← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

osmdata vs parameters

A side-by-side editorial comparison of osmdata and parameters — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

osmdata vs parameters: at a glance

Featureosmdataparameters
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesopenstreetmap, overpass-api, spatial-data, breaking-changeseasystats, model-parameters, standardization, mixed-models
Last editorial update53m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is osmdata?

osmdata keeps tightening its Overpass query surface, breaking small things to get types right.

The last two releases are the substantive ones. 0.4.0 lets `getbb()` resolve OSM relations via Wikidata ids, adds `filter_osm_user()` to Overpass query objects, and corrects metadata typing so timestamps are POSIXct rather than locale-dependent strings. 0.3.0 dropped the re-exported magrittr pipe, raised the R floor to 4.1 for the base pipe, and fixed polygon output to follow the OGC simple-features model instead of treating every ring as an independent polygon. Earlier entries are CRAN repairs and query-construction fixes.

Read the full osmdata trajectory →

What is parameters?

easystats' parameters package absorbs one more model class every few weeks

parameters extracts and formats coefficients from an enormous range of R model objects, and its releases read as a running ledger of that range expanding — lavaan and lavaan.mi, survey, lcmm, glmmTMB, fixest, marginaleffects, ordinal. Recent versions ship roughly monthly with a mix of new support, new arguments, and fixes for label handling and standard errors. The most consequential recent change is behavioral: post-hoc standardization no longer standardizes the intercept, setting it and its inferential statistics to NA.

Read the full parameters trajectory →

osmdata vs parameters: editorial side-by-side

O
osmdata
ANALYTICS
0.0

osmdata keeps tightening its Overpass query surface, breaking small things to get types right.

◆ Current state

The last two releases are the substantive ones. 0.4.0 lets `getbb()` resolve OSM relations via Wikidata ids, adds `filter_osm_user()` to Overpass query objects, and corrects metadata typing so timestamps are POSIXct rather than locale-dependent strings. 0.3.0 dropped the re-exported magrittr pipe, raised the R floor to 4.1 for the base pipe, and fixed polygon output to follow the OGC simple-features model instead of treating every ring as an independent polygon. Earlier entries are CRAN repairs and query-construction fixes.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is deliberate correctness work: each release accepts a small breaking change to make returned objects match the standard they claim to follow, whether that is OGC polygon structure, POSIXct timestamps, or UTF-8 metadata columns. Alongside it, the Overpass query builder keeps gaining filters — by area, by out type, by osm_types, now by user and via Wikidata. The package is maturing rather than expanding.

◆ Prediction

More Overpass filter and query-object composition helpers are the likeliest next additions, since that is where both recent releases put their new surface.

P
parameters
ANALYTICS
0.0

easystats' parameters package absorbs one more model class every few weeks

◆ Current state

parameters extracts and formats coefficients from an enormous range of R model objects, and its releases read as a running ledger of that range expanding — lavaan and lavaan.mi, survey, lcmm, glmmTMB, fixest, marginaleffects, ordinal. Recent versions ship roughly monthly with a mix of new support, new arguments, and fixes for label handling and standard errors. The most consequential recent change is behavioral: post-hoc standardization no longer standardizes the intercept, setting it and its inferential statistics to NA.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's job is to be the universal adapter for model output, so its roadmap is effectively set by what the R modelling ecosystem produces. Two threads are visible beyond coverage: getting standard errors right for awkward cases such as frailty terms and robust vcov matrices, and getting labels right when factors are converted on the fly or character variables appear in a formula. Interoperability inside easystats keeps tightening, with equivalence_test() gaining methods for modelbased objects.

◆ Prediction

Given the cadence, the next release will most likely add another model class alongside label and standard-error fixes rather than change how the package works.

Alternatives to osmdata and parameters

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either osmdata or parameters.

See all osmdata alternatives → · See all parameters alternatives →

Recent activity from osmdata and parameters

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoparametersparameters 0.29.2 extends lavaan support and fixes label dropping
  2. 1mo agoosmdataosmdata 0.4.0
  3. 2mo agoparametersparameters 0.29.1 adds a cluster argument and fixes vcov handling
  4. 3mo agoparametersparameters 0.29.0 stops standardizing the intercept in post-hoc methods
  5. 8mo agoparametersparameters 0.28.3 adds Kenward-Roger and Satterthwaite for glmmTMB
  6. 11mo agoparametersparameters 0.28.2 updates tests for the latest fixest release
  7. 11mo agoparametersparameters 0.28.1 adds robust standard errors for glmmTMB
  8. 11mo agoosmdataosmdata 0.3.0
  9. 2y agoosmdataosmdata 0.2.5 resubmitted after CRAN removal
  10. 3y agoosmdataosmdata 0.2.3 fixes test broken by sp deprecation
  11. 3y agoosmdataosmdata 0.2.2 adds out:csv queries and centre coordinates
  12. 3y agoosmdataosmdata 0.2.1 deprecates nodes_only, fixes memory leaks

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between osmdata and parameters?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. osmdata and parameters are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is osmdata better than parameters?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. osmdata and parameters are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to osmdata?

Top osmdata alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "osmdata alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/osmdata for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to parameters?

Top parameters alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "parameters alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/parameters-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.