← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

parameters vs rnaturalearth

A side-by-side editorial comparison of parameters and rnaturalearth — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

parameters vs rnaturalearth: at a glance

Featureparametersrnaturalearth
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeseasystats, model-parameters, standardization, mixed-modelsspatial-data, natural-earth, sf-migration, geopackage
Last editorial update1h ago55m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is parameters?

easystats' parameters package absorbs one more model class every few weeks

parameters extracts and formats coefficients from an enormous range of R model objects, and its releases read as a running ledger of that range expanding — lavaan and lavaan.mi, survey, lcmm, glmmTMB, fixest, marginaleffects, ordinal. Recent versions ship roughly monthly with a mix of new support, new arguments, and fixes for label handling and standard errors. The most consequential recent change is behavioral: post-hoc standardization no longer standardizes the intercept, setting it and its inferential statistics to NA.

Read the full parameters trajectory →

What is rnaturalearth?

rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.

1.0.0 ended sp support outright, making sf the default and offering terra's SpatVector via `returnclass`, after 0.3.3 had signposted that with lifecycle badges. The two releases since move to delivery mechanics: 1.1.0 reads data directly out of the zip through the GDAL Virtual File System, starts moving unloaded downloads to GeoPackage instead of shapefile, and switches the base URL to naciscdn.org; 1.2.0 adds caching to `ne_download()` when `destdir` is persistent, swaps devtools for pak when installing the companion data packages, and handles Natural Earth's inconsistent raster zip layouts.

Read the full rnaturalearth trajectory →

parameters vs rnaturalearth: editorial side-by-side

P
parameters
ANALYTICS
0.0

easystats' parameters package absorbs one more model class every few weeks

◆ Current state

parameters extracts and formats coefficients from an enormous range of R model objects, and its releases read as a running ledger of that range expanding — lavaan and lavaan.mi, survey, lcmm, glmmTMB, fixest, marginaleffects, ordinal. Recent versions ship roughly monthly with a mix of new support, new arguments, and fixes for label handling and standard errors. The most consequential recent change is behavioral: post-hoc standardization no longer standardizes the intercept, setting it and its inferential statistics to NA.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's job is to be the universal adapter for model output, so its roadmap is effectively set by what the R modelling ecosystem produces. Two threads are visible beyond coverage: getting standard errors right for awkward cases such as frailty terms and robust vcov matrices, and getting labels right when factors are converted on the fly or character variables appear in a formula. Interoperability inside easystats keeps tightening, with equivalence_test() gaining methods for modelbased objects.

◆ Prediction

Given the cadence, the next release will most likely add another model class alongside label and standard-error fixes rather than change how the package works.

R
rnaturalearth
ANALYTICS
0.0

rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.

◆ Current state

1.0.0 ended sp support outright, making sf the default and offering terra's SpatVector via `returnclass`, after 0.3.3 had signposted that with lifecycle badges. The two releases since move to delivery mechanics: 1.1.0 reads data directly out of the zip through the GDAL Virtual File System, starts moving unloaded downloads to GeoPackage instead of shapefile, and switches the base URL to naciscdn.org; 1.2.0 adds caching to `ne_download()` when `destdir` is persistent, swaps devtools for pak when installing the companion data packages, and handles Natural Earth's inconsistent raster zip layouts.

◆ Where it's heading

With the class question settled, the work has shifted to not re-downloading and not unpacking — VFS reads, caching, and a container format that does not need a sidecar of four files. That points at the package being used in repeated or automated contexts rather than interactive one-offs. The shapefile-to-GeoPackage transition is explicitly incomplete.

◆ Prediction

Completing the GeoPackage transition for `load = FALSE` downloads is the obvious next step, since 1.1.0 described it as in progress.

Alternatives to parameters and rnaturalearth

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either parameters or rnaturalearth.

See all parameters alternatives → · See all rnaturalearth alternatives →

Recent activity from parameters and rnaturalearth

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoparametersparameters 0.29.2 extends lavaan support and fixes label dropping
  2. 2mo agoparametersparameters 0.29.1 adds a cluster argument and fixes vcov handling
  3. 3mo agoparametersparameters 0.29.0 stops standardizing the intercept in post-hoc methods
  4. 6mo agornaturalearthrnaturalearth 1.2.0
  5. 8mo agoparametersparameters 0.28.3 adds Kenward-Roger and Satterthwaite for glmmTMB
  6. 11mo agoparametersparameters 0.28.2 updates tests for the latest fixest release
  7. 11mo agoparametersparameters 0.28.1 adds robust standard errors for glmmTMB
  8. 1y agornaturalearthrnaturalearth 1.1.0
  9. 2y agornaturalearthrnaturalearth 1.0.0 drops sp for sf and terra
  10. 3y agornaturalearthrnaturalearth 0.3.3 deprecates sp, imports terra

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between parameters and rnaturalearth?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. parameters and rnaturalearth are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is parameters better than rnaturalearth?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. parameters and rnaturalearth are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to parameters?

Top parameters alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "parameters alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/parameters-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rnaturalearth?

Top rnaturalearth alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rnaturalearth alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rnaturalearth for the full list with editorial commentary on each.