constants
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
Comparison · Analytics
OpenCTI vs qqman
A side-by-side editorial comparison of OpenCTI and qqman — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
OpenCTI vs qqman: at a glance
What is OpenCTI?
OpenCTI is rebuilding its connector layer into a marketplace and wiring the platform to XTM Hub
The mainline is working through the consequences of the connector catalog redesign, with each release closing gaps around it: filters and saved searches became shareable, dashboards can reuse them, and background tasks can now edit relationship start and stop times in bulk. Alongside that, an LTS branch is being maintained in parallel — 7.260309.0-lts.7 backports the security fixes and dependency updates from the recent mainline releases without any of the feature work.
What is qqman?
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
qqman does two things: manhattan() and qq() plots for genome-wide association study results. Its six visible releases run from 2014 to a single 2017 packaging fix, and the last release with any user-facing change shipped in 2015. The archive is non-monotonic — a 0.0.0 tag published after 0.1.1 archives the pre-package standalone script — so version order and publication order disagree.
OpenCTI vs qqman: editorial side-by-side
OpenCTI
6.3ANALYTICS
OpenCTI is rebuilding its connector layer into a marketplace and wiring the platform to XTM Hub
◆ Current state
The mainline is working through the consequences of the connector catalog redesign, with each release closing gaps around it: filters and saved searches became shareable, dashboards can reuse them, and background tasks can now edit relationship start and stop times in bulk. Alongside that, an LTS branch is being maintained in parallel — 7.260309.0-lts.7 backports the security fixes and dependency updates from the recent mainline releases without any of the feature work.
◆ Where it's heading
Two things are running at once. The product arc is about making the platform's own surfaces composable — a faceted connector marketplace, reusable filters, workflow approval and draft metadata — rather than adding threat-intel primitives. The engineering arc is a maintained LTS channel that gets security parity and nothing else, which is how a project behaves once it has deployments it cannot ask to track weekly releases.
◆ Prediction
Expect the mainline to keep landing XTM Hub integration and workflow-governance work at roughly a weekly cadence, with a matching lts.8 backport following whenever the next batch of security fixes accumulates.
qqman
0.0ANALYTICS
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
◆ Current state
qqman does two things: manhattan() and qq() plots for genome-wide association study results. Its six visible releases run from 2014 to a single 2017 packaging fix, and the last release with any user-facing change shipped in 2015. The archive is non-monotonic — a 0.0.0 tag published after 0.1.1 archives the pre-package standalone script — so version order and publication order disagree.
◆ Where it's heading
The real development window was 2014 to 2015. The 0.1.2 release did the substantive work, replacing the assumption that SNPs are evenly distributed across chromosomes and handing users control of axis limits, labels and log transformation; 0.1.3 then added annotation by p-value threshold and top-SNP-per-chromosome. After that the package stops. Notably, the archival 0.0.0 entry records that the original script had confidence intervals on QQ plots and richer highlighting than the released package ever regained.
◆ Prediction
With one packaging fix in the last decade, these entries support no prediction of further releases. The package reads as complete for its narrow purpose rather than abandoned mid-arc.
Alternatives to OpenCTI and qqman
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either OpenCTI or qqman.
austraits
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
ggdemetra
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
fossilsim
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
tern.rbmi
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
tern.mmrm
An MMRM tabulation package that has published nothing since its 2024 CRAN releases.
See all OpenCTI alternatives → · See all qqman alternatives →
Recent activity from OpenCTI and qqman
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoOpenCTILTS branch gets the security backport: access-scoped streams, dependency sweep
- 4d agoOpenCTIMass operations can now edit relation start and stop times
- 8d agoOpenCTISaved searches and dashboard filters become shareable and reusable
- 12d agoOpenCTIData sanity operations can be stopped mid-run
- 16d agoOpenCTIIntegrations experience reworked around the new catalog, plus draft approval workflows
- 24d agoOpenCTIConnector catalog is rebuilt as a faceted marketplace ⚡
- 9y agoqqmanREADME image path fix for pandoc
- 11y agoqqmanAnnotate SNPs by p-value threshold or per-chromosome top hit
- 11y agoqqmanChromosome ticks stop assuming even SNP spacing; axis control opens up
- 12y agoqqmanArchival tag for the pre-package standalone script
- 12y agoqqmanVignette touch-up
- 12y agoqqmanZenodo archival tag, no code change
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between OpenCTI and qqman?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. OpenCTI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is OpenCTI better than qqman?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenCTI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to OpenCTI?
Top OpenCTI alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenCTI alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/opencti for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to qqman?
Top qqman alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qqman alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qqman-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.