes Bayesian imputation out of the default install. Since then the work has been documentation and nomenclature discipline: 1.6.1 standardized on MNAR over a mixed NMAR/MNAR vocabulary and deprecated the nmar.rm argument accordingly.

Read the full rbmi trajectory →

What is tidymodels?

The meta-package ships almost nothing, which is exactly what a version-pinning shim should do

The tidymodels package is a loader and version pin for the modeling framework's core set rather than a place where features live. Its entire changelog consists of updated dependency versions, adjustments to how tidymodels_prefer() resolves name conflicts against other packages, and the occasional addition of a package to the core set — workflowsets in 0.1.3, tailor in 1.4.0. The most recent releases moved the package's own code from the magrittr pipe to R's base pipe and patched a bug where some attached packages were omitted.

Read the full tidymodels trajectory →

rbmi vs tidymodels: editorial side-by-side

R
rbmi
ANALYTICS
2.5

Reference-based multiple imputation for trials, now shipping without Bayesian support by default.

◆ Current state

rbmi implements reference-based multiple imputation for longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values — the estimand machinery regulators expect for handling intercurrent events and dropout. The consequential recent change was 1.3.0 moving rstan from a hard dependency to Suggests, which takes Bayesian imputation out of the default install. Since then the work has been documentation and nomenclature discipline: 1.6.1 standardized on MNAR over a mixed NMAR/MNAR vocabulary and deprecated the nmar.rm argument accordingly.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is optimizing for adoption friction over feature breadth. Dropping a compiled Stan dependency from the default install, deprecating a bespoke seed argument in favor of base set.seed(), and aligning lsmeans() behavior and weight naming with emmeans all point the same direction — behave like a conventional R package rather than a specialized one. Documentation work in 1.6.1 covering @return on every exported function and executable examples reads as preparation for validation scrutiny rather than user demand.

◆ Prediction

Given the FAQ vignette's validation statement and the recent documentation completeness pass, the next work is more likely qualification and estimand documentation than new imputation methods.

T
tidymodels
ANALYTICS
0.0

The meta-package ships almost nothing, which is exactly what a version-pinning shim should do

◆ Current state

The tidymodels package is a loader and version pin for the modeling framework's core set rather than a place where features live. Its entire changelog consists of updated dependency versions, adjustments to how tidymodels_prefer() resolves name conflicts against other packages, and the occasional addition of a package to the core set — workflowsets in 0.1.3, tailor in 1.4.0. The most recent releases moved the package's own code from the magrittr pipe to R's base pipe and patched a bug where some attached packages were omitted.

◆ Where it's heading

Release cadence tracks the ecosystem rather than any roadmap of its own: a version bump when member packages release, a tidymodels_prefer() rule when a new conflict appears — DALEX::explains() over dplyr::explains(), recipes::update() over other update() methods. Additions to the core set are the only structurally interesting events, and there have been two in seven releases. Everything else is plumbing that exists so a single library() call attaches a consistent set of versions.

◆ Prediction

The next release will most likely be another version-set update, with any new core package the only thing worth noting. Feature news for this framework will keep arriving in the member packages, not here.

Alternatives to rbmi and tidymodels

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either rbmi or tidymodels.

See all rbmi alternatives → · See all tidymodels alternatives →

Recent activity from rbmi and tidymodels

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 22d agorbmiMNAR nomenclature standardized, documentation completed
  2. 11mo agotidymodelsFix for packages omitted from attachment
  3. 11mo agotidymodelstailor joins the core set; base pipe replaces magrittr
  4. 1y agotidymodelsConflict preferences added for DALEX and recipes
  5. 1y agorbmirstan demoted to Suggests, Bayesian imputation now opt-in
  6. 2y agorbmirbmi v1.2.5
  7. 3y agotidymodelsConflict preferences and pinned versions refreshed
  8. 4y agotidymodelsVersion refresh and testthat 3e migration
  9. 4y agotidymodelsRotating startup messages and an analysis template

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between rbmi and tidymodels?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. rbmi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is rbmi better than tidymodels?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. rbmi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to rbmi?

Top rbmi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rbmi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rbmi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tidymodels?

Top tidymodels alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidymodels alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidymodels for the full list with editorial commentary on each.