← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fillpattern vs rfm

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fillpattern and rfm — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

fillpattern vs rfm: at a glance

Featurefillpatternrfm
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2, data-visualization, accessibility, graphicsr-package, customer-analytics, segmentation, dependencies
Last editorial update56m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fillpattern?

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

Read the full fillpattern trajectory →

What is rfm?

A customer segmentation package that went quiet for six years and returned with dependency hygiene

rfm computes recency, frequency and monetary segmentation for customer analytics in R. The feature surface was set early: 0.1.0 shipped a Shiny app and customer-level input, 0.2.0 added default segments and median statistics, 0.2.1 added user-specified score thresholds and returnable plot objects. Then nothing for nearly six years. Version 0.4.0 in April 2026 fixes a missing-column error and a customer id fault, and moves plotly and gganimate from Suggests to Imports.

Read the full rfm trajectory →

fillpattern vs rfm: editorial side-by-side

F
fillpattern
ANALYTICS
0.0

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

◆ Current state

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and entirely reactive to how the string-based size interface fails. The pattern across releases is the same: a user hits an edge — very small fill areas in 1.0.2, malformed unit strings in 1.0.3 — and the fix is either a graceful fallback or a clearer error. Leaning on R's newer graphics engine rather than reimplementing pattern rendering keeps the package small at the cost of raising its version floor.

◆ Prediction

Expect further releases to stay in the same register: parsing and validation fixes for the size and unit interface, with the pattern set itself unlikely to change.

R
rfm
ANALYTICS
0.0

A customer segmentation package that went quiet for six years and returned with dependency hygiene

◆ Current state

rfm computes recency, frequency and monetary segmentation for customer analytics in R. The feature surface was set early: 0.1.0 shipped a Shiny app and customer-level input, 0.2.0 added default segments and median statistics, 0.2.1 added user-specified score thresholds and returnable plot objects. Then nothing for nearly six years. Version 0.4.0 in April 2026 fixes a missing-column error and a customer id fault, and moves plotly and gganimate from Suggests to Imports.

◆ Where it's heading

The 0.4.0 release says more about maintenance posture than about product direction — the version jump past 0.3.x with only two bug fixes and a dependency reshuffle suggests a package being brought back to a releasable state rather than resuming development. Promoting plotly and gganimate to Imports makes the visualization stack mandatory, which is a heavier install in exchange for a simpler code path. The core RFM computation itself has not changed in this window.

◆ Prediction

The entries show a package returning from dormancy rather than pursuing a roadmap, so further small fixes are more likely than new segmentation capability.

Alternatives to fillpattern and rfm

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fillpattern or rfm.

See all fillpattern alternatives → · See all rfm alternatives →

Recent activity from fillpattern and rfm

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agorfmrfm 0.4.0
  2. 6mo agofillpatternSize string parsing fixed; invalid units now report instead of crash
  3. 2y agofillpatternSmall fill areas no longer crash; min_size falls back to solid
  4. 2y agofillpatternfillpattern 1.0.1
  5. 6y agorfmrfm 0.2.2
  6. 6y agorfmrfm 0.2.1
  7. 7y agorfmrfm 0.2.0
  8. 8y agorfmrfm 0.1.1
  9. 8y agorfmrfm 0.1.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fillpattern and rfm?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. fillpattern and rfm are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fillpattern better than rfm?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fillpattern and rfm are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fillpattern?

Top fillpattern alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fillpattern alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fillpattern for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rfm?

Top rfm alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rfm alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rfm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.