← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

modeltime.ensemble vs spatstat.model

A side-by-side editorial comparison of modeltime.ensemble and spatstat.model — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

modeltime.ensemble vs spatstat.model: at a glance

Featuremodeltime.ensemblespatstat.model
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themestime series forecasting, ensembles, tidymodels, compatibility maintenancespatial-statistics, point-processes, model-fitting, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is modeltime.ensemble?

modeltime.ensemble wakes after four years, and the work is all tune 2.0 compatibility.

modeltime.ensemble builds average, weighted and stacked ensembles over modeltime forecast models. After a four-year gap it shipped twice in a fortnight during August and September 2025, both releases devoted to tracking breaking changes in tidymodels' tune package — new resampling column conventions, key uniqueness across resamples, recipe preparation. The tidyverse dependency was dropped in the same pass.

Read the full modeltime.ensemble trajectory →

What is spatstat.model?

spatstat's inference layer builds out determinantal and cluster process fitting

spatstat.model fits point process models and provides the diagnostics that go with them. The recent window is dominated by determinantal point process work — a variance-covariance matrix and more diagnostics in 3.7-2, additional `intensity` and `repul` methods in 3.7-1, and ROC curves for determinantal models in 3.5-0. Cluster and Cox process inference has advanced in parallel, with Waagepetersen's composite likelihood arriving in 3.6-1.

Read the full spatstat.model trajectory →

modeltime.ensemble vs spatstat.model: editorial side-by-side

M0.0

modeltime.ensemble wakes after four years, and the work is all tune 2.0 compatibility.

◆ Current state

modeltime.ensemble builds average, weighted and stacked ensembles over modeltime forecast models. After a four-year gap it shipped twice in a fortnight during August and September 2025, both releases devoted to tracking breaking changes in tidymodels' tune package — new resampling column conventions, key uniqueness across resamples, recipe preparation. The tidyverse dependency was dropped in the same pass.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a package whose forecasting capability was settled by 2021 — recursive ensembles, per-series calibration — and whose recent life is dictated entirely by upstream tidymodels churn. New contributors did that compatibility work, including one from the tidymodels side. It now requires tune 2.0.0 and modeltime.resample 0.3.0, pinning it to the current tidymodels generation rather than straddling versions.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to follow the next tune or modeltime.resample breaking change rather than to introduce new ensembling methods.

S2.5

spatstat's inference layer builds out determinantal and cluster process fitting

◆ Current state

spatstat.model fits point process models and provides the diagnostics that go with them. The recent window is dominated by determinantal point process work — a variance-covariance matrix and more diagnostics in 3.7-2, additional `intensity` and `repul` methods in 3.7-1, and ROC curves for determinantal models in 3.5-0. Cluster and Cox process inference has advanced in parallel, with Waagepetersen's composite likelihood arriving in 3.6-1.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is that model classes enter the package as fitting machinery first and only later gain the apparatus that makes them usable in practice — standard errors, diagnostics, residuals, model checking. Determinantal processes are visibly midway through that progression, reaching variance-covariance estimation only in the most recent release. Around this, the package has been broadening where models can be fitted at all: replicated point patterns on linear networks in 3.5-0, extended spatial logistic regression, and conversion of recursively partitioned models to tessellations.

◆ Prediction

Expect determinantal model support to keep filling out along the same path other model classes took, since variance estimation has only just arrived and partial residuals already exist for the cluster and Cox families. The entries do not signal a move into three dimensions here, unlike the geometry and simulation packages.

Alternatives to modeltime.ensemble and spatstat.model

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either modeltime.ensemble or spatstat.model.

See all modeltime.ensemble alternatives → · See all spatstat.model alternatives →

Recent activity from modeltime.ensemble and spatstat.model

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 18d agospatstat.modelVariance-covariance and diagnostics for determinantal models
  2. 2mo agospatstat.modelMore intensity and repul methods; boundary-aware predictions
  3. 6mo agospatstat.modelComposite likelihood for cluster processes
  4. 8mo agospatstat.modelReplicated network models and partial residuals
  5. 10mo agospatstat.modelintensity.ppm improvements for Geyer models
  6. 11mo agomodeltime.ensembleRealigned for tune 2.0.0 resampling changes
  7. 11mo agomodeltime.ensembleDrops the tidyverse dependency ahead of tune 2.0
  8. 1y agospatstat.modelROC curve support substantially extended
  9. 5y agomodeltime.ensemblePer-series calibration IDs and parallel refitting
  10. 5y agomodeltime.ensembleRecursive ensembles for single and panel series

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between modeltime.ensemble and spatstat.model?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. spatstat.model is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is modeltime.ensemble better than spatstat.model?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. spatstat.model is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to modeltime.ensemble?

Top modeltime.ensemble alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime.ensemble alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime-ensemble for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spatstat.model?

Top spatstat.model alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spatstat.model alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spatstat-model for the full list with editorial commentary on each.