← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

modelbased vs tidypredict

A side-by-side editorial comparison of modelbased and tidypredict — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

modelbased vs tidypredict: at a glance

Featuremodelbasedtidypredict
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeseasystats, marginal-effects, contrasts, mixed-modelstidypredict, sql-generation, gradient-boosting, in-database-scoring
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is modelbased?

modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar

modelbased computes marginal means, contrasts, and slopes from fitted models, and it ships every one to two months with a consistent shape: new comparison types, broader model support, and steady renaming toward clearer vocabulary. The recent arc runs from marginal effects inequality measures through inequality ratios to an omnibus global test and a post_process argument for multi-step comparisons. Argument names have been settled along the way, with trend becoming slope and an alias left behind.

Read the full modelbased trajectory →

What is tidypredict?

tidypredict now translates the gradient-boosting libraries people actually deploy

tidypredict converts fitted R models into SQL and dplyr expressions so predictions can run inside a database instead of in R. The 1.1.0 release added rpart, CatBoost, and LightGBM, with full objective and tree-type coverage for the boosted models. That followed 1.0.0, which broke random-forest output into a single formula, added glmnet, and cut fit-translation time for xgboost, partykit, and ranger.

Read the full tidypredict trajectory →

modelbased vs tidypredict: editorial side-by-side

M
modelbased
ANALYTICS
0.0

modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar

◆ Current state

modelbased computes marginal means, contrasts, and slopes from fitted models, and it ships every one to two months with a consistent shape: new comparison types, broader model support, and steady renaming toward clearer vocabulary. The recent arc runs from marginal effects inequality measures through inequality ratios to an omnibus global test and a post_process argument for multi-step comparisons. Argument names have been settled along the way, with trend becoming slope and an alias left behind.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is building a compositional vocabulary rather than a fixed menu — contrasts of average slopes, contrasts across two numeric predictors, inequality summaries across all outcome categories, and now user-supplied post-processing of comparisons. Support quietly widens underneath, covering nestedLogit, brms finite mixtures, and offsets under population and average estimation. Plotting gets attention in proportion to how often these results are presented rather than tabulated, including collapse_by_group() for showing averaged raw data under mixed-model fits.

◆ Prediction

With post_process and omnibus tests both landed, the likely next step is making these composed comparisons easier to report — formatting or plotting methods for the multi-step results rather than new comparison types.

T
tidypredict
ANALYTICS
0.0

tidypredict now translates the gradient-boosting libraries people actually deploy

◆ Current state

tidypredict converts fitted R models into SQL and dplyr expressions so predictions can run inside a database instead of in R. The 1.1.0 release added rpart, CatBoost, and LightGBM, with full objective and tree-type coverage for the boosted models. That followed 1.0.0, which broke random-forest output into a single formula, added glmnet, and cut fit-translation time for xgboost, partykit, and ranger.

◆ Where it's heading

The package's value scales directly with how many model types it can translate, and the recent work has concentrated on the tree ensembles that dominate tabular modelling in practice. Coverage now extends past what parsnip wraps, since raw CatBoost models are supported alongside parsnip and bonsai ones with an explicit escape hatch for categorical features. Performance work on the translation step suggests the models being converted have grown large enough for that to matter.

◆ Prediction

With the major boosting libraries covered, the remaining gap is what happens to preprocessing, so tighter integration with recipes or orbital for translating whole workflows is the natural next step.

Alternatives to modelbased and tidypredict

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either modelbased or tidypredict.

See all modelbased alternatives → · See all tidypredict alternatives →

Recent activity from modelbased and tidypredict

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.16.0 adds post-processing and omnibus contrast tests
  2. 3mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.15.0 contrasts average slopes across numeric predictors
  3. 5mo agotidypredicttidypredict 1.1.0 adds CatBoost, LightGBM, and rpart support
  4. 5mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.14.0 renames trend to slope and adds collapse_by_group()
  5. 8mo agotidypredicttidypredict 1.0.1 fixes base_score extraction for xgboost 3
  6. 8mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.13.1 adds marginal group-level estimates and as.data.frame()
  7. 8mo agotidypredicttidypredict 1.0.0 unifies random forest output and adds glmnet
  8. 11mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.13.0 adds inequality ratios and slope marginalization
  9. 1y agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.12.0 introduces marginal effects inequality measures
  10. 1y agotidypredicttidypredict 0.5.1 exports internals for the orbital package
  11. 3y agotidypredicttidypredict 0.5 hands maintenance to a new maintainer
  12. 4y agotidypredicttidypredict 0.4.9 relicenses to MIT and fixes SQL generation

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between modelbased and tidypredict?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. modelbased and tidypredict are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is modelbased better than tidypredict?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. modelbased and tidypredict are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to modelbased?

Top modelbased alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modelbased alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modelbased for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tidypredict?

Top tidypredict alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidypredict alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidypredict for the full list with editorial commentary on each.