← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

mlr3viz vs tulpa

A side-by-side editorial comparison of mlr3viz and tulpa — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

mlr3viz vs tulpa: at a glance

Featuremlr3viztulpa
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.57.5
Sparks · 30d02
Top themesmlr3, visualization, ggplot2, roc-curvesbayesian-inference, cran-release, r-packages, spatial-modeling
Last editorial update6d ago9h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is mlr3viz?

mlr3viz keeps the ecosystem's plots working while the plots themselves move out

mlr3viz supplies autoplot methods across mlr3 objects — learners, resample and benchmark results, tuning instances, ensemble feature-selection results. Recent releases are mostly defensive: suppressing ggplot2::fortify() warnings on ROC and PRC curves, pinning legend order so plots are deterministic across ggplot2 environments, and tracking mlr3 1.7.2. A visible piece of scope also left, with the LearnerSurvCoxPH plot moving to mlr3proba.

Read the full mlr3viz trajectory →

What is tulpa?

The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.

tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.

Read the full tulpa trajectory →

mlr3viz vs tulpa: editorial side-by-side

M
mlr3viz
ANALYTICS
2.5

mlr3viz keeps the ecosystem's plots working while the plots themselves move out

◆ Current state

mlr3viz supplies autoplot methods across mlr3 objects — learners, resample and benchmark results, tuning instances, ensemble feature-selection results. Recent releases are mostly defensive: suppressing ggplot2::fortify() warnings on ROC and PRC curves, pinning legend order so plots are deterministic across ggplot2 environments, and tracking mlr3 1.7.2. A visible piece of scope also left, with the LearnerSurvCoxPH plot moving to mlr3proba.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is being narrowed toward generic plotting infrastructure while learner-specific plots migrate to the packages that own those learners. What it does add is access rather than new charts — passing parameters through to precrec::autoplot(), better hints when the wrong autoplot type is requested, and a confidence-interval plot for mlr3inferr. Determinism across ggplot2 versions has become a recurring concern, which is what happens when a visualization package is depended on by documentation and tests.

◆ Prediction

Following the Cox proportional-hazards precedent, further learner-specific plots are likely to move to their owning packages, leaving mlr3viz with the cross-cutting result objects.

T
tulpa
ANALYTICS
7.5

The 0.0.x train stops at CRAN: tulpa's engine ships to the ecosystem it already anchors.

◆ Current state

tulpa is the C++/R Bayesian spatial inference engine sitting under gcol33's family of ecological occupancy packages, tagging 0.0.x releases several times a week. 0.1.0 is its first CRAN release, and the notes state outright that the engine surface is unchanged from 0.0.198 — the work is packaging discipline: local T bindings rebound to n_t/n_times, OpenMP teams capped under R CMD check, the pkgdown deploy narrowed, an aspell dictionary added. The window behind it splits between the S3 generics conversion and numerical-correctness work in the nested-Laplace grid.

◆ Where it's heading

Two moves in nine days point at the same destination: the generics conversion made tulpa extensible by downstream packages, and CRAN admission makes it installable by them. The current cadence — several tags a week, some existing only to record a measurement that produced no code change — does not survive CRAN's submission overhead, so the release rhythm has to slow whether or not the project intends it. The correctness work still clusters on the joint nested-Laplace driver, and 0.1.0 extends the same diagnostics habit with .NL_AXIS_SD_REASONS, a closed vocabulary for an outer axis whose grid does not contain its own posterior mode.

◆ Prediction

Expect tulpaObs to follow tulpa onto CRAN, since it is the consumer whose registrations the engine has spent this window unblocking, and expect the version line to move in larger, less frequent steps now that each one carries a submission.

Alternatives to mlr3viz and tulpa

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mlr3viz or tulpa.

See all mlr3viz alternatives → · See all tulpa alternatives →

Recent activity from mlr3viz and tulpa

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 18h agotulpaFirst CRAN release: engine surface unchanged from 0.0.198
  2. 4d agotulpatulpa_re_aghq() exposes the mode/theta cross-Hessian
  3. 8d agotulpaDense batched joint path could silently drop a grid cell
  4. 8d agotulpaCalibration and goodness-of-fit entry points become S3 generics
  5. 9d agotulpaCUDA backend had two definitions; link order decided if it ran
  6. 9d agotulpaHyperparameter bounds now flag when they leave the node range
  7. 24d agomlr3vizmlr3viz 0.11.1 pins legend order for deterministic plots
  8. 5mo agomlr3vizmlr3viz 0.11.0 quiets ggplot2 fortify warnings on ROC curves
  9. 1y agomlr3vizmlr3viz 0.10.1 passes plotting parameters through to precrec
  10. 1y agomlr3vizmlr3viz 0.10.0 adds a LearnerSurvCoxPH plot
  11. 2y agomlr3vizmlr3viz 0.9.0 adds EnsembleFSResult plots
  12. 2y agomlr3vizmlr3viz 0.8.0 tracks paradox 1.0.0

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between mlr3viz and tulpa?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 2.5), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is mlr3viz better than tulpa?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. tulpa is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 2.5), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to mlr3viz?

Top mlr3viz alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mlr3viz alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mlr3viz for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tulpa?

Top tulpa alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tulpa alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tulpa for the full list with editorial commentary on each.