rnaturalearth
rnaturalearth finished its sp exit and is now optimising how the data actually arrives.
Comparison · Analytics
mlr3tuning vs tidyclust
A side-by-side editorial comparison of mlr3tuning and tidyclust — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
mlr3tuning vs tidyclust: at a glance
What is mlr3tuning?
mlr3tuning is rebuilding its async machinery under a stable public surface
mlr3tuning provides hyperparameter optimization for the mlr3 ecosystem, and its recent history is dominated by the asynchronous tuning path: archive freezing, callback stages around queue evaluation, and version-locked compatibility with the rush backend. Releases pair a small feature with several fixes and an explicit compatibility line naming the mlr3 or rush version they track. The most recent release drops all workarounds for older rush versions, which suggests that dependency has stabilized enough to require rather than accommodate.
What is tidyclust?
tidyclust just tripled the model types it can fit, and handed finalization back to tune
tidyclust brings clustering into the tidymodels interface, and 0.3.0 was the release where its model coverage stopped being k-means and hierarchical clustering. DBSCAN and HDBSCAN, Gaussian mixtures, and mean shift all arrived at once as proper clustering specifications. The two releases since have been bug fixes on the metric and sparse-data paths, which is the usual pattern after a large surface addition.
mlr3tuning vs tidyclust: editorial side-by-side
mlr3tuning
2.5ANALYTICS
mlr3tuning is rebuilding its async machinery under a stable public surface
◆ Current state
mlr3tuning provides hyperparameter optimization for the mlr3 ecosystem, and its recent history is dominated by the asynchronous tuning path: archive freezing, callback stages around queue evaluation, and version-locked compatibility with the rush backend. Releases pair a small feature with several fixes and an explicit compatibility line naming the mlr3 or rush version they track. The most recent release drops all workarounds for older rush versions, which suggests that dependency has stabilized enough to require rather than accommodate.
◆ Where it's heading
Two things are being tidied at once. The async archive is converging on a consistent data.table representation across batch and async variants, so results are shaped the same regardless of how tuning ran. Separately, the package is becoming a better ecosystem citizen — unioning tuner properties on load instead of overwriting them, removing its callbacks on unload, and raising informative errors from AutoTuner accessors on an untrained model. Both are the marks of a package used as a dependency more than as a destination.
◆ Prediction
With rush pinned to 1.2.0 and the compatibility shims gone, the next release is likely to expose more of the async path through callbacks rather than change the tuning interface.
tidyclust
0.0ANALYTICS
tidyclust just tripled the model types it can fit, and handed finalization back to tune
◆ Current state
tidyclust brings clustering into the tidymodels interface, and 0.3.0 was the release where its model coverage stopped being k-means and hierarchical clustering. DBSCAN and HDBSCAN, Gaussian mixtures, and mean shift all arrived at once as proper clustering specifications. The two releases since have been bug fixes on the metric and sparse-data paths, which is the usual pattern after a large surface addition.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is converging with the rest of tidymodels rather than maintaining a parallel API: finalize_model_tidyclust() and finalize_workflow_tidyclust() are deprecated because tune::finalize_model() and tune::finalize_workflow() now handle cluster_spec objects natively. That removes the last place where clustering needed its own version of a shared verb. With density-based and model-based clustering now present, the interface has to cover model families with genuinely different assumptions than the centroid methods it started with.
◆ Prediction
The recent fixes to cluster_metric_set() labeling and custom-metric authoring suggest evaluation is the current focus, so metrics suited to density-based clusters are the likely next addition.
Alternatives to mlr3tuning and tidyclust
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either mlr3tuning or tidyclust.
writexl
writexl spent nine years refusing to do formatting, then shipped all of it in 2.0.0.
rgbif
rgbif is steadily pushing users off paged searching and onto real downloads.
rstanarm
rstanarm is community-maintained now, tracking Stan and lme4 rather than adding models.
taxa
taxa started a ground-up rewrite in 2021 and has published almost nothing since.
rotl
rotl's whole release history is keeping name matching honest against a moving taxonomy.
See all mlr3tuning alternatives → · See all tidyclust alternatives →
Recent activity from mlr3tuning and tidyclust
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 18d agomlr3tuningmlr3tuning 1.6.1 stops clobbering other packages' tuner properties
- 1mo agotidyclusttidyclust 0.3.2 fixes k_means() on sparse predictors
- 1mo agotidyclusttidyclust 0.3.1 stops same-named metrics silently merging
- 2mo agotidyclusttidyclust 0.3.0 adds DBSCAN, Gaussian mixture, and mean shift models ⚡
- 4mo agomlr3tuningmlr3tuning 1.6.0 aligns archive column order across tuning classes
- 8mo agomlr3tuningmlr3tuning 1.5.1 tracks xgboost 3.1.2.1
- 8mo agomlr3tuningmlr3tuning 1.5.0 adds queue evaluation stages to async callbacks
- 1y agomlr3tuningmlr3tuning 1.4.0 unifies logging under a base mlr3 logger
- 1y agotidyclusttidyclust 0.2.4 switches distance calculations to philentropy
- 1y agomlr3tuningmlr3tuning 1.3.0 adds a frozen async archive and leaner worker storage
- 2y agotidyclusttidyclust 0.2.3 resolves a clustMixType reverse-dependency issue
- 2y agotidyclusttidyclust 0.2.2 resolves a ClusterR reverse-dependency issue
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between mlr3tuning and tidyclust?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. mlr3tuning is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is mlr3tuning better than tidyclust?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. mlr3tuning is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to mlr3tuning?
Top mlr3tuning alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "mlr3tuning alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/mlr3tuning for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tidyclust?
Top tidyclust alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidyclust alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidyclust for the full list with editorial commentary on each.