fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
Comparison · Analytics
qtl2fst vs rfm
A side-by-side editorial comparison of qtl2fst and rfm — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
qtl2fst vs rfm: at a glance
What is qtl2fst?
The out-of-memory backend for R/qtl2, feature-complete since 2020 and now purely on upkeep
qtl2fst backs R/qtl2 genotype probabilities with on-disk fst files so large crosses don't have to fit in RAM. Its defining release was 0.22 in 2020, which added calc_genoprob_fst() and genoprob_to_alleleprob_fst() to fuse calculation and storage in one step. The five releases since are documentation links, directory-creation robustness, a Windows example fix, and — in 0.32 — a change to how cores=0 is interpreted.
What is rfm?
A customer segmentation package that went quiet for six years and returned with dependency hygiene
rfm computes recency, frequency and monetary segmentation for customer analytics in R. The feature surface was set early: 0.1.0 shipped a Shiny app and customer-level input, 0.2.0 added default segments and median statistics, 0.2.1 added user-specified score thresholds and returnable plot objects. Then nothing for nearly six years. Version 0.4.0 in April 2026 fixes a missing-column error and a customer id fault, and moves plotly and gganimate from Suggests to Imports.
qtl2fst vs rfm: editorial side-by-side
qtl2fst
0.0ANALYTICS
The out-of-memory backend for R/qtl2, feature-complete since 2020 and now purely on upkeep
◆ Current state
qtl2fst backs R/qtl2 genotype probabilities with on-disk fst files so large crosses don't have to fit in RAM. Its defining release was 0.22 in 2020, which added calc_genoprob_fst() and genoprob_to_alleleprob_fst() to fuse calculation and storage in one step. The five releases since are documentation links, directory-creation robustness, a Windows example fix, and — in 0.32 — a change to how cores=0 is interpreted.
◆ Where it's heading
The package has settled into the role of a stable satellite of R/qtl2: it tracks the parent package's conventions rather than setting its own. The cores=0 change in 0.32 arrived alongside the identical change in qtl2convert, so the parallel-computing default is being standardized across the maintainer's packages at once. Release intervals have stretched from months to years.
◆ Prediction
Further releases will most likely mirror changes originating in R/qtl2 or CRAN checks, in the same follow-the-parent pattern as 0.24 and 0.32.
rfm
0.0ANALYTICS
A customer segmentation package that went quiet for six years and returned with dependency hygiene
◆ Current state
rfm computes recency, frequency and monetary segmentation for customer analytics in R. The feature surface was set early: 0.1.0 shipped a Shiny app and customer-level input, 0.2.0 added default segments and median statistics, 0.2.1 added user-specified score thresholds and returnable plot objects. Then nothing for nearly six years. Version 0.4.0 in April 2026 fixes a missing-column error and a customer id fault, and moves plotly and gganimate from Suggests to Imports.
◆ Where it's heading
The 0.4.0 release says more about maintenance posture than about product direction — the version jump past 0.3.x with only two bug fixes and a dependency reshuffle suggests a package being brought back to a releasable state rather than resuming development. Promoting plotly and gganimate to Imports makes the visualization stack mandatory, which is a heavier install in exchange for a simpler code path. The core RFM computation itself has not changed in this window.
◆ Prediction
The entries show a package returning from dormancy rather than pursuing a roadmap, so further small fixes are more likely than new segmentation capability.
Alternatives to qtl2fst and rfm
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either qtl2fst or rfm.
gcube
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
cubist
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
simStateSpace
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
Recent activity from qtl2fst and rfm
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agoqtl2fstcores=0 now leaves one core free instead of taking all
- 3mo agorfmrfm 0.4.0
- 1y agoqtl2fstWindows fix for the replace_path() example
- 2y agoqtl2fstDocumentation link fix
- 4y agoqtl2fstCreates missing directories instead of erroring out
- 5y agoqtl2fstTest coverage for qtl2 functions against fst-backed probabilities
- 6y agoqtl2fstDocumentation and metadata cleanup for CRAN
- 6y agorfmrfm 0.2.2
- 6y agorfmrfm 0.2.1
- 7y agorfmrfm 0.2.0
- 8y agorfmrfm 0.1.1
- 8y agorfmrfm 0.1.0
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between qtl2fst and rfm?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. qtl2fst and rfm are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is qtl2fst better than rfm?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. qtl2fst and rfm are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to qtl2fst?
Top qtl2fst alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qtl2fst alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qtl2fst for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to rfm?
Top rfm alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rfm alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rfm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.