← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

qtl2 vs rfm

A side-by-side editorial comparison of qtl2 and rfm — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

qtl2 vs rfm: at a glance

Featureqtl2rfm
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesqtl-mapping, statistical-genetics, bioinformatics, r-packager-package, customer-analytics, segmentation, dependencies
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is qtl2?

The standard QTL mapping package in R opened its genome scan to user-supplied likelihood models.

qtl2 is the R toolkit for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering genotype probability calculation, genome scans with and without polygenic effects, permutation testing, SNP association, and the plotting that goes with them. The last year of work has pushed hard in two directions: tooling for high-throughput expression and protein QTL studies, and a generalisation of the scan engine itself so the log-likelihood being maximised can be supplied by the user. Note that the release history reached this feed out of order, so feed position is not a reliable guide to which release came first.

Read the full qtl2 trajectory →

What is rfm?

A customer segmentation package that went quiet for six years and returned with dependency hygiene

rfm computes recency, frequency and monetary segmentation for customer analytics in R. The feature surface was set early: 0.1.0 shipped a Shiny app and customer-level input, 0.2.0 added default segments and median statistics, 0.2.1 added user-specified score thresholds and returnable plot objects. Then nothing for nearly six years. Version 0.4.0 in April 2026 fixes a missing-column error and a customer id fault, and moves plotly and gganimate from Suggests to Imports.

Read the full rfm trajectory →

qtl2 vs rfm: editorial side-by-side

Q
qtl2
ANALYTICS
2.5

The standard QTL mapping package in R opened its genome scan to user-supplied likelihood models.

◆ Current state

qtl2 is the R toolkit for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering genotype probability calculation, genome scans with and without polygenic effects, permutation testing, SNP association, and the plotting that goes with them. The last year of work has pushed hard in two directions: tooling for high-throughput expression and protein QTL studies, and a generalisation of the scan engine itself so the log-likelihood being maximised can be supplied by the user. Note that the release history reached this feed out of order, so feed position is not a reliable guide to which release came first.

◆ Where it's heading

The eQTL and pQTL direction is the clearest thread — cis-trans plots, hotspot counting over a sliding window, multi-trait scan heat maps, and genome-wide genotype plots all arrived together, which is the toolkit an experiment with thousands of traits needs rather than one with a handful. Running underneath it is a steady generalisation of the core: a scan function that accepts an arbitrary likelihood, permutations that work with alternative scan functions, full variance-covariance output from single-position fits. Performance and parallelism get attention each cycle, including a more considerate default that leaves one core free. The rest is the ordinary maintenance of a long-lived package — renames to avoid tidyverse collisions, compiler warnings, and correctness fixes on specific cross types.

◆ Prediction

With scan1gen and permutation support for alternative scan functions in place, the natural next step is more model types built on that hook rather than more special-cased scan functions; the entries do not indicate which models are planned.

R
rfm
ANALYTICS
0.0

A customer segmentation package that went quiet for six years and returned with dependency hygiene

◆ Current state

rfm computes recency, frequency and monetary segmentation for customer analytics in R. The feature surface was set early: 0.1.0 shipped a Shiny app and customer-level input, 0.2.0 added default segments and median statistics, 0.2.1 added user-specified score thresholds and returnable plot objects. Then nothing for nearly six years. Version 0.4.0 in April 2026 fixes a missing-column error and a customer id fault, and moves plotly and gganimate from Suggests to Imports.

◆ Where it's heading

The 0.4.0 release says more about maintenance posture than about product direction — the version jump past 0.3.x with only two bug fixes and a dependency reshuffle suggests a package being brought back to a releasable state rather than resuming development. Promoting plotly and gganimate to Imports makes the visualization stack mandatory, which is a heavier install in exchange for a simpler code path. The core RFM computation itself has not changed in this window.

◆ Prediction

The entries show a package returning from dormancy rather than pursuing a roadmap, so further small fixes are more likely than new segmentation capability.

Alternatives to qtl2 and rfm

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either qtl2 or rfm.

See all qtl2 alternatives → · See all rfm alternatives →

Recent activity from qtl2 and rfm

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 27d agoqtl2chr_lengths() extended to cross2 objects
  2. 1mo agoqtl2A genome scan that takes your own likelihood function
  3. 2mo agoqtl2Hotspot counting and cis-trans plots for eQTL studies
  4. 3mo agoqtl2Confidence interval plotting, plus a documentation correction
  5. 3mo agorfmrfm 0.4.0
  6. 1y agoqtl2Finer-grained parallelism for kinship-based scans
  7. 1y agoqtl2CSV readers renamed to avoid the readr collision
  8. 6y agorfmrfm 0.2.2
  9. 6y agorfmrfm 0.2.1
  10. 7y agorfmrfm 0.2.0
  11. 8y agorfmrfm 0.1.1
  12. 8y agorfmrfm 0.1.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between qtl2 and rfm?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. qtl2 is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is qtl2 better than rfm?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. qtl2 is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to qtl2?

Top qtl2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qtl2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qtl2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rfm?

Top rfm alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rfm alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rfm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.