← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

qualtRics vs r2rtf

A side-by-side editorial comparison of qualtRics and r2rtf — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

qualtRics vs r2rtf: at a glance

FeaturequaltRicsr2rtf
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessurvey-data, api-client, qualtrics, ropensciclinical-reporting, rtf, internationalization, document-conversion
Last editorial update3h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is qualtRics?

qualtRics moved its contact functions onto XM Directory days before the old endpoints died.

qualtRics is the R client for the Qualtrics v3 API — fetching survey responses, definitions, distributions, and contact lists into tidy data frames. Version 3.3.0 migrated all_mailinglists() and fetch_mailinglist() from the deprecated Research Core Contacts endpoints to XM Directory, ahead of Qualtrics retiring the old ones on June 30, 2026. Authentication and directory discovery are handled automatically, but the new endpoints return a different data shape, so column names changed. Before that, releases had been steady maintenance for two years, mostly around how survey response archives are unpacked.

Read the full qualtRics trajectory →

What is r2rtf?

The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely

r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.

Read the full r2rtf trajectory →

qualtRics vs r2rtf: editorial side-by-side

Q
qualtRics
ANALYTICS
0.0

qualtRics moved its contact functions onto XM Directory days before the old endpoints died.

◆ Current state

qualtRics is the R client for the Qualtrics v3 API — fetching survey responses, definitions, distributions, and contact lists into tidy data frames. Version 3.3.0 migrated all_mailinglists() and fetch_mailinglist() from the deprecated Research Core Contacts endpoints to XM Directory, ahead of Qualtrics retiring the old ones on June 30, 2026. Authentication and directory discovery are handled automatically, but the new endpoints return a different data shape, so column names changed. Before that, releases had been steady maintenance for two years, mostly around how survey response archives are unpacked.

◆ Where it's heading

This package's roadmap is set by Qualtrics, not by its maintainers, and the release history reads as a sequence of accommodations — endpoint changes, retired APIs, and edge cases in exported files. The team's own recurring theme is reducing surprise: caching was removed from fetch_survey() in 3.2.0 so results are never stale, error handling was standardized on retry semantics, and column mappings were made inspectable via extract_colmap(). Feature additions, when they come, are new endpoints wrapped rather than new abstractions.

◆ Prediction

With the Contacts migration complete, the next likely work is bringing the remaining Research Core-era functions onto XM Directory equivalents before Qualtrics retires more of the old surface.

R
r2rtf
ANALYTICS
0.0

The clinical-report table engine learned Chinese, then learned to leave RTF entirely

◆ Current state

r2rtf builds the RTF tables, listings and figures that go into clinical study reports, and its recent releases have been about widening who and what it can serve rather than changing how tables are composed. The 1.2.0 release added internationalization — a SimSun font path for Chinese characters plus hyphenation control — and 1.3.0 followed with write_docx() and write_html(), turning the LibreOffice conversion the package had documented into exported functions.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through the window. One is output reach: RTF remains the composition target, but the artifacts that come out of it now include DOCX and HTML, and page numbering can be made table-relative across multi-page tables. The other is durability under a moving R and font stack — the ANSI/Unicode converter was rebuilt, the LaTeX mapping table generated from code rather than shipped as sysdata, unlist() usage fixed for R 4.5, and graphics-device leaks that produced stray Rplots.pdf closed off.

◆ Prediction

Having exported DOCX and HTML conversion, the likely next step is filling in what those formats lose relative to RTF — pagination and footnote fidelity are the obvious gaps. The i18n path currently covers Chinese only, so additional font families are the other plausible direction.

Alternatives to qualtRics and r2rtf

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either qualtRics or r2rtf.

See all qualtRics alternatives → · See all r2rtf alternatives →

Recent activity from qualtRics and r2rtf

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoqualtRicsMailing list functions migrated to the XM Directory API
  2. 7mo agor2rtfDOCX and HTML output become exported functions
  3. 11mo agor2rtfChinese character support arrives via an i18n font path
  4. 11mo agoqualtRicsZip extraction handles more special characters in survey titles
  5. 1y agor2rtfText colour fixed for figures encoded into RTF
  6. 1y agor2rtfFootnote handling fixed for R 4.5.0
  7. 1y agor2rtfUnicode converter rebuilt and mapping table made inspectable
  8. 1y agoqualtRicsFix for questions with both recoded values and variable naming
  9. 1y agoqualtRicsBuild and CI housekeeping alongside the 3.2.1 release
  10. 2y agoqualtRicsSurvey response caching removed from fetch_survey()
  11. 2y agor2rtfUTF-8 conversion fix and LibreOffice 7.6 support
  12. 3y agoqualtRicsArgument checking refactor and include_* NA fix

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between qualtRics and r2rtf?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. qualtRics and r2rtf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is qualtRics better than r2rtf?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. qualtRics and r2rtf are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to qualtRics?

Top qualtRics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qualtRics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qualtrics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to r2rtf?

Top r2rtf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "r2rtf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/r2rtf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.