FreeSWITCH
After twenty-one months of silence, FreeSWITCH 1.11 deleted thirty legacy modules and moved on
A side-by-side editorial comparison of PeerTube and SRS — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
PeerTube 8.2 spends its release candidates hardening instances against scrapers and locking down account data
The window is the 8.2.0 release-candidate train. The first candidate is the substantive one: Node.js 20 support removed, iOS below 15.4 dropped, an NGINX I/O fix for video downloads, and new configuration keys that throttle download bandwidth per instance and per IP. It also announces that the public /api/v1/accounts endpoint will move behind moderator authentication in v9. Later candidates fold in security fixes and two small features.
SRS 6.0 went stable by making H.265 work everywhere, not just in one protocol.
SRS shipped 6.0 release 0 in December 2025, promoting the 6.0 line to stable in place of 5.0 at roughly 170,000 lines of code. The headline is H.265/HEVC carried across RTMP, HTTP-FLV, HLS, HTTP-TS and SRT, with DVR recording to both MP4 and FLV. WebRTC gained WHEP for playback, stereo Opus over SDP and a configurable AAC-to-Opus bitrate; SRT moved to libsrt 1.5.3 with round-trip latency reported down to 200ms.
The window is the 8.2.0 release-candidate train. The first candidate is the substantive one: Node.js 20 support removed, iOS below 15.4 dropped, an NGINX I/O fix for video downloads, and new configuration keys that throttle download bandwidth per instance and per IP. It also announces that the public /api/v1/accounts endpoint will move behind moderator authentication in v9. Later candidates fold in security fixes and two small features.
The direction here is defensive operations rather than new viewer-facing capability. Bandwidth throttling exists because botnets download entire catalogues, and the accounts endpoint deprecation is a privacy decision applied to the federation surface. PeerTube is optimising for instance admins who have to survive hostile traffic, and it is willing to break runtime and client compatibility to do it.
A general 8.2.0 release should follow once the candidate stream of security backports settles, with the accounts endpoint deprecation carried forward as a v9 breaking change.
SRS shipped 6.0 release 0 in December 2025, promoting the 6.0 line to stable in place of 5.0 at roughly 170,000 lines of code. The headline is H.265/HEVC carried across RTMP, HTTP-FLV, HLS, HTTP-TS and SRT, with DVR recording to both MP4 and FLV. WebRTC gained WHEP for playback, stereo Opus over SDP and a configurable AAC-to-Opus bitrate; SRT moved to libsrt 1.5.3 with round-trip latency reported down to 200ms.
The eighteen months of alpha and beta tags before release 0 were overwhelmingly crash, leak and iterator fixes — smart-pointer conversions, use-after-free repairs in the HLS and bridge paths, RTC-to-RTMP stability. That is the signature of a project stabilizing an existing engine rather than extending it, with the codec work landing at the end. SRS is positioning as the self-hosted streaming server that speaks every ingest and egress protocol in one binary.
With 6.0 now the stable line, the pattern from the 5.0 era points to a run of 6.0 patch releases carrying fixes rather than features. The entries give no indication of what the next major line targets.
Other Meetings products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either PeerTube or SRS.
After twenty-one months of silence, FreeSWITCH 1.11 deleted thirty legacy modules and moved on
Six branches patched inside thirteen minutes — Asterisk's security process is the story here
The release feed stops in 2018, so nothing here describes the current product
Buried in Muvi's OTT explainer mill, Alie is quietly becoming the reason to buy.
mediasoup's Rust line is absorbing an outside security audit while finishing subchannels over pipe transport.
EventMobi's feed argues for onsite badge printing while saying nothing about what it shipped
See all PeerTube alternatives → · See all SRS alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — self-hosted — within Meetings. PeerTube and SRS are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. PeerTube and SRS are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Meetings products to evaluate alongside.
Top PeerTube alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "PeerTube alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/peertube for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top SRS alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "SRS alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/srs for the full list with editorial commentary on each.