← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

mpactr vs selection.index

A side-by-side editorial comparison of mpactr and selection.index — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

mpactr vs selection.index: at a glance

Featurempactrselection.index
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmetabolomics, mass-spectrometry, peak-filtering, data-importplant-breeding, selection-index, genomic-selection, rcpp
Last editorial update1h ago37m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is mpactr?

mpactr spent two spring releases normalizing case in metadata after users kept tripping on it.

mpactr filters mass-spectrometry peak tables — removing contaminants, ion duplicates and low-reproducibility features before downstream metabolomics analysis — with a data.table and Rcpp core. Development is slow and the recent releases are small. The May pair both address the same friction: column names and imported table names arriving in inconsistent case and failing to match.

Read the full mpactr trajectory →

What is selection.index?

A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite

selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.

Read the full selection.index trajectory →

mpactr vs selection.index: editorial side-by-side

M
mpactr
INFRA · APIS
0.0

mpactr spent two spring releases normalizing case in metadata after users kept tripping on it.

◆ Current state

mpactr filters mass-spectrometry peak tables — removing contaminants, ion duplicates and low-reproducibility features before downstream metabolomics analysis — with a data.table and Rcpp core. Development is slow and the recent releases are small. The May pair both address the same friction: column names and imported table names arriving in inconsistent case and failing to match.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is stabilizing its input contract rather than growing its filtering methods. Metadata column names are now forced lowercase inside import_data() regardless of how the file was written, imported peak_tables names not present in the injection column are lowercased too, and get_meta_data() was renamed to get_metadata() in the same pass. Before that the work was infrastructural — Rcpp introduced to speed up filtering, data.table moved from Depends to Imports, and memory errors cleared so the package passes Valgrind and both sanitizers. Note the earliest entry compares against a v1.0.0 tag that precedes 0.1.0 in the repository, so version ordering in this feed is not reliable.

◆ Prediction

The case-normalization work has now touched both metadata columns and peak table names across two consecutive releases, which suggests the input-matching problem is not fully closed and a third pass is plausible. Nothing in these entries points to new filtering methods.

S
selection.index
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A dormant plant-breeding package returns as a genomic selection index suite

◆ Current state

selection.index computes selection indices for plant breeding — weighting several traits into one number breeders can rank on. After two years of silence it shipped 2.0.0 in March 2026, and the package is barely recognisable: snake_case throughout, an Rcpp and RcppEigen computational core, and index families for genomic data, marker data, multi-stage trials and constrained genetic gain sitting beside the original phenotypic ones.

◆ Where it's heading

The first version series added one function at a time — combinatorial indices, then genetic advance, then mean performance under randomised block designs — against a fixed phenotypic framing. Version 2.0.0 abandons that framing rather than extending it. Genomic and marker information become inputs the package understands, multi-cycle simulation becomes a built-in toolset, and the old combinatorial entry points are replaced by a named lpsi(). The 2.0.1 follow-up is entirely CI and numerical-stability work, which reads like a maintainer bracing a much larger surface.

◆ Prediction

A seventeen-runner CI matrix mirroring every CRAN check flavour, added days after 2.0.0, says the immediate concern is keeping a compiled multi-family package green rather than adding to it. Expect stabilisation releases before anything new.

Alternatives to mpactr and selection.index

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mpactr or selection.index.

See all mpactr alternatives → · See all selection.index alternatives →

Recent activity from mpactr and selection.index

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agompactrPeak table names lowercased when absent from the injection column
  2. 3mo agompactrMetadata column names forced lowercase; get_metadata() renamed
  3. 5mo agoselection.indexCI expanded to 17 runners after the 2.0.0 rewrite
  4. 5mo agoselection.indexGenomic, marker and multi-stage selection indices on an Rcpp core
  5. 6mo agoselection.indexUnspecified general performance improvements
  6. 10mo agompactrValgrind and sanitizer memory issues cleared
  7. 1y agompactrRcpp added to speed up filtering; data.table moved to Imports
  8. 1y agompactrmpactr 0.1.0
  9. 2y agoselection.indexMean performance for randomised block designs
  10. 3y agoselection.indexsel.index() and sel.score.rank() removed for comb.indices()
  11. 4y agoselection.indexGenetic advance calculation added

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between mpactr and selection.index?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. mpactr and selection.index are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is mpactr better than selection.index?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mpactr and selection.index are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to mpactr?

Top mpactr alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mpactr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mpactr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to selection.index?

Top selection.index alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "selection.index alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/selection-index for the full list with editorial commentary on each.