← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

maths.genealogy vs rempsyc

A side-by-side editorial comparison of maths.genealogy and rempsyc — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

maths.genealogy vs rempsyc: at a glance

Featuremaths.genealogyrempsyc
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesacademic-genealogy, api-client, graph-visualisation, cran-complianceapa-formatting, psychology-research, statistical-tables, ggplot2
Last editorial update49m ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is maths.genealogy?

A young Mathematics Genealogy client spending its first four releases satisfying CRAN.

maths.genealogy queries the Mathematics Genealogy Project over a WebSocket connection and renders academic advisor-student trees, with plot_grviz() as the visualisation entry point. The package reached CRAN in early 2025 and its functional surface has barely moved since — max_zoom() for deep trees at 0.1.1 is the only user-facing addition in the visible history.

Read the full maths.genealogy trajectory →

What is rempsyc?

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

Read the full rempsyc trajectory →

maths.genealogy vs rempsyc: editorial side-by-side

M0.0

A young Mathematics Genealogy client spending its first four releases satisfying CRAN.

◆ Current state

maths.genealogy queries the Mathematics Genealogy Project over a WebSocket connection and renders academic advisor-student trees, with plot_grviz() as the visualisation entry point. The package reached CRAN in early 2025 and its functional surface has barely moved since — max_zoom() for deep trees at 0.1.1 is the only user-facing addition in the visible history.

◆ Where it's heading

Every release after the first is CRAN policy management. Three consecutive entries deal with the same underlying problem: examples that hit a live network resource and therefore fail unpredictably on check machines. The progression from wrapping them in \donttest{} to catching a stray case to rewriting all examples against published API-package guidance shows the maintainer converging on a pattern rather than adding features. That is the normal cost of shipping a network client to CRAN, and it appears to be settling.

◆ Prediction

With the examples problem resolved, the next release is the first plausible opportunity for feature work — likely on the plotting side, given max_zoom() was the sole non-compliance change so far. The entries do not name anything specific in progress.

R
rempsyc
ANALYTICS
0.0

Publication-ready psychology tables and plots, tracking APA style as closely as the software allows.

◆ Current state

rempsyc produces APA-formatted tables and figures for psychology research — nice_table() for results tables, plus plotting helpers for scatter plots, violin plots, densities and simple slopes. Its releases are CRAN submissions that bundle a long run of development versions, so each entry reads as a digest rather than a single change. The most recent, 0.2.0, added point labelling and per-group correlation statistics to nice_scatter and fixed nice_lm() failing on factor covariates with more than two levels.

◆ Where it's heading

Two forces drive this package and neither is its own roadmap. The first is APA style: when the 7th edition advised against beta for standardized coefficients, the package switched its output to italic b with an asterisk. The second is the surrounding ecosystem — formatting is aligned to what lavaanExtra and afex produce, contrast handling was delegated to easystats' modelbased, and Excel correlation matrix export was handed entirely to the correlation package to cut maintenance.

◆ Prediction

The pattern of delegating functionality to specialist packages while keeping the formatting layer is well established and likely continues. Because releases bundle many small dev versions, the next one will probably again mix plotting refinements with fixes surfaced by upstream changes.

Alternatives to maths.genealogy and rempsyc

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either maths.genealogy or rempsyc.

See all maths.genealogy alternatives → · See all rempsyc alternatives →

Recent activity from maths.genealogy and rempsyc

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11mo agorempsycPoint labels and per-group correlations added to nice_scatter
  2. 1y agomaths.genealogyExamples rewritten to CRAN API-package guidance
  3. 1y agomaths.genealogyRemaining network-dependent example wrapped in donttest
  4. 1y agomaths.genealogyDESCRIPTION quoting and donttest example wrapping
  5. 1y agomaths.genealogyplot_grviz() gains max_zoom for deep trees
  6. 1y agorempsycExcel correlation export delegated to the correlation package
  7. 2y agorempsycTable spacing control and a fix for name collision with afex
  8. 2y agorempsycStandardized coefficients switch to APA 7th edition b* notation
  9. 2y agorempsycLegend and standardization-check fixes
  10. 2y agorempsycnice_table starts coercing model objects automatically

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between maths.genealogy and rempsyc?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. maths.genealogy and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is maths.genealogy better than rempsyc?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. maths.genealogy and rempsyc are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to maths.genealogy?

Top maths.genealogy alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "maths.genealogy alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/maths-genealogy for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to rempsyc?

Top rempsyc alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "rempsyc alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rempsyc for the full list with editorial commentary on each.