← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

qtl2 vs tulpa

A side-by-side editorial comparison of qtl2 and tulpa — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

qtl2 vs tulpa: at a glance

Featureqtl2tulpa
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.57.5
Sparks · 30d02
Top themesqtl-mapping, statistical-genetics, bioinformatics, r-packagebayesian-inference, cran-release, r-packages, spatial-modeling
Last editorial update2d ago8h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is qtl2?

The standard QTL mapping package in R opened its genome scan to user-supplied likelihood models.

qtl2 is the R toolkit for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering genotype probability calculation, genome scans with and without polygenic effects, permutation testing, SNP association, and the plotting that goes with them. The last year of work has pushed hard in two directions: tooling for high-throughput expression and protein QTL studies, and a generalisation of the scan engine itself so the log-likelihood being maximised can be supplied by the user. Note that the release history reached this feed out of order, so feed position is not a reliable guide to which release came first.

Read the full qtl2 trajectory →

What is tulpa?

The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.

tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.

Read the full tulpa trajectory →

qtl2 vs tulpa: editorial side-by-side

Q
qtl2
ANALYTICS
2.5

The standard QTL mapping package in R opened its genome scan to user-supplied likelihood models.

◆ Current state

qtl2 is the R toolkit for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering genotype probability calculation, genome scans with and without polygenic effects, permutation testing, SNP association, and the plotting that goes with them. The last year of work has pushed hard in two directions: tooling for high-throughput expression and protein QTL studies, and a generalisation of the scan engine itself so the log-likelihood being maximised can be supplied by the user. Note that the release history reached this feed out of order, so feed position is not a reliable guide to which release came first.

◆ Where it's heading

The eQTL and pQTL direction is the clearest thread — cis-trans plots, hotspot counting over a sliding window, multi-trait scan heat maps, and genome-wide genotype plots all arrived together, which is the toolkit an experiment with thousands of traits needs rather than one with a handful. Running underneath it is a steady generalisation of the core: a scan function that accepts an arbitrary likelihood, permutations that work with alternative scan functions, full variance-covariance output from single-position fits. Performance and parallelism get attention each cycle, including a more considerate default that leaves one core free. The rest is the ordinary maintenance of a long-lived package — renames to avoid tidyverse collisions, compiler warnings, and correctness fixes on specific cross types.

◆ Prediction

With scan1gen and permutation support for alternative scan functions in place, the natural next step is more model types built on that hook rather than more special-cased scan functions; the entries do not indicate which models are planned.

T
tulpa
ANALYTICS
7.5

The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.

◆ Current state

tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.

◆ Where it's heading

Two moves in nine days point at the same destination: the generics conversion made tulpa extensible by downstream packages, and CRAN admission makes it installable by them. The current cadence — several tags a week, some existing only to record a measurement that produced no code change — does not survive CRAN's submission overhead, so the release rhythm has to slow whether or not the project intends it. The correctness work still clusters on the joint nested-Laplace driver, and 0.1.0 extends the same diagnostics habit with .NL_AXIS_SD_REASONS, a closed vocabulary for an outer axis whose grid does not contain its own posterior mode.

◆ Prediction

Expect tulpaObs to follow tulpa onto CRAN, since it is the consumer whose registrations the engine has spent this window unblocking, and expect the version line to move in larger, less frequent steps now that each one carries a submission.

Alternatives to qtl2 and tulpa

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either qtl2 or tulpa.

See all qtl2 alternatives → · See all tulpa alternatives →

Recent activity from qtl2 and tulpa

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 18h agotulpaFirst CRAN release: engine surface unchanged from 0.0.198
  2. 4d agotulpatulpa_re_aghq() exposes the mode/theta cross-Hessian
  3. 8d agotulpaDense batched joint path could silently drop a grid cell
  4. 8d agotulpaCalibration and goodness-of-fit entry points become S3 generics
  5. 9d agotulpaCUDA backend had two definitions; link order decided if it ran
  6. 9d agotulpaHyperparameter bounds now flag when they leave the node range
  7. 29d agoqtl2chr_lengths() extended to cross2 objects
  8. 1mo agoqtl2A genome scan that takes your own likelihood function
  9. 2mo agoqtl2Hotspot counting and cis-trans plots for eQTL studies
  10. 3mo agoqtl2Confidence interval plotting, plus a documentation correction
  11. 1y agoqtl2Finer-grained parallelism for kinship-based scans
  12. 1y agoqtl2CSV readers renamed to avoid the readr collision

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between qtl2 and tulpa?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 2.5), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is qtl2 better than tulpa?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 2.5), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to qtl2?

Top qtl2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qtl2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qtl2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tulpa?

Top tulpa alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tulpa alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tulpa for the full list with editorial commentary on each.