← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

gigs vs qualtRics

A side-by-side editorial comparison of gigs and qualtRics — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-packageropensci

gigs vs qualtRics: at a glance

FeaturegigsqualtRics
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesgrowth-standards, neonatal-health, r-package, ropenscisurvey-data, api-client, qualtrics, ropensci
Last editorial update57m ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is gigs?

gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.

gigs implements international newborn and infant growth standards — INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO — converting anthropometric measurements to z-scores and centiles and classifying growth outcomes. The 0.5.0 release rewrote the public API around rOpenSci review feedback; the two releases after it change no code at all, existing purely to get the documentation site building.

Read the full gigs trajectory →

What is qualtRics?

qualtRics moved its contact functions onto XM Directory days before the old endpoints died.

qualtRics is the R client for the Qualtrics v3 API — fetching survey responses, definitions, distributions, and contact lists into tidy data frames. Version 3.3.0 migrated all_mailinglists() and fetch_mailinglist() from the deprecated Research Core Contacts endpoints to XM Directory, ahead of Qualtrics retiring the old ones on June 30, 2026. Authentication and directory discovery are handled automatically, but the new endpoints return a different data shape, so column names changed. Before that, releases had been steady maintenance for two years, mostly around how survey response archives are unpacked.

Read the full qualtRics trajectory →

gigs vs qualtRics: editorial side-by-side

G
gigs
ANALYTICS
0.0

gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.

◆ Current state

gigs implements international newborn and infant growth standards — INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO — converting anthropometric measurements to z-scores and centiles and classifying growth outcomes. The 0.5.0 release rewrote the public API around rOpenSci review feedback; the two releases after it change no code at all, existing purely to get the documentation site building.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has moved from vector-in, vector-out conversion helpers to a data.frame-oriented interface with a single classify_growth() entry point that computes whatever outcomes the supplied columns allow. That is a shift from library to tool — the user describes their data rather than picking the right function. The trailing releases suggest the code is settled and the remaining work is packaging and discoverability.

◆ Prediction

With the API rewrite absorbed and hosting moved to rOpenSci, the next substantive release should add growth standards or outcomes rather than reshape the interface again.

Q
qualtRics
ANALYTICS
0.0

qualtRics moved its contact functions onto XM Directory days before the old endpoints died.

◆ Current state

qualtRics is the R client for the Qualtrics v3 API — fetching survey responses, definitions, distributions, and contact lists into tidy data frames. Version 3.3.0 migrated all_mailinglists() and fetch_mailinglist() from the deprecated Research Core Contacts endpoints to XM Directory, ahead of Qualtrics retiring the old ones on June 30, 2026. Authentication and directory discovery are handled automatically, but the new endpoints return a different data shape, so column names changed. Before that, releases had been steady maintenance for two years, mostly around how survey response archives are unpacked.

◆ Where it's heading

This package's roadmap is set by Qualtrics, not by its maintainers, and the release history reads as a sequence of accommodations — endpoint changes, retired APIs, and edge cases in exported files. The team's own recurring theme is reducing surprise: caching was removed from fetch_survey() in 3.2.0 so results are never stale, error handling was standardized on retry semantics, and column mappings were made inspectable via extract_colmap(). Feature additions, when they come, are new endpoints wrapped rather than new abstractions.

◆ Prediction

With the Contacts migration complete, the next likely work is bringing the remaining Research Core-era functions onto XM Directory equivalents before Qualtrics retires more of the old surface.

Alternatives to gigs and qualtRics

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gigs or qualtRics.

See all gigs alternatives → · See all qualtRics alternatives →

Recent activity from gigs and qualtRics

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoqualtRicsMailing list functions migrated to the XM Directory API
  2. 11mo agoqualtRicsZip extraction handles more special characters in survey titles
  3. 1y agogigsDocs and Zenodo archiving
  4. 1y agogigsDocs-only release; nothing changed internally
  5. 1y agogigsConversion API rewritten around data frames and classify_growth()
  6. 1y agoqualtRicsFix for questions with both recoded values and variable naming
  7. 1y agoqualtRicsBuild and CI housekeeping alongside the 3.2.1 release
  8. 2y agogigsDocumentation fixes for autotest compliance
  9. 2y agogigsINTERGROWTH-21st fetal standards and input validation
  10. 2y agoqualtRicsSurvey response caching removed from fetch_survey()
  11. 2y agogigsPatch release with documentation update
  12. 3y agoqualtRicsArgument checking refactor and include_* NA fix

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between gigs and qualtRics?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package, ropensci — within Analytics. gigs and qualtRics are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is gigs better than qualtRics?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. gigs and qualtRics are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to gigs?

Top gigs alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gigs alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gigs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to qualtRics?

Top qualtRics alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qualtRics alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qualtrics for the full list with editorial commentary on each.