Graphite
Graphite's answer to its own CVE backlog is a pre-release nobody calls official.
Comparison · Analytics
OpenObserve vs NetObserv
A side-by-side editorial comparison of OpenObserve and NetObserv — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
OpenObserve vs NetObserv: at a glance
What is OpenObserve?
One release turns a telemetry store into synthetics, workflows, and AI observability.
v0.92.0 landed today after four release candidates, spanning 836 commits across the OSS and enterprise repositories. It adds three surfaces the product did not have — synthetic monitoring with private locations and agents, Workflows v1 tied to incidents, and an expanded AI observability set covering trace and session evaluations, an eval scheduler, organization AI credits, and an agent/service graph. Running alongside it, a 0.91.x maintenance branch has been taking small backported fixes on its own cadence.
What is NetObserv?
NetObserv is layering TLS visibility and health alerting on top of its eBPF flow pipeline.
NetObserv ships roughly monthly as a coordinated bundle — operator, eBPF agent, flowlogs-pipeline and console plugin move together in each release. The functional work over these six releases splits three ways: a TLS visibility feature that arrived as a knob in 1.11.3 and has been extended with metrics and alerts since, a Network Health layer built on Prometheus recording rules rather than alerts alone, and steady hardening of the agent-to-pipeline path (mTLS, hot-reload filters, packet translation and sampling fixes). Prometheus is now on by default.
OpenObserve vs NetObserv: editorial side-by-side
OpenObserve
6.3ANALYTICS
One release turns a telemetry store into synthetics, workflows, and AI observability.
◆ Current state
v0.92.0 landed today after four release candidates, spanning 836 commits across the OSS and enterprise repositories. It adds three surfaces the product did not have — synthetic monitoring with private locations and agents, Workflows v1 tied to incidents, and an expanded AI observability set covering trace and session evaluations, an eval scheduler, organization AI credits, and an agent/service graph. Running alongside it, a 0.91.x maintenance branch has been taking small backported fixes on its own cadence.
◆ Where it's heading
Scope is moving outward from storing and querying telemetry toward acting on it: alerting gained per-group and per-series rules with SLO measurement, incidents can be ingested from external alert sources, and Workflows connects automation to them. The second axis is observing AI systems rather than merely serving them, with evaluations and an agent graph now first-class. Moving Vortex and the MCP server into open source, the latter on the 2026-07-28 spec with OAuth 2.0 sign-in, points the same platform at agent clients as consumers of its data.
◆ Prediction
Expect a 0.92.x patch train within days — each of the last two GA releases drew several backport-only point releases — concentrated on the newly opened surfaces. The crate modularization noted in the release also makes a period of build and packaging fixes likely.
NetObserv
2.5ANALYTICS
NetObserv is layering TLS visibility and health alerting on top of its eBPF flow pipeline.
◆ Current state
NetObserv ships roughly monthly as a coordinated bundle — operator, eBPF agent, flowlogs-pipeline and console plugin move together in each release. The functional work over these six releases splits three ways: a TLS visibility feature that arrived as a knob in 1.11.3 and has been extended with metrics and alerts since, a Network Health layer built on Prometheus recording rules rather than alerts alone, and steady hardening of the agent-to-pipeline path (mTLS, hot-reload filters, packet translation and sampling fixes). Prometheus is now on by default.
◆ Where it's heading
The project is moving from flow collection toward opinionated health signalling — recording rules, runbook links in alerts, ingress 5xx and latency templates, health metadata driving console plugin config. That is the shape of a tool trying to answer 'is the network healthy' rather than only 'what traffic occurred'. In parallel, supply-chain and workflow security is getting real attention: SBOM generation and artifact signing, SHA-pinned GitHub Actions, pwn-request workflow checks and a pprof exposure fix all landed in the last two releases. The operator was also renamed from network-observability-operator to netobserv-operator.
◆ Prediction
Expect the TLS thread to keep extending — the sequence so far is fields, then metrics, then alerts, so dashboards and health rules built on TLS data are the natural next step. Continued investment in the Network Health rule set is the other safe bet, since it is where the last three releases have concentrated their non-dependency commits.
Alternatives to OpenObserve and NetObserv
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either OpenObserve or NetObserv.
Cortex
Cortex is betting on Parquet block storage and graduating years of experimental features.
Apache Storm
Storm 3.0 finishes removing the Clojure it was built in, and moves to a Java 21 baseline.
Apache StreamPark
Five release candidates in two years, none of them stable, and none since October 2025.
Apache HertzBeat
A monitoring project whose public release feed skips the release that mattered.
Axiom
Axiom is rebuilding observability so an AI agent, not a human, can be the first user.
See all OpenObserve alternatives → · See all NetObserv alternatives →
Recent activity from OpenObserve and NetObserv
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 2d agoOpenObservev0.92.0 adds synthetic monitoring, workflows, and AI observability ⚡
- 3d agoOpenObserveRelease candidate 4 backports fixes before the v0.92.0 GA
- 4d agoOpenObserveRC3 adds agent-level filters and parallel zstd compression
- 10d agoOpenObservev0.91.5 patches an RBAC migration and a layout bug
- 12d agoOpenObservev0.91.4 fixes memtable rotation and a column migration
- 18d agoOpenObservev0.91.3 applies anomaly thresholds without a retrain
- 19d agoNetObserv1.12.0 adds TLS alerting, flp-informers and signed releases
- 1mo agoNetObserv1.11.5 adds TLS metrics, Kafka compression and drop events
- 4mo agoNetObservTLS tracking arrives as a feature knob with new TLS fields ⚡
- 5mo agoNetObserv1.11.2 adds a pause control and TLS/mTLS hardening
- 5mo agoNetObserv1.11.1 is documentation, Snyk config and dependency updates
- 6mo agoNetObserv1.11.0 builds out Network Health rules and hot-reload filters
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between OpenObserve and NetObserv?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. OpenObserve is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is OpenObserve better than NetObserv?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenObserve is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to OpenObserve?
Top OpenObserve alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenObserve alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openobserve for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to NetObserv?
Top NetObserv alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "NetObserv alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/netobserv for the full list with editorial commentary on each.