tidytlg
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
Comparison · Analytics
posteriordb vs webmockr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of posteriordb and webmockr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
posteriordb vs webmockr: at a glance
What is posteriordb?
A reference posterior database that hit 1.0 with a paper, and is now graded on the statistics it ships.
posteriordb distributes Bayesian models with data and reference posterior draws so inference algorithms can be benchmarked against a common target. It reached 1.0.0 alongside a published paper, and ships both R and Python access. Recent work is about the metadata around the draws — licences, machine-readable dataset descriptors, and additional summary statistics.
What is webmockr?
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
posteriordb vs webmockr: editorial side-by-side
posteriordb
0.0ANALYTICS
A reference posterior database that hit 1.0 with a paper, and is now graded on the statistics it ships.
◆ Current state
posteriordb distributes Bayesian models with data and reference posterior draws so inference algorithms can be benchmarked against a common target. It reached 1.0.0 alongside a published paper, and ships both R and Python access. Recent work is about the metadata around the draws — licences, machine-readable dataset descriptors, and additional summary statistics.
◆ Where it's heading
The database is maturing from a model collection into a citable benchmark asset: licence information per model, a Croissant metadata file for dataset discovery, and summary statistics like mean squared value and lag-1 autocorrelation that let users judge whether reference draws are good enough for their comparison. Earlier releases were about content and correctness; current ones are about making the content machine-readable and verifiable.
◆ Prediction
Further work should continue on draw-quality diagnostics and metadata rather than model count, since the last two releases both added ways to assess the reference draws instead of adding posteriors.
webmockr
0.0ANALYTICS
The stubbing library added httr2 support, then spent a year cutting itself free of everything else
◆ Current state
webmockr intercepts HTTP requests in R tests and returns stubbed responses, and since 1.0.0 it covers all three clients that matter — httr, httr2 and crul. The releases through 2025 have been about shedding dependencies: internal R6 classes unexported in 2.1.0, crul demoted from Imports to Suggests in the same release, and the mutual dependency with vcr severed in 2.2.0. The package now installs and runs without pulling in the rest of the rOpenSci HTTP stack.
◆ Where it's heading
Two arcs run in sequence. The first is coverage — multiple queued responses in 0.7.0, basic auth mocking, async through crul, then httr2 — building out what can be stubbed. The second, starting with 2.0.0, is correctness and independence: stubs are now deleted if an error occurs mid-construction rather than lingering half-built, partial matching arrives for bodies and queries, and the dependency graph is pruned release by release. The 2.2.0 split from vcr landed within a minute of crul's release taking mocking control into its own clients.
◆ Prediction
RequestPattern is documented as still exported in 2.1.0 but slated for removal, so the next major release is where that lands. Expect continued dependency pruning rather than new client support — the three clients that exist are already covered.
Alternatives to posteriordb and webmockr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either posteriordb or webmockr.
Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
rlistings
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
hoardr
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
riem
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
See all posteriordb alternatives → · See all webmockr alternatives →
Recent activity from posteriordb and webmockr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1y agowebmockrvcr dependency severed
- 1y agowebmockrInternal classes unexported; crul becomes an optional dependency
- 1y agoposteriordb1.0.0: licences, Croissant metadata, and draw diagnostics
- 1y agowebmockrFailed stub construction cleans up; partial matching extends to bodies and queries
- 2y agowebmockrhttr2 joins httr and crul as a supported client ⚡
- 2y agoposteriordbStan code updated to 2.26 syntax; posterior tags cleaned
- 3y agowebmockrQueued responses, body matching and integer status codes fixed
- 3y agoposteriordbNew posteriors and a corrected dogs model
- 3y agowebmockrRegex URI matching fixed
- 5y agoposteriordbPython module gains GitHub-backed and env-var database paths
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between posteriordb and webmockr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. posteriordb and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is posteriordb better than webmockr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. posteriordb and webmockr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to posteriordb?
Top posteriordb alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "posteriordb alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/posteriordb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to webmockr?
Top webmockr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "webmockr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/webmockr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.