← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

OpenObserve vs Glances

A side-by-side editorial comparison of OpenObserve and Glances — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

OpenObserve vs Glances: at a glance

FeatureOpenObserveGlances
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score6.32.5
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesai observability, synthetic monitoring, incident workflows, open sourcesystem monitoring, security audit, gpu monitoring, rest api
Last editorial update3h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is OpenObserve?

One release turns a telemetry store into synthetics, workflows, and AI observability.

v0.92.0 landed today after four release candidates, spanning 836 commits across the OSS and enterprise repositories. It adds three surfaces the product did not have — synthetic monitoring with private locations and agents, Workflows v1 tied to incidents, and an expanded AI observability set covering trace and session evaluations, an eval scheduler, organization AI credits, and an agent/service graph. Running alongside it, a 0.91.x maintenance branch has been taking small backported fixes on its own cadence.

Read the full OpenObserve trajectory →

What is Glances?

Every Glances release this year has carried CVE fixes — the monitoring tool is being audited in public.

Six releases since March, and all but one ship security patches. 4.5.2 alone corrected eight CVEs: CORS defaults allowing cross-origin credential theft, incomplete secrets redaction leaking password hashes and SNMP credentials through /api/v4/args, missing host validation leaving the REST API open to DNS rebinding, SQL injection in the DuckDB export, command injection through process names in action templates, and credential leakage via Zeroconf-spoofed browser autodiscovery. The pattern continues through 4.5.3, 4.5.4, 4.5.5 and 4.5.6, the last fixing a value-level bypass that leaked credentials embedded in URL config values. Alongside it, hardware coverage keeps widening — Intel and AMD GPUs, NVIDIA Jetson, Rockchip NPU and MPP, Raspberry Pi VideoCore.

Read the full Glances trajectory →

OpenObserve vs Glances: editorial side-by-side

O
OpenObserve
ANALYTICS
6.3

One release turns a telemetry store into synthetics, workflows, and AI observability.

◆ Current state

v0.92.0 landed today after four release candidates, spanning 836 commits across the OSS and enterprise repositories. It adds three surfaces the product did not have — synthetic monitoring with private locations and agents, Workflows v1 tied to incidents, and an expanded AI observability set covering trace and session evaluations, an eval scheduler, organization AI credits, and an agent/service graph. Running alongside it, a 0.91.x maintenance branch has been taking small backported fixes on its own cadence.

◆ Where it's heading

Scope is moving outward from storing and querying telemetry toward acting on it: alerting gained per-group and per-series rules with SLO measurement, incidents can be ingested from external alert sources, and Workflows connects automation to them. The second axis is observing AI systems rather than merely serving them, with evaluations and an agent graph now first-class. Moving Vortex and the MCP server into open source, the latter on the 2026-07-28 spec with OAuth 2.0 sign-in, points the same platform at agent clients as consumers of its data.

◆ Prediction

Expect a 0.92.x patch train within days — each of the last two GA releases drew several backport-only point releases — concentrated on the newly opened surfaces. The crate modularization noted in the release also makes a period of build and packaging fixes likely.

G
Glances
ANALYTICS
2.5

Every Glances release this year has carried CVE fixes — the monitoring tool is being audited in public.

◆ Current state

Six releases since March, and all but one ship security patches. 4.5.2 alone corrected eight CVEs: CORS defaults allowing cross-origin credential theft, incomplete secrets redaction leaking password hashes and SNMP credentials through /api/v4/args, missing host validation leaving the REST API open to DNS rebinding, SQL injection in the DuckDB export, command injection through process names in action templates, and credential leakage via Zeroconf-spoofed browser autodiscovery. The pattern continues through 4.5.3, 4.5.4, 4.5.5 and 4.5.6, the last fixing a value-level bypass that leaked credentials embedded in URL config values. Alongside it, hardware coverage keeps widening — Intel and AMD GPUs, NVIDIA Jetson, Rockchip NPU and MPP, Raspberry Pi VideoCore.

◆ Where it's heading

This is what it looks like when a tool that grew up as a local terminal dashboard gets taken seriously as a network service. Nearly every advisory in the window comes from the same root assumption — that the REST API, XML-RPC server and autodiscovery browser are on a trusted network — and the fixes are systematically removing that assumption: authentication warnings on startup, host validation, tighter CORS, redaction that covers values as well as keys. The feature work continues in parallel and is almost entirely about reading more kinds of hardware.

◆ Prediction

The advisories have moved from transport-level exposure toward data-level leaks in specific endpoints, which suggests the remaining audit surface is the export backends and config serialisation rather than the servers themselves. Expect the next release to follow the same shape: hardware plugin additions plus another round of endpoint fixes.

Alternatives to OpenObserve and Glances

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either OpenObserve or Glances.

See all OpenObserve alternatives → · See all Glances alternatives →

Recent activity from OpenObserve and Glances

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4h agoOpenObservev0.92.0 adds synthetic monitoring, workflows, and AI observability
  2. 1d agoOpenObserveRelease candidate 4 backports fixes before the v0.92.0 GA
  3. 2d agoOpenObserveRC3 adds agent-level filters and parallel zstd compression
  4. 6d agoGlancesCredential leak via URL values in /api/4/config
  5. 8d agoOpenObservev0.91.5 patches an RBAC migration and a layout bug
  6. 10d agoOpenObservev0.91.4 fixes memtable rotation and a column migration
  7. 16d agoOpenObservev0.91.3 applies anomaly thresholds without a retrain
  8. 1mo agoGlancesContainer API latency, ARM GPU monitoring, and an AMP command-execution fix
  9. 3mo agoGlancesRockchip MPP and NPU monitoring, plus three CVE corrections
  10. 4mo agoGlancesLXC/LXD support, ClickHouse export, and two CVE mitigations
  11. 4mo agoGlancesEight CVEs corrected in one release
  12. 5mo agoGlancesStability fixes, Intel GPU monitoring, and container health alerting

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between OpenObserve and Glances?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. OpenObserve is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is OpenObserve better than Glances?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenObserve is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to OpenObserve?

Top OpenObserve alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenObserve alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openobserve for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Glances?

Top Glances alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Glances alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glances for the full list with editorial commentary on each.