Tplyr
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of posteriordb and tidytlg — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
A reference posterior database that hit 1.0 with a paper, and is now graded on the statistics it ships.
posteriordb distributes Bayesian models with data and reference posterior draws so inference algorithms can be benchmarked against a common target. It reached 1.0.0 alongside a published paper, and ships both R and Python access. Recent work is about the metadata around the draws — licences, machine-readable dataset descriptors, and additional summary statistics.
A tables-listings-graphs package that reached CRAN and then went quiet.
tidytlg generates clinical tables, listings, and graphs from tidyverse-style pipelines, maintained under the pharmaverse organisation. All four releases in the window are from a single eight-month stretch in 2023, and their content is CRAN preparation, a logging-dependency swap, and multi-file support. Release notes are merge lists rather than described changes.
posteriordb distributes Bayesian models with data and reference posterior draws so inference algorithms can be benchmarked against a common target. It reached 1.0.0 alongside a published paper, and ships both R and Python access. Recent work is about the metadata around the draws — licences, machine-readable dataset descriptors, and additional summary statistics.
The database is maturing from a model collection into a citable benchmark asset: licence information per model, a Croissant metadata file for dataset discovery, and summary statistics like mean squared value and lag-1 autocorrelation that let users judge whether reference draws are good enough for their comparison. Earlier releases were about content and correctness; current ones are about making the content machine-readable and verifiable.
Further work should continue on draw-quality diagnostics and metadata rather than model count, since the last two releases both added ways to assess the reference draws instead of adding posteriors.
tidytlg generates clinical tables, listings, and graphs from tidyverse-style pipelines, maintained under the pharmaverse organisation. All four releases in the window are from a single eight-month stretch in 2023, and their content is CRAN preparation, a logging-dependency swap, and multi-file support. Release notes are merge lists rather than described changes.
The visible arc is getting onto CRAN and staying installable — vignette corrections per CRAN comments, a badge, a check fix, and replacing the timber logging package with logrx. The one functional addition is multiple-file support. There has been no release since October 2023, so on this evidence the package is stable or dormant rather than actively developing.
The entries give no signal about planned work; with nothing shipped in roughly two years, the more likely next event is a maintenance release triggered by a dependency or CRAN check than a feature.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either posteriordb or tidytlg.
Tplyr made clinical summary tables explain where every number came from.
Clinical listings that keep inheriting their hardest problem — pagination — from the layer below.
A cache-directory helper that has shipped nothing but CRAN-triggered patches for seven years.
gigs redesigned its whole conversion API for rOpenSci, then spent three releases getting the docs to build.
A weather-data client that keeps rewriting its HTTP layer while slowly tightening its API.
datasetjson rebuilt its object model to track the CDISC Dataset-JSON 1.1 schema.
See all posteriordb alternatives → · See all tidytlg alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. posteriordb and tidytlg are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. posteriordb and tidytlg are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top posteriordb alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "posteriordb alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/posteriordb for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top tidytlg alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidytlg alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidytlg for the full list with editorial commentary on each.