← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

OneSampleMR vs Tinybird

A side-by-side editorial comparison of OneSampleMR and Tinybird — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

OneSampleMR vs Tinybird: at a glance

FeatureOneSampleMRTinybird
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themesmendelian randomization, r, instrumental variables, epidemiologyforward-migration, ingestion, v1-api, data-sources
Last editorial update1h ago14h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is OneSampleMR?

OneSampleMR found that argument order in a formula was silently changing its estimates

OneSampleMR implements one-sample Mendelian randomization estimators — two-stage predictor substitution, two-stage residual inclusion, and Sanderson-Windmeijer conditional F statistics for instrument strength. The package spent its first years on packaging and dependency upkeep. The 2026 releases turn to substance: broader support for models fitted elsewhere, then a correctness fix for a defect that depended on nothing more than where covariates appeared in a formula.

Read the full OneSampleMR trajectory →

What is Tinybird?

Every weekly release now pushes Forward further ahead of Classic before the September sunset.

Tinybird ships a descriptive weekly changelog, and the current window is dominated by ingestion. Remote files can now be imported through the v1 API to append or replace Data Source rows, v1 ingestion became the default for local files a week after arriving as experimental, and JSON integer handling was corrected. Reliability work runs alongside it: quarantined data persists across compatible deployments, and deployment backfills and validation got fixes.

Read the full Tinybird trajectory →

OneSampleMR vs Tinybird: editorial side-by-side

O
OneSampleMR
ANALYTICS
0.0

OneSampleMR found that argument order in a formula was silently changing its estimates

◆ Current state

OneSampleMR implements one-sample Mendelian randomization estimators — two-stage predictor substitution, two-stage residual inclusion, and Sanderson-Windmeijer conditional F statistics for instrument strength. The package spent its first years on packaging and dependency upkeep. The 2026 releases turn to substance: broader support for models fitted elsewhere, then a correctness fix for a defect that depended on nothing more than where covariates appeared in a formula.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads. The first is reach — fsw() now reads models fitted by AER::ivreg(), estimatr::iv_robust() and fixest::feols() in addition to ivreg::ivreg(), which makes conditional F statistics available without refitting in the package's own idiom. The second is hardening: clear errors when more than one exposure is given or when a variable collides with the reserved name y, and print methods that no longer fail on user-specified t0 with log or logit links. Both come largely from user reports rather than a plan.

◆ Prediction

The estimator-support work has been adding one IV-fitting package at a time on outside contributions, so further backends are the likeliest next content — the package's own estimators have been stable since first release.

T
Tinybird
ANALYTICS
6.3

Every weekly release now pushes Forward further ahead of Classic before the September sunset.

◆ Current state

Tinybird ships a descriptive weekly changelog, and the current window is dominated by ingestion. Remote files can now be imported through the v1 API to append or replace Data Source rows, v1 ingestion became the default for local files a week after arriving as experimental, and JSON integer handling was corrected. Reliability work runs alongside it: quarantined data persists across compatible deployments, and deployment backfills and validation got fixes.

◆ Where it's heading

The Classic-to-Forward migration is the organizing fact, and the September 15 sunset for Free and Developer plans set the clock. Nearly every capability in this window lands on Forward or on the v1 surface, while Classic receives limits adjustments rather than features. Ingestion is where the investment is concentrated, moving from experimental to default in weeks.

◆ Prediction

Expect the v1 ingestion surface to keep absorbing sources — remote URLs now, likely more managed connectors next — and the remaining gaps in deployment and backfill reliability to close ahead of the sunset. The paid tiers still have no announced Classic end date.

Alternatives to OneSampleMR and Tinybird

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either OneSampleMR or Tinybird.

See all OneSampleMR alternatives → · See all Tinybird alternatives →

Recent activity from OneSampleMR and Tinybird

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoTinybirdAppend and replace Data Source rows from URLs
  2. 8d agoTinybirdPersistent quarantine data and workspace usage trends
  3. 15d agoTinybirdv1 local file ingestion is now the default
  4. 22d agoTinybirdJSON ingestion preserves integer values
  5. 29d agoTinybirdTinybird Classic sunset for Free and Developer plans
  6. 1mo agoTinybirdImproved branch-based local development
  7. 1mo agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR fixes estimates broken by covariate order in the formula
  8. 5mo agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR computes conditional F for three more IV packages
  9. 1y agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR 0.1.6
  10. 2y agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR 0.1.5
  11. 2y agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR 0.1.4
  12. 3y agoOneSampleMROneSampleMR 0.1.3

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between OneSampleMR and Tinybird?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Tinybird is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is OneSampleMR better than Tinybird?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Tinybird is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to OneSampleMR?

Top OneSampleMR alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OneSampleMR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/onesamplemr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Tinybird?

Top Tinybird alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Tinybird alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tinybird for the full list with editorial commentary on each.