Liquidsoap
Liquidsoap opens its 2.5 line with subtitles as a first-class content type and a streaming server of its own
Comparison · DevOps
ps vs QuestDB
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ps and QuestDB — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
ps vs QuestDB: at a glance
What is ps?
ps grew from a process inspector into the thing that reliably kills what you started.
ps is the cross-platform process API underneath processx and callr, and its recent work splits between widening what it can query and hardening the guarantee that a handle still refers to the process you think it does. Version 1.8.0 added interruptible multi-process waiting, vectorised signalling, and graceful kill with a TERM-then-KILL grace period. Version 1.9.3 rebuilt Linux process creation times on a clock pair instead of integer-second boot time, closing a window where two processes could look identical.
What is QuestDB?
QuestDB 10.0 collapses ingest and egress into one binary protocol, then aims at agent-run notebooks.
QuestDB's feed mixes release notes, engineering deep dives and customer stories, and the through-line for the past month has been QWP — its own binary columnar wire protocol. It shipped in 10.0, was benchmarked against InfluxDB Line Protocol on ingestion and against ClickHouse and TimescaleDB on Arrow reads, and now has a standalone explainer covering bidirectional dataframe transfer and built-in failover. Between the protocol posts sit JIT compiler internals and production references from banks and exchanges.
ps vs QuestDB: editorial side-by-side
ps
0.0DEVOPS
ps grew from a process inspector into the thing that reliably kills what you started.
◆ Current state
ps is the cross-platform process API underneath processx and callr, and its recent work splits between widening what it can query and hardening the guarantee that a handle still refers to the process you think it does. Version 1.8.0 added interruptible multi-process waiting, vectorised signalling, and graceful kill with a TERM-then-KILL grace period. Version 1.9.3 rebuilt Linux process creation times on a clock pair instead of integer-second boot time, closing a window where two processes could look identical.
◆ Where it's heading
The direction is from observation to control. Early releases in view are per-process queries — CPU times, memory, affinity — and the newer ones are orchestration: wait on many processes with a timeout, signal a list of handles at once, terminate a tree politely before forcing it. The create-time precision work is what makes that safe, since a handle's identity is a PID plus a start time, and a one-second resolution start time is not enough to rule out PID reuse on a busy machine.
◆ Prediction
Expect the remaining platform-specific gaps in ps_status() and ps_apps() to close before any new capability area opens, since the recent additions have all been driven by processx issue reports.
QuestDB
6.3DEVOPS
QuestDB 10.0 collapses ingest and egress into one binary protocol, then aims at agent-run notebooks.
◆ Current state
QuestDB's feed mixes release notes, engineering deep dives and customer stories, and the through-line for the past month has been QWP — its own binary columnar wire protocol. It shipped in 10.0, was benchmarked against InfluxDB Line Protocol on ingestion and against ClickHouse and TimescaleDB on Arrow reads, and now has a standalone explainer covering bidirectional dataframe transfer and built-in failover. Between the protocol posts sit JIT compiler internals and production references from banks and exchanges.
◆ Where it's heading
The protocol work is the thread that matters. QuestDB has been positioning against InfluxDB Line Protocol on ingestion throughput for a while, and 10.0 turned that from a benchmark argument into the default path both in and out of the database. The follow-up posts are consolidation rather than new capability: the same protocol re-explained for a different reader each time, which is what a project does when it needs an ecosystem to adopt a format. Live views and agent-driven notebooks remain the less-proven half of the release.
◆ Prediction
Expect client libraries and third-party connectors to be the next visible work, since a proprietary wire protocol is only worth its switching cost once the dataframe tools speak it. Whether live views leave beta is not something these entries settle.
Alternatives to ps and QuestDB
Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ps or QuestDB.
Appwrite
Appwrite keeps reworking its own plumbing — Go CLI, SquashFS mounts, and an MCP layer that refreshes itself
FusionAuth
FusionAuth's feed publishes version numbers; whether they carry news is a coin flip.
Sanity
Sanity ships across every package at once, and the agent-facing surface moves fastest.
ESP-IDF
The 6.1 candidate arrives carrying the same notes the beta already shipped in June.
Auth0
Auth0 hands tenants a throttle on their own noisy apps
Recent activity from ps and QuestDB
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2d agoQuestDBQWP: QuestDB's own binary wire protocol for ingestion and queries
- 12d agoQuestDBStreaming 500 million rows into Apache Arrow in 2.3 seconds
- 13d agoQuestDBQuestDB 10.0: QWP, one binary streaming protocol for writes and Arrow reads ⚡
- 14d agoQuestDBIntroducing QuestDB's new binary ingestion protocol: QWP
- 1mo agoQuestDBTransaction Cost Analysis with QuestDB and Polars: VWAP, Slippage and Markout
- 1mo agoQuestDBHDFC Bank uses QuestDB for mule account detection across all major 25+ banking channels
- 4mo agopsSub-second process create times on Linux
- 4mo agopsps_string() for unique process identification
- 1y agopsBuild correctly on Alpine Linux
- 1y agopsmaxrss reporting and selectable columns in ps()
- 1y agopsInstallable again on unsupported platforms
- 1y agopsMulti-process waiting, vectorised signals and graceful kill ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between ps and QuestDB?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. QuestDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is ps better than QuestDB?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. QuestDB is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to ps?
Top ps alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ps alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ps-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to QuestDB?
Top QuestDB alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "QuestDB alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/questdb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.