← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

modelbased vs tidyclust

A side-by-side editorial comparison of modelbased and tidyclust — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

modelbased vs tidyclust: at a glance

Featuremodelbasedtidyclust
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeseasystats, marginal-effects, contrasts, mixed-modelstidyclust, clustering, tidymodels, dbscan
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is modelbased?

modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar

modelbased computes marginal means, contrasts, and slopes from fitted models, and it ships every one to two months with a consistent shape: new comparison types, broader model support, and steady renaming toward clearer vocabulary. The recent arc runs from marginal effects inequality measures through inequality ratios to an omnibus global test and a post_process argument for multi-step comparisons. Argument names have been settled along the way, with trend becoming slope and an alias left behind.

Read the full modelbased trajectory →

What is tidyclust?

tidyclust just tripled the model types it can fit, and handed finalization back to tune

tidyclust brings clustering into the tidymodels interface, and 0.3.0 was the release where its model coverage stopped being k-means and hierarchical clustering. DBSCAN and HDBSCAN, Gaussian mixtures, and mean shift all arrived at once as proper clustering specifications. The two releases since have been bug fixes on the metric and sparse-data paths, which is the usual pattern after a large surface addition.

Read the full tidyclust trajectory →

modelbased vs tidyclust: editorial side-by-side

M
modelbased
ANALYTICS
0.0

modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar

◆ Current state

modelbased computes marginal means, contrasts, and slopes from fitted models, and it ships every one to two months with a consistent shape: new comparison types, broader model support, and steady renaming toward clearer vocabulary. The recent arc runs from marginal effects inequality measures through inequality ratios to an omnibus global test and a post_process argument for multi-step comparisons. Argument names have been settled along the way, with trend becoming slope and an alias left behind.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is building a compositional vocabulary rather than a fixed menu — contrasts of average slopes, contrasts across two numeric predictors, inequality summaries across all outcome categories, and now user-supplied post-processing of comparisons. Support quietly widens underneath, covering nestedLogit, brms finite mixtures, and offsets under population and average estimation. Plotting gets attention in proportion to how often these results are presented rather than tabulated, including collapse_by_group() for showing averaged raw data under mixed-model fits.

◆ Prediction

With post_process and omnibus tests both landed, the likely next step is making these composed comparisons easier to report — formatting or plotting methods for the multi-step results rather than new comparison types.

T
tidyclust
ANALYTICS
0.0

tidyclust just tripled the model types it can fit, and handed finalization back to tune

◆ Current state

tidyclust brings clustering into the tidymodels interface, and 0.3.0 was the release where its model coverage stopped being k-means and hierarchical clustering. DBSCAN and HDBSCAN, Gaussian mixtures, and mean shift all arrived at once as proper clustering specifications. The two releases since have been bug fixes on the metric and sparse-data paths, which is the usual pattern after a large surface addition.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is converging with the rest of tidymodels rather than maintaining a parallel API: finalize_model_tidyclust() and finalize_workflow_tidyclust() are deprecated because tune::finalize_model() and tune::finalize_workflow() now handle cluster_spec objects natively. That removes the last place where clustering needed its own version of a shared verb. With density-based and model-based clustering now present, the interface has to cover model families with genuinely different assumptions than the centroid methods it started with.

◆ Prediction

The recent fixes to cluster_metric_set() labeling and custom-metric authoring suggest evaluation is the current focus, so metrics suited to density-based clusters are the likely next addition.

Alternatives to modelbased and tidyclust

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either modelbased or tidyclust.

See all modelbased alternatives → · See all tidyclust alternatives →

Recent activity from modelbased and tidyclust

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.16.0 adds post-processing and omnibus contrast tests
  2. 1mo agotidyclusttidyclust 0.3.2 fixes k_means() on sparse predictors
  3. 1mo agotidyclusttidyclust 0.3.1 stops same-named metrics silently merging
  4. 2mo agotidyclusttidyclust 0.3.0 adds DBSCAN, Gaussian mixture, and mean shift models
  5. 3mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.15.0 contrasts average slopes across numeric predictors
  6. 5mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.14.0 renames trend to slope and adds collapse_by_group()
  7. 8mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.13.1 adds marginal group-level estimates and as.data.frame()
  8. 11mo agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.13.0 adds inequality ratios and slope marginalization
  9. 1y agomodelbasedmodelbased 0.12.0 introduces marginal effects inequality measures
  10. 1y agotidyclusttidyclust 0.2.4 switches distance calculations to philentropy
  11. 2y agotidyclusttidyclust 0.2.3 resolves a clustMixType reverse-dependency issue
  12. 2y agotidyclusttidyclust 0.2.2 resolves a ClusterR reverse-dependency issue

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between modelbased and tidyclust?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. modelbased and tidyclust are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is modelbased better than tidyclust?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. modelbased and tidyclust are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to modelbased?

Top modelbased alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modelbased alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modelbased for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tidyclust?

Top tidyclust alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidyclust alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidyclust for the full list with editorial commentary on each.