← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

mmconvert vs tulpa

A side-by-side editorial comparison of mmconvert and tulpa — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

mmconvert vs tulpa: at a glance

Featuremmconverttulpa
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.07.5
Sparks · 30d02
Top themesr-package, genetics, genome-build, reference-databayesian-inference, cran-release, r-packages, spatial-modeling
Last editorial update2d ago8h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is mmconvert?

A single-purpose mouse map interpolator that solved its problem in 2023 and has coasted since

mmconvert does one thing: interpolate between GRCm39 physical positions and the revised Cox genetic map for mouse MUGA array markers. The substantive work all landed in a burst across 2021-2023 — the initial function, the GRCm39 annotation dataset, cross2_to_grcm39(), the recomputed Cox maps and their smoothed replacement. Everything since is upkeep: a warning-message fix in 0.12, and 0.14 is a test adjustment to silence a CRAN Note with no code change at all.

Read the full mmconvert trajectory →

What is tulpa?

The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.

tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.

Read the full tulpa trajectory →

mmconvert vs tulpa: editorial side-by-side

M
mmconvert
ANALYTICS
0.0

A single-purpose mouse map interpolator that solved its problem in 2023 and has coasted since

◆ Current state

mmconvert does one thing: interpolate between GRCm39 physical positions and the revised Cox genetic map for mouse MUGA array markers. The substantive work all landed in a burst across 2021-2023 — the initial function, the GRCm39 annotation dataset, cross2_to_grcm39(), the recomputed Cox maps and their smoothed replacement. Everything since is upkeep: a warning-message fix in 0.12, and 0.14 is a test adjustment to silence a CRAN Note with no code change at all.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has reached the natural end state of a reference-data converter — the reference data stopped moving, so the package stopped moving. Releases now arrive roughly annually and exist to keep CRAN checks green. The 0.14 release shipped the same day as sibling qtl2convert 0.36, confirming these are batch maintenance passes across the maintainer's packages rather than independent development.

◆ Prediction

Without a new mouse genome build or a revised Cox map, the next release is likely another CRAN-check accommodation rather than new functionality.

T
tulpa
ANALYTICS
7.5

The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.

◆ Current state

tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.

◆ Where it's heading

Two moves in nine days point at the same destination: the generics conversion made tulpa extensible by downstream packages, and CRAN admission makes it installable by them. The current cadence — several tags a week, some existing only to record a measurement that produced no code change — does not survive CRAN's submission overhead, so the release rhythm has to slow whether or not the project intends it. The correctness work still clusters on the joint nested-Laplace driver, and 0.1.0 extends the same diagnostics habit with .NL_AXIS_SD_REASONS, a closed vocabulary for an outer axis whose grid does not contain its own posterior mode.

◆ Prediction

Expect tulpaObs to follow tulpa onto CRAN, since it is the consumer whose registrations the engine has spent this window unblocking, and expect the version line to move in larger, less frequent steps now that each one carries a submission.

Alternatives to mmconvert and tulpa

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mmconvert or tulpa.

See all mmconvert alternatives → · See all tulpa alternatives →

Recent activity from mmconvert and tulpa

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 18h agotulpaFirst CRAN release: engine surface unchanged from 0.0.198
  2. 4d agotulpatulpa_re_aghq() exposes the mode/theta cross-Hessian
  3. 8d agotulpaDense batched joint path could silently drop a grid cell
  4. 8d agotulpaCalibration and goodness-of-fit entry points become S3 generics
  5. 9d agotulpaCUDA backend had two definitions; link order decided if it ran
  6. 9d agotulpaHyperparameter bounds now flag when they leave the node range
  7. 1mo agommconvertTest adjustment to clear a CRAN Note
  8. 1y agommconvertFixes a malformed warning message in mmconvert()
  9. 3y agommconvertOmits X chromosome positions for sex-averaged and male maps
  10. 3y agommconvertCRAN release adds chromosome lengths and smoothed Cox maps
  11. 3y agommconvertRecomputed Cox genetic maps and combined-array support
  12. 4y agommconvertRepoints data sources from master to main branches

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between mmconvert and tulpa?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is mmconvert better than tulpa?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to mmconvert?

Top mmconvert alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mmconvert alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mmconvert for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tulpa?

Top tulpa alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tulpa alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tulpa for the full list with editorial commentary on each.