Tinylytics
Tinylytics adds account-wide IP ignores and monitoring-only sites
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Parseable and Whatagraph — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
| Feature | Parseable | Whatagraph |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Analytics | Analytics |
| Velocity score | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 1 |
| Top themes | observability, logs, mcp-tools, query-stability | marketing-reporting, ai agents, agency-tools, mcp |
| Last editorial update | 2d ago | 1d ago |
| Website | Visit → | — |
Parseable's 3.2 patches turn the observability console into a toolset for external agents.
Parseable's 3.2 patch line shipped six releases between mid-September and late October. v3.2.5 added a tool executor API for external MCP servers and exposed read-only tools, and v3.2.6 added log and trace errors as tools and saved PromQL filters. Earlier patches added server-wide throttling, crash-safe staging recovery, and CPU, memory, disk and query metrics.
Whatagraph's IQ Agents now watch ad accounts and act on them, not just report.
Whatagraph builds client reports for agencies and ships most weeks. In late October it launched IQ Agents, which watch marketing accounts on a schedule, report problems to Slack and act through MCP in Meta, Asana and HubSpot. Mid-October brought Excel attachments in report emails, six Ahrefs report types including AI citations, stored blends and ad creatives in tables.
Parseable's 3.2 patch line shipped six releases between mid-September and late October. v3.2.5 added a tool executor API for external MCP servers and exposed read-only tools, and v3.2.6 added log and trace errors as tools and saved PromQL filters. Earlier patches added server-wide throttling, crash-safe staging recovery, and CPU, memory, disk and query metrics.
The earlier focus on trustworthy querying continues, but a new consumer has appeared: agents calling Parseable through tools. Alongside that, the operational metrics and throttling show a system being run under real load.
Expect the tool catalog to keep growing in the next patches, with write-capable tools a clear open question since v3.2.5 stops at read-only. Query stability and metrics fixes should continue alongside it.
Whatagraph builds client reports for agencies and ships most weeks. In late October it launched IQ Agents, which watch marketing accounts on a schedule, report problems to Slack and act through MCP in Meta, Asana and HubSpot. Mid-October brought Excel attachments in report emails, six Ahrefs report types including AI citations, stored blends and ad creatives in tables.
The product is moving from showing what happened in ad accounts to acting on it. Earlier releases cut the manual work of keeping reports running; IQ Agents take on the monitoring and follow-up work itself. Source coverage keeps widening alongside, from OpenAI Ads to Ahrefs AI citations.
Expect IQ Agents to gain more platforms they can act in beyond Meta, Asana and HubSpot. The entries do not show agent pricing.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Parseable or Whatagraph.
Tinylytics adds account-wide IP ignores and monitoring-only sites
DebugBear is growing from performance testing into uptime, browser support and ad-impact data.
OpenReplay lets self-hosters block the hosts a recorded session can make its asset cacher fetch.
OpenHouse records why table maintenance fails and adds timezone-aware retention.
OpenCTI accepts Filigran licenses and closes a draft-access hole in its TAXII routes.
InfluxDB keeps patching its 3.11 and 3.12 lines, now with a catalog repair tool.
See all Parseable alternatives → · See all Whatagraph alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Whatagraph is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Whatagraph is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top Parseable alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Parseable alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/parseable for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Whatagraph alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Whatagraph alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/whatagraph for the full list with editorial commentary on each.