Tinylytics
Tinylytics adds account-wide IP ignores and monitoring-only sites
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ntopng and Whatagraph — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
| Feature | ntopng | Whatagraph |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Analytics | Analytics |
| Velocity score | 0.0 | 6.3 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 1 |
| Top themes | network-monitoring, ai-analyst, mcp, wazuh | marketing-reporting, ai agents, agency-tools, mcp |
| Last editorial update | 2d ago | 1d ago |
| Website | Visit → | — |
ntopng 7.0 adds an AI traffic analyst, Wazuh integration and BGP in one release.
ntopng 7.0 arrived in September, ten months after 6.6. nAnalyst brings AI chat, policies, dashboards and an agentic loop across multiple LLM providers, with an MCP server included. The release also adds Wazuh XDR/SIEM integration, a Sites hierarchy, BGP/BMP with RPKI validation, a ClickHouse timeseries engine, OpenID Connect SSO, MFA and passkeys, and a new Vue.js frontend replacing legacy pages.
Whatagraph's IQ Agents now watch ad accounts and act on them, not just report.
Whatagraph builds client reports for agencies and ships most weeks. In late October it launched IQ Agents, which watch marketing accounts on a schedule, report problems to Slack and act through MCP in Meta, Asana and HubSpot. Mid-October brought Excel attachments in report emails, six Ahrefs report types including AI citations, stored blends and ad creatives in tables.
ntopng 7.0 arrived in September, ten months after 6.6. nAnalyst brings AI chat, policies, dashboards and an agentic loop across multiple LLM providers, with an MCP server included. The release also adds Wazuh XDR/SIEM integration, a Sites hierarchy, BGP/BMP with RPKI validation, a ClickHouse timeseries engine, OpenID Connect SSO, MFA and passkeys, and a new Vue.js frontend replacing legacy pages.
Each major has annexed an adjacent category, and 7.0 reaches for three at once: AI-assisted analysis, SIEM-adjacent security and routing visibility. ClickHouse is now the assumed foundation, and nAnalyst requires it. The licensing line is also explicit, with nAnalyst limited to enterprise M and above and the MCP functions split between community and pro.
Point releases should focus on nAnalyst and the new frontend, the two largest and least mature surfaces. The next major, on past spacing, is about a year off and likely extends the same analysis and security surfaces.
Whatagraph builds client reports for agencies and ships most weeks. In late October it launched IQ Agents, which watch marketing accounts on a schedule, report problems to Slack and act through MCP in Meta, Asana and HubSpot. Mid-October brought Excel attachments in report emails, six Ahrefs report types including AI citations, stored blends and ad creatives in tables.
The product is moving from showing what happened in ad accounts to acting on it. Earlier releases cut the manual work of keeping reports running; IQ Agents take on the monitoring and follow-up work itself. Source coverage keeps widening alongside, from OpenAI Ads to Ahrefs AI citations.
Expect IQ Agents to gain more platforms they can act in beyond Meta, Asana and HubSpot. The entries do not show agent pricing.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ntopng or Whatagraph.
Tinylytics adds account-wide IP ignores and monitoring-only sites
DebugBear is growing from performance testing into uptime, browser support and ad-impact data.
OpenReplay lets self-hosters block the hosts a recorded session can make its asset cacher fetch.
OpenHouse records why table maintenance fails and adds timezone-aware retention.
OpenCTI accepts Filigran licenses and closes a draft-access hole in its TAXII routes.
InfluxDB keeps patching its 3.11 and 3.12 lines, now with a catalog repair tool.
See all ntopng alternatives → · See all Whatagraph alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — mcp — within Analytics. Whatagraph is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Whatagraph is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top ntopng alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ntopng alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ntopng for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Whatagraph alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Whatagraph alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/whatagraph for the full list with editorial commentary on each.